Literature DB >> 20506991

Anterior chamber depth measurement in pseudophakic eyes: a comparison of Pentacam and ultrasound.

Giacomo Savini1, Thomas Olsen, Claudio Carbonara, Sebastiano Pazzaglia, Piero Barboni, Michele Carbonelli, Kenneth J Hoffer.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the anterior chamber depth (ACD) measurements of a Scheimpflug camera (Pentacam, Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH) and immersion ultrasound biometry (UltraScan Imaging System, Alcon Laboratories) in pseudophakic eyes.
METHODS: This prospective, multicenter study included three independent sample groups. The ACD, defined as the distance between the corneal epithelium and intraocular lens anterior surface, was assessed by ultrasound biometry. Two Pentacam ACD measurements were evaluated--the value automatically provided by the internal software and a manual measurement obtained by moving the software calipers on a single Scheimpflug image.
RESULTS: For the comparison group (12 eyes), no significant difference between the mean ultrasound biometry and mean Pentacam manual measurement (4.51+/-0.34 mm and 4.50+/-0.34 mm, respectively, P>.05) was noted, whereas the mean automatic value was significantly higher (4.94+/-0.41 mm, P=.0002), as the posterior edge of the anterior chamber is erroneously identified as coinciding with the boundary of the posterior capsule. A strong correlation was found between Pentacam manual measurements and ultrasound biometry (r=0.98, P<.0001); this correlation was confirmed by the confirmation group (17 eyes), whose mean values were 4.76+/-0.39 mm and 4.72+/-0.37 mm, respectively (r=0.98, P<.0001). After merging the data for the comparison and confirmation groups, the difference between Pentacam manual measurements (4.65+/-0.38 mm) and ultrasound readings (4.63+/-0.38 mm) was not statistically significant. For the assessment group (15 eyes), relative repeatability and reproducibility of Pentacam manual measurements were 1.17% and 1.59%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: In pseudophakic eyes, the Pentacam provides ACD values that do not statistically differ from those of ultrasound immersion biometry, on the condition that manual measurements are used rather than automatic ones. Copyright 2010, SLACK Incorporated.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20506991     DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20090617-02

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Refract Surg        ISSN: 1081-597X            Impact factor:   3.573


  6 in total

Review 1.  Clinically relevant biometry.

Authors:  Afsun Sahin; Pedram Hamrah
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 3.761

2.  Immersion Biometry for Intraocular Lens Power Calculation with Fourth-Generation Formulas.

Authors:  Janusz Skrzypecki; Iwona Grabska-Liberek; Maria Guszkowska; Justyna Izdebska; Jacek P Szaflik
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-07-28

3.  Comparison of Anterior Chamber Depth Measurements from the Galilei Dual Scheimpflug Analyzer with IOLMaster.

Authors:  Roma P Patel; Rahul T Pandit
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 1.909

4.  Comparison of corneal curvature and anterior chamber depth measurements using the manual keratometer, Lenstar LS 900 and the Pentacam.

Authors:  Omür Ö Uçakhan; Veysel Akbel; Zeynep Bıyıklı; Ayfer Kanpolat
Journal:  Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013 Jul-Sep

5.  Intraocular Pressure and Anterior Segment Morphometry Changes after Uneventful Phacoemulsification in Type 2 Diabetic and Nondiabetic Patients.

Authors:  João N Beato; David Reis; João Esteves-Leandro; Manuel Falcão; Vítor Rosas; Ângela Carneiro; Fernando Falcão Reis
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 1.909

6.  Distinct differences in anterior chamber configuration and peripheral aberrations in negative dysphotopsia.

Authors:  Luc van Vught; Gregorius P M Luyten; Jan-Willem M Beenakker
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 3.351

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.