PURPOSE: To assess the effect on diffusion tensor (DT) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of acquiring data with different scanners. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-four healthy controls and 36 multiple sclerosis patients with low disability were studied using eight MR scanners with acquisition protocols that were as close to a standard protocol as possible. Between 7 and 13 subjects were studied in each center. Region-of-interest (ROI) and histogram-based analyses of fractional anisotropy (FA), axial (D(ax)), radial (D(rad)), and mean diffusivity (MD) were performed. The influence of variables such as the acquisition center and the control/patient group was determined with an analysis of variance (ANOVA) test. RESULTS: The patient/control group explained approximately 25% of data variability of FA and D(rad) from midsagittal corpus callosum (CC) ROIs. Global FA, MD, and D(rad) in the white matter differentiated patients from controls, but with lower discriminatory power than for the CC. In the gray matter, MD discriminated patients from controls (30% of variability explained by group vs. 17% by center). CONCLUSION: Significant variability of DT-MRI data can be attributed to the acquisition center, even when a standardized protocol is used. The use of appropriate segmentation methods and statistical models allows DT-derived metrics to differentiate patients from healthy controls.
PURPOSE: To assess the effect on diffusion tensor (DT) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of acquiring data with different scanners. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-four healthy controls and 36 multiple sclerosispatients with low disability were studied using eight MR scanners with acquisition protocols that were as close to a standard protocol as possible. Between 7 and 13 subjects were studied in each center. Region-of-interest (ROI) and histogram-based analyses of fractional anisotropy (FA), axial (D(ax)), radial (D(rad)), and mean diffusivity (MD) were performed. The influence of variables such as the acquisition center and the control/patient group was determined with an analysis of variance (ANOVA) test. RESULTS: The patient/control group explained approximately 25% of data variability of FA and D(rad) from midsagittal corpus callosum (CC) ROIs. Global FA, MD, and D(rad) in the white matter differentiated patients from controls, but with lower discriminatory power than for the CC. In the gray matter, MD discriminated patients from controls (30% of variability explained by group vs. 17% by center). CONCLUSION: Significant variability of DT-MRI data can be attributed to the acquisition center, even when a standardized protocol is used. The use of appropriate segmentation methods and statistical models allows DT-derived metrics to differentiate patients from healthy controls.
Authors: R J Fox; K Sakaie; J-C Lee; J P Debbins; Y Liu; D L Arnold; E R Melhem; C H Smith; M D Philips; M Lowe; E Fisher Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2011-12-15 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Christian Enzinger; Frederik Barkhof; Olga Ciccarelli; Massimo Filippi; Ludwig Kappos; Maria A Rocca; Stefan Ropele; Àlex Rovira; Torben Schneider; Nicola de Stefano; Hugo Vrenken; Claudia Wheeler-Kingshott; Jens Wuerfel; Franz Fazekas Journal: Nat Rev Neurol Date: 2015-11-03 Impact factor: 42.937
Authors: Alvino Bisecco; Maria A Rocca; Elisabetta Pagani; Laura Mancini; Christian Enzinger; Antonio Gallo; Hugo Vrenken; Maria Laura Stromillo; Massimiliano Copetti; David L Thomas; Franz Fazekas; Gioacchino Tedeschi; Frederik Barkhof; Nicola De Stefano; Massimo Filippi Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2015-04-14 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Vincent A Magnotta; Joy T Matsui; Dawei Liu; Hans J Johnson; Jeffrey D Long; Bradley D Bolster; Bryon A Mueller; Kelvin Lim; Susumu Mori; Karl G Helmer; Jessica A Turner; Sarah Reading; Mark J Lowe; Elizabeth Aylward; Laura A Flashman; Greg Bonett; Jane S Paulsen Journal: Brain Connect Date: 2012
Authors: A S Kolff-Gart; P J W Pouwels; D P Noij; R Ljumanovic; V Vandecaveye; F de Keyzer; R de Bree; P de Graaf; D L Knol; J A Castelijns Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2014-09-25 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Sung Jun Ahn; Emil Cornea; Veronica Murphy; Martin Styner; L Fredrik Jarskog; John H Gilmore Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2019-06-08 Impact factor: 4.939