Literature DB >> 20506460

Nonfatal construction industry-related injuries treated in hospital emergency departments in the United States, 1998-2005.

Ashley L Schoenfisch1, Hester J Lipscomb, Kirill Shishlov, Douglas J Myers.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study documented the burden of nonfatal construction industry work-related injuries treated in hospital emergency departments in the United States (US) from 1998 through 2005 and described injured worker demographics and injury characteristics.
METHODS: Data from the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System work-related injury supplement (NEISS-Work) were used to identify and describe construction industry-related injuries. Rates were estimated using data from the Current Population Survey.
RESULTS: An estimated 3,216,800 (95% CI 2,241,400-4,192,200) construction industry-related injuries were seen in US emergency departments during the 8-year period; this represented an injury rate of 410/10,000 full-time equivalents and suggests that there are a greater number of construction injuries than reported through the Bureau of Labor Statistics' Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses (BLS SOII). Common characteristics included diagnoses of laceration, sprain/strain, and contusion/abrasion; events of contact with an object/equipment, bodily reaction/exertion, and falls; and sources of injury of parts/materials; structures/surfaces; and tools/instruments/equipment. The upper extremities were most often affected.
CONCLUSIONS: These data highlight the high burden of nonfatal construction industry-related injuries. The limitations of national occupational injury data sources inherent in relying on OSHA logs highlight the utility of NEISS-Work data in occupational injury research. While data captured from emergency departments are not immune to factors that influence whether a worker or an employer reports an injury as work-related or files a workers' compensation claim, emergency department data as collected through NEISS-Work do not rely on employer involvement in order to be classified as work-related. 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20506460     DOI: 10.1002/ajim.20829

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ind Med        ISSN: 0271-3586            Impact factor:   2.214


  7 in total

Review 1.  An aging workforce and injury in the construction industry.

Authors:  Natalie V Schwatka; Lesley M Butler; John R Rosecrance
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 6.222

2.  Multimodal noninvasive monitoring of soft tissue wound healing.

Authors:  Michael Bodo; Timothy Settle; Joseph Royal; Eric Lombardini; Evelyn Sawyer; Stephen W Rothwell
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2013-07-06       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  Age in relation to worker compensation costs in the construction industry.

Authors:  Natalie V Schwatka; Lesley M Butler; John C Rosecrance
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 2.214

4.  Occupational burns treated in emergency departments.

Authors:  Audrey A Reichard; Srinivas Konda; Larry L Jackson
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.214

5.  The impact of job control on employee perception of management commitment to safety.

Authors:  Clint Pinion; Shelley Brewer; David Douphrate; Lawrence Whitehead; Jami DelliFraine; Wendell C Taylor; Jim Klyza
Journal:  Saf Sci       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 6.392

6.  Off-road truck-related accidents in U.S. mines.

Authors:  Saeid R Dindarloo; Jonisha P Pollard; Elnaz Siami-Irdemoosa
Journal:  J Safety Res       Date:  2016-07-25

7.  They built this city-construction workers injured in Delhi, India: cross-sectional analysis of First Information Reports of the Delhi Police 2016-2018.

Authors:  Phil Edwards; Sajjan Yadav; Jonathan Bartlett; John Porter
Journal:  Inj Epidemiol       Date:  2022-07-21
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.