OBJECTIVE: To examine clinical characteristics as possible predictors of long-term treatment continuation with adalimumab, etanercept, and infliximab in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients who had never taken biologics treated in clinical practice. METHODS: Patients in southern Sweden with active AS starting biologic therapy for the first time between October 1999 and December 2008 (n = 243, 75% men) were included in a structured clinical followup over 2 years. Patients with clinical spondylitis had not responded to at least 2 nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, whereas patients who also had peripheral arthritis (n = 121) had additionally failed at least 1 conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) treatment course. The mean ± SD age at inclusion was 43 ± 12 years, with a mean ± SD disease duration prior to treatment of 16 ± 12 years. RESULTS: The 2-year drug continuation rate was 74%. Male sex (hazard ratio [HR] of premature discontinuation 0.36 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.19-0.68]) and the presence of peripheral arthritis (HR 0.49 [95% CI 0.27-0.88]) were found to be significant predictors of better drug survival. Furthermore, a trend was seen for more favorable drug continuation on treatment with etanercept as compared with infliximab (HR 0.50 [95% CI 0.25-1.04], P = 0.062), whereas no differences were found comparing the 3 anti-tumor necrosis factor agents in other ways. Higher baseline C-reactive protein level (HR 0.99 [95% CI 0.97-1.00], P = 0.12) and concomitant treatment with nonbiologic DMARDs (HR 0.61 [95% CI 0.34-1.10], P = 0.10) also showed trends to entail better drug adherence. CONCLUSION: AS patients in this study have an excellent 2-year drug survival rate of 74%. Significant predictors for treatment continuation in this study were male sex and the presence of peripheral arthritis.
OBJECTIVE: To examine clinical characteristics as possible predictors of long-term treatment continuation with adalimumab, etanercept, and infliximab in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients who had never taken biologics treated in clinical practice. METHODS:Patients in southern Sweden with active AS starting biologic therapy for the first time between October 1999 and December 2008 (n = 243, 75% men) were included in a structured clinical followup over 2 years. Patients with clinical spondylitis had not responded to at least 2 nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, whereas patients who also had peripheral arthritis (n = 121) had additionally failed at least 1 conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) treatment course. The mean ± SD age at inclusion was 43 ± 12 years, with a mean ± SD disease duration prior to treatment of 16 ± 12 years. RESULTS: The 2-year drug continuation rate was 74%. Male sex (hazard ratio [HR] of premature discontinuation 0.36 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.19-0.68]) and the presence of peripheral arthritis (HR 0.49 [95% CI 0.27-0.88]) were found to be significant predictors of better drug survival. Furthermore, a trend was seen for more favorable drug continuation on treatment with etanercept as compared with infliximab (HR 0.50 [95% CI 0.25-1.04], P = 0.062), whereas no differences were found comparing the 3 anti-tumornecrosis factor agents in other ways. Higher baseline C-reactive protein level (HR 0.99 [95% CI 0.97-1.00], P = 0.12) and concomitant treatment with nonbiologic DMARDs (HR 0.61 [95% CI 0.34-1.10], P = 0.10) also showed trends to entail better drug adherence. CONCLUSION: AS patients in this study have an excellent 2-year drug survival rate of 74%. Significant predictors for treatment continuation in this study were male sex and the presence of peripheral arthritis.
Authors: U Kiltz; J Sieper; H Kellner; D Krause; M Rudwaleit; J-F Chenot; A Stallmach; S Jaresch; J Braun Journal: Z Rheumatol Date: 2014-09 Impact factor: 1.372
Authors: M Fabris; L Quartuccio; C Fabro; S Sacco; S Lombardi; R Ramonda; D Biasi; D Punzi; S Adami; I Olivieri; F Curcio; S De Vita Journal: Pharmacogenomics J Date: 2015-07-07 Impact factor: 3.550
Authors: U Kiltz; J Braun; A Becker; J-F Chenot; M Dreimann; L Hammel; A Heiligenhaus; K-G Hermann; R Klett; D Krause; K-F Kreitner; U Lange; A Lauterbach; W Mau; R Mössner; U Oberschelp; S Philipp; U Pleyer; M Rudwaleit; E Schneider; T L Schulte; J Sieper; A Stallmach; B Swoboda; M Winking Journal: Z Rheumatol Date: 2019-12 Impact factor: 1.372
Authors: Pascal Zufferey; Jacqueline Ghosn; Fabio Becce; Adrian Ciurea; Bérengère Aubry-Rozier; Axel Finckh; Alexander K So Journal: Rheumatol Int Date: 2014-07-29 Impact factor: 2.631
Authors: Suzanne Arends; Elisabeth Brouwer; Eveline van der Veer; Henk Groen; Martha K Leijsma; Pieternella M Houtman; Tim L Th A Jansen; Cees G M Kallenberg; Anneke Spoorenberg Journal: Arthritis Res Ther Date: 2011-06-20 Impact factor: 5.156