Literature DB >> 20511631

Cardiac registers: the adult cardiac surgery register.

Ben Bridgewater1.   

Abstract

AIMS OF THE SCTS ADULT CARDIAC SURGERY DATABASE: To measure the quality of care of adult cardiac surgery in GB and Ireland and provide information for quality improvement and research. QUALITY OF CARE
INTERVENTIONS: Feedback of structured data to hospitals, publication of named hospital and surgeon mortality data, publication of benchmarked activity and risk adjusted clinical outcomes through intermittent comprehensive database reports, annual screening of all hospital and individual surgeon risk adjusted mortality rates by the professional society.
SETTING: All NHS hospitals in England, Scotland and Wales with input from some private providers and hospitals in Ireland. YEARS: 1994-ongoing. POPULATION: Consecutive patients, unconsented. Current number of records: 400000. STARTPOINTS: Adult cardiac surgery operations excluding cardiac transplantation and ventricular assist devices. BASELINE DATA: 129 fields covering demographic factors, pre-operative risk factors, operative details and post-operative in-hospital outcomes. DATA CAPTURE: Entry onto local software systems by direct key board entry or subsequent transcription from paper records, with subsequent electronic upload to the central cardiac audit database. Non-financial incentives at hospital level. DATA QUALITY: Local validation processes exist in the hospitals. There is currently no external data validation process. ENDPOINTS AND LINKAGES TO OTHER DATA: All cause mortality is obtained through linkage with Office for National Statistics. No other linkages exist at present. ACCESS TO DATA: Available for research and audit by application to the SCTS database committee at http://www.scts.org.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20511631     DOI: 10.1136/hrt.2010.194019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart        ISSN: 1355-6037            Impact factor:   5.994


  10 in total

Review 1.  Meaningful outcome measures in cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Paul S Myles
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2014-03

Review 2.  Risk assessment methods for cardiac surgery and intervention.

Authors:  Nassir M Thalji; Rakesh M Suri; Kevin L Greason; Hartzell V Schaff
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2014-09-23       Impact factor: 32.419

3.  Dynamic trends in cardiac surgery: why the logistic EuroSCORE is no longer suitable for contemporary cardiac surgery and implications for future risk models.

Authors:  Graeme L Hickey; Stuart W Grant; Gavin J Murphy; Moninder Bhabra; Domenico Pagano; Katherine McAllister; Iain Buchan; Ben Bridgewater
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 4.191

Review 4.  What are the essential features of a successful surgical registry? a systematic review.

Authors:  Rishi Mandavia; Alec Knight; John Phillips; Elias Mossialos; Peter Littlejohns; Anne Schilder
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-09-24       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  JACIE accreditation for blood and marrow transplantation: past, present and future directions of an international model for healthcare quality improvement.

Authors:  J A Snowden; E McGrath; R F Duarte; R Saccardi; K Orchard; N Worel; J Kuball; C Chabannon; M Mohty
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 5.483

Review 6.  Risk Stratification for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Authors:  Abdul Ahad Khan; Ghulam Murtaza; Muhammad F Khalid; Furqan Khattak
Journal:  Cardiol Res       Date:  2019-11-24

7.  Cardiac surgery in older patients: hospital outcomes during a 15-year period from a complete national series.

Authors:  James Mark Jones; Mahmoud Loubani; Stuart W Grant; Andrew T Goodwin; Uday Trivedi; Simon Kendall; David P Jenkins
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2022-03-31

8.  Trends and outcomes for cardiac surgery in the United Kingdom from 2002 to 2016.

Authors:  Stuart W Grant; Simon Kendall; Andrew T Goodwin; Graham Cooper; Uday Trivedi; Richard Page; David P Jenkins
Journal:  JTCVS Open       Date:  2021-02-12

9.  Patient-reporting improves estimates of postoperative complication rates: a prospective cohort study in gynaecological oncology.

Authors:  R Iyer; A Gentry-Maharaj; A Nordin; R Liston; M Burnell; N Das; R Desai; R Gornall; A Beardmore-Gray; K Hillaby; S Leeson; A Linder; A Lopes; D Meechan; T Mould; J Nevin; A Olaitan; B Rufford; A Ryan; S Shanbhag; A Thackeray; N Wood; K Reynolds; U Menon
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Predictors of complications in gynaecological oncological surgery: a prospective multicentre study (UKGOSOC-UK gynaecological oncology surgical outcomes and complications).

Authors:  R Iyer; A Gentry-Maharaj; A Nordin; M Burnell; R Liston; R Manchanda; N Das; R Desai; R Gornall; A Beardmore-Gray; J Nevin; K Hillaby; S Leeson; A Linder; A Lopes; D Meechan; T Mould; S Varkey; A Olaitan; B Rufford; A Ryan; S Shanbhag; A Thackeray; N Wood; K Reynolds; U Menon
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 7.640

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.