Literature DB >> 20508466

Short-term effect of strength training with and without superimposed electrical stimulation on muscle strength and anaerobic performance. A randomized controlled trial. Part I.

Azael J Herrero1, Juan Martín, Teresa Martín, Olaia Abadía, Beatriz Fernández, David García-López.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare strength training with and without superimposed electromyostimulation (EMS) on muscle strength and anaerobic power. Twenty-eight subjects were assigned to: weight+EMS (ES), weight (VOL), or control group (CG). ES and VOL performed 4 training sessions per week during 4 weeks on a knee extension machine (8 sets; 8 repetitions; 1-second concentric phase from 90 degrees to 0 degrees, 1-second eccentric phase from 0 degrees to 90 degrees , 1-second rest at 90 degrees; 3-minute rest between sets; 70% maximal voluntary contraction). Group ES received EMS in the concentric phase of each action (120 Hz, 400 microseconds). Before training, after training, and 2 weeks after the end of the training (detraining), maximal voluntary contraction, squat jump, countermovement jump (CMJ), countermovement jump with free arms (CMJA), and 20-m sprint time were analyzed. After the training period, ES and VOL increased their muscle strength (40.2% and 31.4%, respectively, p<0.001). After the detraining period, this gain remained above baseline values for ES and VOL (49.1% and 24.5%, respectively, p<0.001). Changes in muscle strength between baseline and detraining were higher in ES than in VOL (p<0.01). Anaerobic performance was not affected by training in any group, but percentage change between baseline and after training suggests that the CMJ and CMJA with free arms performance were impaired in ES with respect to VOL and CG. Superimposed EMS onto voluntary contractions increases strength more than voluntary training alone; nevertheless, a detraining period should be respected to observe this delayed adaptation. To improve anaerobic power with superimposed EMS, a complementary and specific work such as plyometrics should be carried out.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20508466     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181dc427e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  10 in total

1.  Improving Functional Performance and Muscle Power 4-to-6 Months After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Sabrine Souissi; Del P Wong; Alexandre Dellal; Jean-Louis Croisier; Zied Ellouze; Karim Chamari
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 2.988

2.  Effects of electrostimulation and plyometric training program combination on jump height in teenage athletes.

Authors:  Emilio J Martínez-López; Elisa Benito-Martínez; Fidel Hita-Contreras; Amador Lara-Sánchez; Antonio Martínez-Amat
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 2.988

Review 3.  Is high-frequency neuromuscular electrical stimulation a suitable tool for muscle performance improvement in both healthy humans and athletes?

Authors:  Julien Gondin; Patrick J Cozzone; David Bendahan
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-09-10       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Effects of Loaded Squat Exercise with and without Application of Superimposed EMS on Physical Performance.

Authors:  Nicolas Wirtz; Christoph Zinner; Ulrike Doermann; Heinz Kleinoeder; Joachim Mester
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 2.988

5.  Eccentric training combined to neuromuscular electrical stimulation is not superior to eccentric training alone for quadriceps strengthening in healthy subjects: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Claudia Ferreira Gomes da Silva; Felipe Xavier de Lima E Silva; Karoline Baptista Vianna; Gabriel Dos Santos Oliveira; Marco Aurélio Vaz; Bruno Manfredini Baroni
Journal:  Braz J Phys Ther       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 3.377

6.  Effects of Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation on Countermovement Jump and Squat Performance Speed in Male Soccer Players: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Gracia María Gallego-Sendarrubias; José Luis Arias-Buría; Edurne Úbeda-D'Ocasar; Juan Pablo Hervás-Pérez; Manuel Antonio Rubio-Palomino; César Fernández-de-Las-Peñas; Juan Antonio Valera-Calero
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 4.241

7.  Electromyostimulation to fight atrophy and to build muscle: facts and numbers.

Authors:  Volker Adams
Journal:  J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 12.910

8.  The Impact of Whole-Body Electromyostimulation on Body Posture and Trunk Muscle Strength in Untrained Persons.

Authors:  Oliver Ludwig; Joshua Berger; Stephan Becker; Wolfgang Kemmler; Michael Fröhlich
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 4.566

9.  Training Based on Electrical Stimulation Superimposed Onto Voluntary Contraction Would be Relevant Only as Part of Submaximal Contractions in Healthy Subjects.

Authors:  Thierry Paillard
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 4.566

10.  Effects of Whole-Body Electromyostimulation on Strength-, Sprint-, and Jump Performance in Moderately Trained Young Adults: A Mini-Meta-Analysis of Five Homogenous RCTs of Our Work Group.

Authors:  Nicolas Wirtz; Ulrike Dörmann; Florian Micke; André Filipovic; Heinz Kleinöder; Lars Donath
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 4.566

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.