Literature DB >> 20508549

Demographic factors affect Scoliosis Research Society-22 performance in healthy adolescents: a comparative baseline for adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis.

Kushagra Verma1, Baron Lonner, Jane S Hoashi, Virginie Lafage, Laura Dean, Itzhak Engel, Yael Goldstein.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective analysis.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to: (1) evaluate the influence of variable demographic factors on the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-22 performance and (2) evaluate SRS-22 performance in normal adolescents without scoliosis to establish a comparative baseline for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The SRS-22 instrument has been used widely to evaluate patients with scoliosis but no study has characterized how variable patient demographics in normal, unaffected individuals may influence SRS-22 scores.
METHODS: Healthy adolescents at a high school clinic and at referring pediatricians' private offices were asked to anonymously complete the SRS-22 instrument: 22 questions scaled 1-5 (highest). Additional questions assessed household income, race (white, Hispanic, African-American, other), gender, household status (single vs. dual parent), and body mass index. ANOVA and multivariate regression analyses were used to identify statistically significant factors (P < 0.05).
RESULTS: Four hundred fifty unaffected adolescents completed the SRS-22 (62% female, 38% male; mean age 16 (range, 9.3-21.8), mean body mass index 22.8 (range, 13.5-47.5). Mean SRS-22 performance was 4.1 ± 0.5 (Activity: 4.0 ± 0.6; Pain: 4.3 ± 0.6; Image: 4.2 ± 0.6; Mental: 3.8 ± 0.8, Mean: 4.1 ± 0.5). Whites scored higher in the activity domain than Hispanic and other ethnicities, while African Americans scored higher in the pain domain than Hispanics (P < 0.05 for both). From the lowest income range to 125,000 dollars/yr, household income had a positive effect on the activity, image and mean SRS-22 score (P < 0.05 for all). Males scored higher than females in the mental health domain and mean SRS-22 (P < 0.0001). Dual parent versus single parent households had higher activity and mean SRS-22 scores (P < 0.005).
CONCLUSION: We report that male gender, dual parent household, white race and increased household income were predictive of higher SRS-22 scores in healthy adolescents without scoliosis. The impact of these factors represents a meaningful clinical difference in SRS-22 performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20508549     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181cb474f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  14 in total

1.  How do idiopathic scoliosis patients who improve after surgery differ from those who do not exceed a minimum detectable change?

Authors:  Joan Bago; Francisco Javier Sanchez Perez-Grueso; Ferran Pellise; Esther Les
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Population-based normative data for the Scoliosis Research Society 22r questionnaire in adolescents and adults, including a comparison with EQ-5D.

Authors:  Elias Diarbakerli; Anna Grauers; Paul Gerdhem
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Operative treatment of chance injuries in the paediatric population.

Authors:  Sean Suttor; Randolph Gray; Corrine Bridge; Andrew Cree
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  The body image disturbance questionnaire-scoliosis better correlates to quality of life measurements than the spinal assessment questionnaire in pediatric idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Jennifer M Bauer
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2021-04-30

5.  Impact of Surgery on the Quality of Life of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

Authors:  Pedro Fernandes; Joaquim Soares Do Brito; Isabel Flores; Jacinto Monteiro
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2019

6.  Factors affecting the outcome in appearance of AIS surgery in terms of the minimal clinically important difference.

Authors:  James T Bennett; Amer F Samdani; Tracey P Bastrom; Robert J Ames; Firoz Miyanji; Joshua M Pahys; Michelle C Marks; Baron S Lonner; Peter O Newton; Harry L Shufflebarger; Burt Yaszay; John M Flynn; Randal R Betz; Patrick J Cahill
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Body image in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: validation of the Body Image Disturbance Questionnaire--Scoliosis Version.

Authors:  Joshua D Auerbach; Baron S Lonner; Canice E Crerand; Suken A Shah; John M Flynn; Tracey Bastrom; Phedra Penn; Jennifer Ahn; Courtney Toombs; Neil Bharucha; Whitney P Bowe; Peter O Newton
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 8.  Outcome instruments to assess scoliosis surgery.

Authors:  Juan Bagó; Jose Ma Climent; Francisco J S Pérez-Grueso; Ferran Pellisé
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Pain Trajectories Following Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Correction: Analysis of Predictors and Functional Outcomes.

Authors:  Kristen M Bailey; Jason J Howard; Ron El-Hawary; Jill Chorney
Journal:  JB JS Open Access       Date:  2021-04-30

10.  Effects of living environment on the postoperative Scoliosis Research Society-24 results in females with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Ewa Misterska; Maciej Głowacki; Sławomir Panek; Anna Ignyś-O'Byrne; Jakub Głowacki; Iwona Ignyś; Hanna Krauss; Jacek Piątek
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2012-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.