Literature DB >> 20505061

Effect of anesthesia and sedation on pediatric MR imaging patient flow.

Sonya A Vanderby1, Paul S Babyn, Michael W Carter, Susan M Jewell, Patricia D McKeever.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the effect of sedative and anesthetic administration on the duration and costs of pediatric magnetic resonance (MR) imaging.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study was approved by the institutional research ethics board; informed consent and/or assent was obtained from all participants or their parents. A patient flow study was conducted in a pediatric MR imaging clinic in which research assistants tracked participants' progress through the clinic. Demographic, visit process, and medication information was collected for 237 participants, categorized as awake, sedated, or anesthetized. The data were analyzed to (a) determine total visit duration differences, (b) investigate variations in visit stage durations according to patient type, and (c) estimate visit costs on the basis of human resource and medication use. Linear regression, the Shapiro-Wilk test, the two-tailed t test, and the nonparametric Mann-Whitney test were used.
RESULTS: Complete data sets were obtained for 148 awake, 28 sedated, and 27 anesthetized participants. Data revealed 12 stage sequences among patient visits; dominant sequences differed according to patient category. An awake patient's average visit duration (2 hours 21 minutes) differed significantly from that of sedated (3 hours 38 minutes, P < .001) and anesthetized (4 hours 7 minutes, P < .001) patients; sedated and anesthetized visit durations did not differ significantly (P < .073), although this finding may be attributable to the small sample sizes. Variation in stage durations was also evident within and among patient types. Visit costs for sedated and anesthetized patients were 3.24 and 9.56 times higher, respectively, than those for awake patients. Costs for anesthetized patients were 2.95 times higher than those for sedated patients.
CONCLUSION: Visit durations were significantly longer for anesthetized and sedated patients. Anesthetized patients incurred the highest costs, followed by sedated patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20505061     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.10091124

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  28 in total

1.  Performance characteristics of magnetic resonance imaging without contrast agents or sedation in pediatric appendicitis.

Authors:  Ryne A Didier; Katharine L Hopkins; Fergus V Coakley; Sanjay Krishnaswami; David M Spiro; Bryan R Foster
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2017-06-19

Review 2.  Paediatric MRI under sedation: is it necessary? What is the evidence for the alternatives?

Authors:  Andrea D Edwards; Owen J Arthurs
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2011-06-16

3.  Cost minimization analysis of two treatment regimens for low-risk rhabdomyosarcoma in children: a report from the Children's Oncology Group.

Authors:  Heidi Russell; J Michael Swint; Lincy Lal; Jane Meza; David Walterhouse; Douglas S Hawkins; M Fatih Okcu
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 3.167

4.  Diagnostic equivalency of fast T2 and FLAIR sequences for pediatric brain MRI: a pilot study.

Authors:  Camilo Jaimes; Edward Yang; Pauline Connaughton; Caroline D Robson; Richard L Robertson
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2019-12-20

5.  Easing anxiety in preparation for pediatric magnetic resonance imaging: a pilot study using animal-assisted therapy.

Authors:  Manuela Perez; Claire Cuscaden; Joanne F Somers; Nicole Simms; Sabia Shaheed; Leah A Kehoe; Stephanie A Holowka; Albert A Aziza; Manohar M Shroff; Mary-Louise C Greer
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2019-04-27

6.  How to Provide Gadolinium-Free PET/MR Cancer Staging of Children and Young Adults in Less than 1 h: the Stanford Approach.

Authors:  Anne M Muehe; Ashok J Theruvath; Lillian Lai; Maryam Aghighi; Andrew Quon; Samantha J Holdsworth; Jia Wang; Sandra Luna-Fineman; Neyssa Marina; Ranjana Advani; Jarrett Rosenberg; Heike E Daldrup-Link
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 3.488

7.  A randomized controlled trial: child life services in pediatric imaging.

Authors:  Mary E Tyson; Daniel D Bohl; Johan G Blickman
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2014-05-07

Review 8.  Fast, free-breathing and motion-minimized techniques for pediatric body magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Camilo Jaimes; John E Kirsch; Michael S Gee
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2018-08-04

Review 9.  [Nonoperating room anesthesia].

Authors:  J Kramer; M Malsy; B Sinner; B M Graf
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 1.041

10.  Safety of cardiac magnetic resonance and contrast angiography for neonates and small infants: a 10-year single-institution experience.

Authors:  Sheela Rangamani; Joby Varghese; Ling Li; Lisa Harvey; James M Hammel; Scott E Fletcher; Kim F Duncan; David A Danford; Shelby Kutty
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2012-08-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.