Literature DB >> 20506184

Lifetime trajectory of physical activity according to energy expenditure and joint force.

Charles R Ratzlaff1, Paul Doerfling, Gavin Steininger, Mieke Koehoorn, Jolanda Cibere, Matt Liang, David R Wilson, John Esdaile, Jacek Kopec.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop and demonstrate the feasibility of a method for estimating lifetime hip and knee cumulative joint force using survey data on physical activity, and to construct and describe lifetime trajectories of energy expenditure and hip and knee joint force.
METHODS: Exposure data on lifetime physical activity, including type (occupational, household, and recreation) and dose (frequency, intensity, and duration), were collected from a Canada-wide population study of adults ages ≥45 years. Subjects were ranked in 2 ways: in terms of physical activity-related energy expenditure and in terms of a cumulative peak force index (CPFI) for the hip and knee, which is a measure of lifetime exposure and is a time/joint force product involving years of force and subject bodyweight. A relative joint loading index was calculated as the ratio of joint force (CPFI score) to energy expenditure.
RESULTS: A total of 4,269 subjects completed the baseline measurements. Lifetime energy expenditure and hip and knee CPFI scores were higher for occupational and household activity than sport. The mean lifetime energy expenditure from total physical activity in the study sample was 119.1 metabolic equivalent-hours/week. Women had slightly higher total lifetime energy expenditure and CPFI scores than men. The relative joint loading index was highest for male household and sport activity and lowest for female occupational activity.
CONCLUSION: Lifetime cumulative hip/knee joint force trajectories were successfully constructed from survey data and followed expected trends. Comparing energy expenditure with joint force revealed variation by age, sex, and activity type, indicating these measures may help distinguish the numerous benefits of physical activity from possible risks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20506184     DOI: 10.1002/acr.20243

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)        ISSN: 2151-464X            Impact factor:   4.794


  5 in total

1.  Physical activity, body mass index and bone mineral density-associations in a prospective population-based cohort of women and men: the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos).

Authors:  L Langsetmo; C L Hitchcock; E J Kingwell; K S Davison; C Berger; S Forsmo; W Zhou; N Kreiger; J C Prior
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 4.398

2.  Occupational physical loading tasks and knee osteoarthritis: a review of the evidence.

Authors:  Allison M Ezzat; Linda C Li
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.037

3.  Physical Activity During the Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic: Prevention of a Decline in Metabolic and Immunological Functions.

Authors:  Johan Jakobsson; Christer Malm; Maria Furberg; Ulf Ekelund; Michael Svensson
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2020-04-30

4.  Is lifelong knee joint force from work, home, and sport related to knee osteoarthritis?

Authors:  Charles R Ratzlaff; Mieke Koehoorn; Jolanda Cibere; Jacek A Kopec
Journal:  Int J Rheumatol       Date:  2012-07-17

5.  Associations between sedentary time, physical activity and bone health among older people using compositional data analysis.

Authors:  Irene Rodríguez-Gómez; Asier Mañas; José Losa-Reyna; Leocadio Rodríguez-Mañas; Sebastien F M Chastin; Luis M Alegre; Francisco J García-García; Ignacio Ara
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.