| Literature DB >> 20508037 |
Heather A Niederer1, Lisa C Willcocks, Tim F Rayner, Wanling Yang, Yu Lung Lau, Thomas N Williams, J Anthony G Scott, Britta C Urban, Norbert Peshu, Sarah J Dunstan, Tran Tinh Hien, Nguyen Hoan Phu, Leonid Padyukov, Iva Gunnarsson, Elisabet Svenungsson, Caroline O Savage, Richard A Watts, Paul A Lyons, David G Clayton, Kenneth G C Smith.
Abstract
The response of a leukocyte to immune complexes (ICs) is modulated by receptors for the Fc region of IgG (FcgammaRs), and alterations in their affinity or function have been associated with risk of autoimmune diseases, including systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The low-affinity FcgammaR genomic locus is complex, containing regions of copy number variation (CNV) which can alter receptor expression and leukocyte responses to IgG. Combined paralogue ratio tests (PRTs) were used to distinguish three intervals within the FCGR locus which undergo CNV, and to determine FCGR gene copy number (CN). There were significant differences in FCGR3B and FCGR3A CNV profiles between Caucasian, East Asian and Kenyan populations. A previously noted association of low FCGR3B CN with SLE in Caucasians was supported [OR = 1.57 (1.08-2.27), P = 0.018], and replicated in Chinese [OR = 1.65 (1.25-2.18), P = 4 x 10(-4)]. There was no association of FCGR3B CNV with vasculitis, nor with malarial or bacterial infection. Linkage disequilibrium (LD) between multi-allelic FCGR3B CNV and SLE-associated SNPs in the FCGR locus was defined for the first time. Despite LD between FCGR3B CNV and a variant in FcgammaRIIB (I232T) which abolishes inhibitory function, both reduced CN of FCGR3B and homozygosity of the FcgammaRIIB-232T allele were individually strongly associated with SLE risk. Thus CN of FCGR3B, which controls IC responses and uptake by neutrophils, and variations in FCGR2B, which controls factors such as antibody production and macrophage activation, are important in SLE pathogenesis. Further interpretations of contributions to pathogenesis by FcgammaRs must be made in the context of LD involving CNV regions.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20508037 PMCID: PMC2908468 DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddq216
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Hum Mol Genet ISSN: 0964-6906 Impact factor: 6.150
Figure 1.CNV and paralogue ratio test (PRT) in the FCGR l ocus. A segmental duplication resulted in the production of FCGR3B, as well as FCGR2C which combines the 5′ end of FCGR2B and the 3′ end for FCGR2A. Repeated black, grey and white regions reflect areas of homology within the genes. The PRT primer pairs used in this study to determine copy number variation (CNV) are PRT-2C3′/2A3′ (circle) and PRT-3B/3A (square), which each bind at and amplify two locations in the genome on Chromosome 1; and PRT-3(A+B)/Chr18 (triangle) which binds at three locations—two on chromosome 1 and one on chromosome 18. Relative gene locations are derived from the Database of Genomic Variants, human genome build 36 (hg18). Three CNV regions are identified by variation at PRT primer binding sites (marked): CNR1 (blue) includes CNV at the PRT primer sites in FCGR2C and FCGR3B; CNR2 (red) includes CNV at the PRT primer sites in FCGR2A 3′-UTR and FCGR3A, but not in FCGR2C 3′-UTR; and CNR3 (green) includes CNV at the PRT primer sites in FCGR3A and FCGR2C 3′-UTR. Solid colour bars indicate areas suggested to be included in the CNV interval and thin grey lines indicate maximum plausible extent. Diploid copy number variations of each region observed in this study are noted, with other probable variations in brackets. For further details of the relationship between relative PRT product, underlying gene CN and CNV regions, see Supplementary data online.
Figure 2.Ethnic differences in FCGR3B and FCGR3A CN profiles. (A) Distribution of copy number of FCGR3B in four control cohorts from different ethnic backgrounds. The Caucasian controls are from the UK cohort. Statistical differences between the populations are tested for FCGR3B diploid copy number <2 or >2 versus the remainder, and the P-value for a Fisher's exact test is shown. (B) Distribution of copy number of FCGR3A in the four control cohorts from different ethnic backgrounds. Statistical differences between the populations are tested for 1 versus 2,3 diploid copy number, and the significance for a Chi-squared test of independence (df = 2) is shown. Bold values show the significant P-value.
Figure 3.Association of FCGR3B CN with SLE and vasculitis. (A) Distribution of copy number of FCGR3B in three systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) case cohorts compared with their controls: UK Caucasian, Swedish (SW) Caucasian and Hong Kong (HK) Chinese. The HK Chinese cases were subsequently split into those with (+neph) and without (−neph) nephritis. Numbers of individuals in each cohort are noted. Statistical significance for a difference between cases and controls was tested for FCGR3B diploid copy number of <2 or >2 versus the remainder by a Fisher's exact test. OR, odds ratio (95% confidence interval); P, significance value. Bold values show the significant P-value. (B) Meta-analysis (random effects model) of <2 versus 2,3 and 4 diploid copies of FCGR3B between SLE cases and controls in all three SLE cohorts (main graph) or Caucasian cohorts alone (bar on right). Box size is proportional to sample size. (C) Distribution of copy number of FCGR3B in an ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV) Caucasian cohort and controls. Controls included those used as controls for the UK SLE cohort.
Figure 4.No association of FCGR3B CN with malaria or bacterial sepsis. Distribution of copy number of FCGR3B in four case cohorts compared with cord blood controls. A single Kenyan control group is used for all three Kenyan case cohorts. Numbers of individuals in each cohort are noted. Statistical significance for a difference between cases and controls are tested for FCGR3B diploid copy number of <2 or >2. P, significance value for a Fisher's exact test.
Figure 5.Linkage disequilibrium (LD) in the FCGR locus. LD in normal individuals between FCGR3B copy number variation (CNV) and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) previously associated with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) was determined by haplotype-based methods (D′) and genotype-based methods [correlation (Gcor) and covariance (Gcov)]. Colours indicate increasing level of LD. Split colour bars indicate variation in LD when either high or low FCGR3B CN was compared. #Combined genotype involving two SLE risk diplotypes (FCGR2A-131R/R, FCGR3A-176F/F, FCGR2B-232T/T, or FCGR3B-low CN) is enriched. *Combined genotype involving one SLE risk and one non-risk diplotype is enriched. All individuals are from the control cohorts used in association studies.
FCGR3B CN stratified by FCGR2B-I293T type
| UK and Swedish Caucasiana | Hong Kong Chinese | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SLE, | Cont, | OR (95% CI) | SLE, | Cont, | OR (95% CI) | |||
| 418 | 595 | 745 | 914 | |||||
| 0,1 | 49 | 45 | 1.55 (1.02–2.37) | 117 | 89 | 1.73 (1.29–2.32) | ||
| 3,4 | 43 | 66 | 0.93 (0.62–1.39) | 0.76 | 100 | 134 | 0.90 (0.68–1.19) | 0.48 |
| 297 | 472 | 432 | 495 | |||||
| 0,1 | 28 | 33 | 1.35 (0.79–2.28) | 0.28 | 48 | 44 | 1.29 (0.84–1.99) | 0.27 |
| 3,4 | 32 | 59 | 0.86 (0.55–1.36) | 0.57 | 73 | 87 | 0.95 (0.68–1.34) | 0.79 |
| 89 | 106 | 260 | 366 | |||||
| 0,1 | 15 | 6 | 2.98 (1.11–8.00) | 55 | 37 | 2.39 (1.52–3.75) | ||
| 3,4 | 7 | 6 | 1.39 (0.45–4.29) | 0.58 | 26 | 43 | 0.83 (0.50–1.40) | 0.52 |
| 32 | 17 | 53 | 53 | |||||
| 0,1 | 6 | 6 | 0.53 (0.15–1.90) | 0.34 | 14 | 8 | 2.02 (0.77–5.32) | 0.2 |
| 3,4 | 4 | 1 | 2.13 (0.22–20.6) | 0.65 | 1 | 4 | 0.24 (0.03–2.18) | 0.36 |
| Breslow–Day test of heterogeneity | 0.056 | 0.14 | ||||||
CN, copy number (diploid); SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus; cont, control; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.
aCombined Caucasian group: the sum of UK Caucasian and Swedish Caucasian cohorts.
bFCGR2B-232 I/I, FCGR2B-232 I/T, or FCGR2B-232 T/T indicates the stratification of the data before the association of <2 or >2 diploid copies of FCGR3B with SLE is tested by Fisher's exact test. All individuals are FCGR3A CN = 2.
Bold values show the statistical significance at the 95% level.
Logistic regression to test of independence of FCGR3B CN and FCGR2B-I232T risk in SLE
| HK Chinese | Caucasiana | HK Chinese | Caucasian | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TT versus IT/II | 0,1 versus 2,3,4 | ||||
| 1 | 0.142 | 1 | |||
| 2 | 0.211 | 2 | |||
| OR (95%CI) | 1.28 (0.87–1.87) | 2.72 (1.48–4.99) | OR (95%CI) | 1.67 (1.26–2.22) | 1.55 (1.01–2.38) |
| Interaction | |||||
| 3 | 0.948 | 0.047 | |||
HK, Hong Kong; P χ2, P-value of the Chi-square test statistic; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; 1,2,3 denote the order in which effects are adjusted for.
Combined Caucasian group, comprised of UK Caucasian and Swedish Caucasian cohorts, in which the factor ‘group’ is used to take into account differences between the cohorts prior to determining risk due to FCGR2B or FCGR3B.
Bold values show the statistical significance at the 95% level.
| PRT pair | Primer | Annealing (°C) | Elongation (s) | Product size (bp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FOR 5′-CTTCATGAATTGCGCCTCAG | 67 | 20 | FCGR2C 274 | |
| REV 5′-GCTAGAGGCCAGAAGTTCGAG | FCGR2A 279 | |||
| FOR 5′-GATGTCCACGAATCCACTGG | 65 | 30 | FCGR3B 304 | |
| REV 5′-GACAGGAACTCTTTACCTTCCTCG | FCGR3A 296 | |||
| FOR 5′-TGCCCTTCATGATCTGGCC | 60 | 5 | FCGR3B/3A 75 | |
| REV 5′-TGAGTTCAAGAAAGCAGTTTG | Chr18 86 |