Literature DB >> 20511333

Human factors in the management of the critically ill patient.

J F Bion1, T Abrusci, P Hibbert.   

Abstract

Unreliable delivery of best practice care is a major component of medical error. Critically ill patients are particularly susceptible to error and unreliable care. Human factors analysis, widely used in industry, provides insights into how interactions between organizations, tasks, and the individual worker impact on human behaviour and affect systems reliability. We adopt a human factors approach to examine determinants of clinical reliability in the management of critically ill patients. We conducted a narrative review based on a Medline search (1950-March 2010) combining intensive/critical care (units) with medical errors, patient safety, or delivery of healthcare; keyword and Internet search 'human factors' or 'ergonomics'. Critical illness represents a high-risk, complex system spanning speciality and geographical boundaries. Substantial opportunities exist for improving the safety and reliability of care of critically ill patients at the level of the task, the individual healthcare provider, and the organization or system. Task standardization (best practice guidelines) and simplification (bundling or checklists) should be implemented where scientific evidence is strong, or adopted subject to further research ('dynamic standardization'). Technical interventions should be embedded in everyday practice by the adjunctive use of non-technical (behavioural) interventions. These include executive 'adoption' of clinical areas, systematic methods for identifying hazards and reflective learning from error, and a range of techniques for improving teamworking and communication. Human factors analysis provides a useful framework for understanding and rectifying the causes of error and unreliability, particularly in complex systems such as critical care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20511333     DOI: 10.1093/bja/aeq126

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Anaesth        ISSN: 0007-0912            Impact factor:   9.166


  12 in total

1.  How bedside feedback improves head-of-bed angle compliance for intubated patients.

Authors:  Geb W Thomas
Journal:  IISE Trans Healthc Syst Eng       Date:  2017-05-08

2.  How can we improve adoption of protective mechanical ventilation in United Kingdom critical care units?

Authors:  Paul P Dean; Claire Horsfield
Journal:  J Intensive Care Soc       Date:  2018-02-05

Review 3.  Surgical safety in radical cystectomy: the anesthetist's point of view-how to make a safe procedure safer.

Authors:  Dominique Engel; Marc A Furrer; Patrick Y Wuethrich; Lukas M Löffel
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Where the rubber meets the road: using FRAM to align work-as-imagined with work-as-done when implementing clinical guidelines.

Authors:  Robyn Clay-Williams; Jeanette Hounsgaard; Erik Hollnagel
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2015-08-29       Impact factor: 7.327

5.  Evidence-based design in an intensive care unit: end-user perceptions.

Authors:  Mauricio Ferri; David A Zygun; Alexandra Harrison; Henry T Stelfox
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2015-04-25       Impact factor: 2.217

6.  Evaluation of self-perception of mechanical ventilation knowledge among Brazilian final-year medical students, residents and emergency physicians.

Authors:  Fernando Sabia Tallo; Simone de Campos Vieira Abib; Alexandre Jorgi de Andrade Negri; Paulo Cesar; Renato Delascio Lopes; Antônio Carlos Lopes
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 2.365

Review 7.  Next-generation, personalised, model-based critical care medicine: a state-of-the art review of in silico virtual patient models, methods, and cohorts, and how to validation them.

Authors:  J Geoffrey Chase; Jean-Charles Preiser; Jennifer L Dickson; Antoine Pironet; Yeong Shiong Chiew; Christopher G Pretty; Geoffrey M Shaw; Balazs Benyo; Knut Moeller; Soroush Safaei; Merryn Tawhai; Peter Hunter; Thomas Desaive
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 2.819

8.  Re-designing a rapid response system: effect on staff experiences and perceptions of rapid response team calls.

Authors:  Richard Chalwin; Lynne Giles; Amy Salter; Karoline Kapitola; Jonathan Karnon
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  Crew resource management in the ICU: the need for culture change.

Authors:  Marck Htm Haerkens; Donald H Jenkins; Johannes G van der Hoeven
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 6.925

10.  Testing the implementation of an electronic process-of-care checklist for use during morning medical rounds in a tertiary intensive care unit: a prospective before-after study.

Authors:  Karena M Conroy; Doug Elliott; Anthony R Burrell
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 6.925

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.