Literature DB >> 20510253

Sulforaphane induces DNA single strand breaks in cultured human cells.

Piero Sestili1, Marco Paolillo, Monia Lenzi, Evelin Colombo, Luciana Vallorani, Lucia Casadei, Chiara Martinelli, Carmela Fimognari.   

Abstract

Sulforaphane (SFR), an isothiocyanate from cruciferous vegetables, possesses growth-inhibiting and apoptosis-inducing activities in cancer cell lines. Recently, SFR has been shown to promote the mitochondrial formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in human cancer cell lines. The present study was undertaken to see whether SFR-derived ROS might cause DNA damage in cultured human cells, namely T limphoblastoid Jurkat and human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC). 1-3 h treatments with 10-30 microM SFR elicited intracellular ROS formation (as assayed with dihydrorhodamine, DHR, oxidation) as well as DNA breakage (as assessed with fast halo assay, FHA). These effects lacked cell-type specificity, since could be observed in both Jurkat and HUVEC. Differential-pH FHA analysis of damaged DNA showed that SFR causes frank DNA single strand breaks (SSBs); no DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) were found within the considered treatment times (up to 3 h). SFR-derived ROS were formed at the mitochondrial respiratory chain (MRC) level: indeed rotenone or myxothiazol (MRC Complex I and III inhibitors, respectively) abrogated ROS formation. Furthermore ROS were not formed in Jurkat cells pharmacologically depleted of respiring mitochondria (MRC-/Jurkat). Formation of ROS was causally linked to the induction of SSBs: indeed all the experimental conditions capable of preventing ROS formation also prevented the damage of nuclear DNA from SFR-intoxicated cells. As to the toxicological relevance of SSBs, we found that their prevention slightly but significantly attenuated SFR cytotoxicity, suggesting that high-dose SFR toxicity is the result of a complex series of events among which GSH depletion seems to play a pivotal role. In conclusion, the present study identifies a novel mechanism contributing to SFR toxicity which - since DNA damage is a prominent mechanism underlying the cytotoxic activity of established antineoplastic agents - might help to exploit the therapeutic value of SFR in anticancer drug protocols. Copyright 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20510253     DOI: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2010.05.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  17 in total

1.  Sulforaphane suppresses the growth of glioblastoma cells, glioblastoma stem cell-like spheroids, and tumor xenografts through multiple cell signaling pathways.

Authors:  Khadijeh Bijangi-Vishehsaraei; M Reza Saadatzadeh; Haiyan Wang; Angie Nguyen; Malgorzata M Kamocka; Wenjing Cai; Aaron A Cohen-Gadol; Stacey L Halum; Jann N Sarkaria; Karen E Pollok; Ahmad R Safa
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 5.115

2.  Assessment of DNA damage and repair in adults consuming allyl isothiocyanate or Brassica vegetables.

Authors:  Craig S Charron; Beverly A Clevidence; George A Albaugh; Matthew H Kramer; Bryan T Vinyard; John A Milner; Janet A Novotny
Journal:  J Nutr Biochem       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 6.048

3.  Epigallocatechin gallate and sulforaphane combination treatment induce apoptosis in paclitaxel-resistant ovarian cancer cells through hTERT and Bcl-2 down-regulation.

Authors:  Huaping Chen; Charles N Landen; Yuanyuan Li; Ronald D Alvarez; Trygve O Tollefsbol
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 3.905

4.  Mitohormesis in muscle cells: a morphological, molecular, and proteomic approach.

Authors:  Elena Barbieri; Piero Sestili; Luciana Vallorani; Michele Guescini; Cinzia Calcabrini; Anna Maria Gioacchini; Giosuè Annibalini; Francesco Lucertini; Giovanni Piccoli; Vilberto Stocchi
Journal:  Muscles Ligaments Tendons J       Date:  2014-02-24

5.  Dietary phytochemicals, HDAC inhibition, and DNA damage/repair defects in cancer cells.

Authors:  Praveen Rajendran; Emily Ho; David E Williams; Roderick H Dashwood
Journal:  Clin Epigenetics       Date:  2011-10-26       Impact factor: 6.551

6.  Sulforaphane potentiates RNA damage induced by different xenobiotics.

Authors:  Carmela Fimognari; Monia Lenzi; Piero Sestili; Eleonora Turrini; Lorenzo Ferruzzi; Patrizia Hrelia; Giorgio Cantelli-Forti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-23       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Cytotoxic and Antitumor Activity of Sulforaphane: The Role of Reactive Oxygen Species.

Authors:  Piero Sestili; Carmela Fimognari
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-06-22       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Study of the cytotoxic effects of the new synthetic Isothiocyanate CM9 and its fullerene derivative on human T-leukemia cells.

Authors:  Elena De Gianni; Eleonora Turrini; Andrea Milelli; Francesca Maffei; Marco Carini; Anna Minarini; Vincenzo Tumiatti; Tatiana Da Ros; Maurizio Prato; Carmela Fimognari
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 4.546

9.  Sulforaphane induces oxidative stress and death by p53-independent mechanism: implication of impaired glutathione recycling.

Authors:  José Miguel P Ferreira de Oliveira; Maria Costa; Tiago Pedrosa; Pedro Pinto; Catarina Remédios; Helena Oliveira; Francisco Pimentel; Luís Almeida; Conceição Santos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Antileukemic activity of sulforaphane in primary blasts from patients affected by myelo- and lympho-proliferative disorders and in hypoxic conditions.

Authors:  Carmela Fimognari; Eleonora Turrini; Piero Sestili; Cinzia Calcabrini; Giovanni Carulli; Giulia Fontanelli; Martina Rousseau; Giorgio Cantelli-Forti; Patrizia Hrelia
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.