| Literature DB >> 20508750 |
Anne Botzung1, Kevin S Labar, Philip Kragel, Amanda Miles, David C Rubin.
Abstract
To investigate the neural systems that contribute to the formation of complex, self-relevant emotional memories, dedicated fans of rival college basketball teams watched a competitive game while undergoing functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). During a subsequent recognition memory task, participants were shown video clips depicting plays of the game, stemming either from previously-viewed game segments (targets) or from non-viewed portions of the same game (foils). After an old-new judgment, participants provided emotional valence and intensity ratings of the clips. A data driven approach was first used to decompose the fMRI signal acquired during free viewing of the game into spatially independent components. Correlations were then calculated between the identified components and post-scanning emotion ratings for successfully encoded targets. Two components were correlated with intensity ratings, including temporal lobe regions implicated in memory and emotional functions, such as the hippocampus and amygdala, as well as a midline fronto-cingulo-parietal network implicated in social cognition and self-relevant processing. These data were supported by a general linear model analysis, which revealed additional valence effects in fronto-striatal-insular regions when plays were divided into positive and negative events according to the fan's perspective. Overall, these findings contribute to our understanding of how emotional factors impact distributed neural systems to successfully encode dynamic, personally-relevant event sequences.Entities:
Keywords: affect; declarative memory; functional neuroimaging; independent components analysis; social cognition; sports psychology
Year: 2010 PMID: 20508750 PMCID: PMC2876881 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2010.00034
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Hum Neurosci ISSN: 1662-5161 Impact factor: 3.169
Mean (SD) behavioral data and reaction times (RTs, in ms) for recognition, confidence, and intensity judgments for the old items as a function of self-identified fan group (* indicates significant group difference, .
| Duke fans | UNC fans | All subjects | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Recognition | 83% (0.11) | 83% (0.11) | 83% (0.11) |
| Recognition RT | 1018 (302)* | 1445 (497) | 1231 (456) |
| Confidence | 7.01 (0.52) | 6.72 (0.76) | 6.87 (0.65) |
| Confidence RT | 1004 (193) | 1199 (462) | 1102 (360) |
| Intensity | 2.07 (0.42) | 2.19 (0.66) | 2.13 (0.54) |
| Intensity RT | 1411 (287) | 1688 (518) | 1549 (432) |
Figure 1Independent components (ICs) identified during the free viewing of the 35-min portion of the basketball game (. This figure represents the 9 IC spatial maps identified, each overlaid on the sagittal, coronal and axial planes of an anatomical template.
Figure 2Brain activity related to the two ICs that correlated with emotional intensity ratings. (A) Shows the “MTL-visual IC” (blue) and the “default network IC2” (red), and their corresponding time-courses are shown in (B). The dotted lines indicate the standard deviation.
Independent components analysis (ICA) results during free viewing that positively correlated with behavioral ratings of emotional intensity.
| L/R brain region | Coordinates ( | Cluster size | |
|---|---|---|---|
| L middle frontal gyrus (BA 8/9/6) | 6.65 | −26, 30, 41 | 121 |
| L anterior cingulate (BA 24) | 5.34 | −8, 19, 23 | 37 |
| L inferior frontal gyrus (BA 9) | 5.30 | −41, 8, 30 | 57 |
| Bilateral anterior cingulate (BA 32) | 4.66 | 4, 41, 0 | 34 |
| R middle frontal gyrus (BA 8) | 4.27 | 26, 30, 41 | 14 |
| R middle frontal gyrus (BA 46/9) | 3.85 | 41, 23, 23 | 31 |
| Bilateral lingual gyrus, cuneus, precuneus, R posterior middle temporal gyrus, R middle temporal gyrus, R hippocampus, R amygdala (BA 19/7/39/21) | 13.79 | 19, −68, −4 | 3221 |
| R precuneus (BA 7) | 7.60 | 4, −45, 53 | 463 |
| L inferior parietal lobe (BA 40) | 4.97 | −53, −34, 41 | 15 |
| L middle/inferior temporal gyri (BA 21/20) | 4.87 | −60, −23, −4 | 94 |
| L parahippocampal gyrus/amygdala | 4.77 | −23, −8, −11 | 14 |
| L superior temporal gyrus (BA 38) | 4.66 | −38, 8, −26 | 23 |
| R angular gyrus (BA 39) | 4.43 | 34, −56, 38 | 25 |
| L thalamus | 6.70 | −4, −11, 0 | 48 |
| Medial PFC, anterior cingulate gyrus, L inferior frontal gyrus, L superior temporal gyrus (BA 10/9/8/6/24/47/38) | 16.39 | 0, 60, 23 | 3879 |
| R superior temporal, inferior frontal gyri (BA 38/47) | 8.09 | 34, 19, −23 | 202 |
| R postcentral, precentral gyri (BA 3/6) | 7.59 | 41, −23, 53 | 168 |
| L precentral gyrus (BA 4) | 5.82 | −38, −23, 56 | 53 |
| Bilateral cingulate and posterior cingulate gyri, precuneus (BA 24/31/7) | 12.45 | 0, −60, 26 | 465 |
| R middle, superior, inferior temporal gyri (BA 21/22/20) | 9.76 | 60, −23, −15 | 399 |
| R lingual gyrus, cuneus (BA 18/17) | 7.13 | 4, −83, −8 | 89 |
| R parahippocampal gyrus/hippocampus (BA 27) | 5.94 | 23, −30, −8 | 71 |
| L hippocampus | 4.46 | −11, −38, 4 | 6 |
| L hippocampus | 3.86 | −23, −15, −19 | 8 |
| L thalamus | 6.04 | −11, −34, 4 | 27 |
| R striatum (caudate) | 3.77 | 11, 4, 11 | 12 |
One component included medial temporal and ventral visual areas associated with memory, emotion, and complex visual perception (MTL-visual; see Figure .
BA, Brodmann area; L, left hemisphere; PFC, prefrontal cortex; R, right hemisphere.
Results from the general linear model analysis.
| L/R brain region | Coordinates ( | Cluster size | |
|---|---|---|---|
| R inferior frontal PFC (BA 46) | 3.49 | 45, 38, 4 | 21 |
| Anterior and superior medial PFC (BA 8/9) | 3.43 | 0, 41, 49 | 73 |
| L inferior PFC (BA 47/45) | 3.36 | −49, 26, 0 | 13 |
| L parahippocampal gyrus/lingual gyrus (BA 18) | 4.29 | −15, −53, 4 | 167 |
| R parahippocampal gyrus/lingual gyrus (BA 19) | 3.91 | 19, −56, −4 | 181 |
| L temporo-parietal junction (BA 39/40) | 3.79 | −49, −68, 41 | 14 |
| L inferior temporal gyrus (BA 20) | 3.12 | −60, −34, −15 | 5 |
| R hippocampus/amygdala* | 2.79 | 34, −8, −15 | 4 |
| R middle frontal gyrus (BA 9) | 3.31 | 34, 30, 30 | 21 |
| L middle frontal gyrus (BA 6) | 3.27 | −34, 0, 53 | 5 |
| L superior temporal gyrus/inferior frontal gyrus/insula (BA 38/47/13) | 3.18 | −45, 11, −8 | 27 |
| R precuneus (BA 7) | 3.08 | 8, −34, 45 | 5 |
| R thalamus | 3.31 | 19, −23, 0 | 6 |
| L striatum (caudate) | 3.25 | −23, −34, 11 | 38 |
| R postcentral gyrus/parietal lobe (BA 5) | 3.17 | 26, −45, 68 | 6 |
| L posterior insula (BA 13) | 3.13 | −34, −26, 19 | 5 |
| R postcentral and precentral gyri (BA 3/6) | 3.10 | 49, −15, 53 | 30 |
| R striatum (caudate) | 3.49 | 4, 15, 4 | 21 |
| R amygdala | 3.19 | 15, −4, −19 | 14 |
| L inferior frontal gyrus (BA 47) | 3.14 | −34, 19, −19 | 16 |
Main effects of arousal, valence, and their interaction are indicated. Coordinates are in Montreal Neurologic Institute stereotaxic space.
BA, Brodmann area; L, left hemisphere; PFC, prefrontal cortex; R, right hemisphere.
*p < 0.005.
Figure 3Regions showing a greater difference in activity for successfully encoded positive relative to negative segments (.