Literature DB >> 20503742

Does your neighbor's income affect your happiness?

Glenn Firebaugh1, Matthew B Schroeder.   

Abstract

The relative income or income status hypothesis implies that people should be happier when they live among the poor. Findings on neighborhood effects suggest, however, that living in a poorer neighborhood reduces, not enhances, a person's happiness. Using data from the American National Election Study linked to income data from the U.S. census, the authors find that Americans tend to be happier when they reside in richer neighborhoods (consistent with neighborhood studies) in poorer counties (as predicted by the relative income hypothesis). Thus it appears that individuals in fact are happier when they live among the poor, as long as the poor do not live too close.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20503742      PMCID: PMC4041613          DOI: 10.1086/603534

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJS        ISSN: 0002-9602


  5 in total

1.  Positive emotions in early life and longevity: findings from the nun study.

Authors:  D D Danner; D A Snowdon; W V Friesen
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2001-05

2.  Self-reported happiness in life and suicide in ensuing 20 years.

Authors:  H Koivumaa-Honkanen; R Honkanen; M Koskenvuo; J Kaprio
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.328

3.  Happiness and success: genes, families, and the psychological effects of socioeconomic position and social support.

Authors:  Jason Schnittker
Journal:  AJS       Date:  2008

4.  Social comparisons of income in one's community: evidence from national surveys of income and happiness.

Authors:  M R Hagerty
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2000-04

5.  Beyond the Census Tract: Patterns and Determinants of Racial Segregation at Multiple Geographic Scales.

Authors:  Barrett A Lee; Sean F Reardon; Glenn Firebaugh; Chad R Farrell; Stephen A Matthews; David O'Sullivan
Journal:  Am Sociol Rev       Date:  2008-10
  5 in total
  9 in total

1.  Does intergenerational mobility shape psychological distress? Sorokin revisited.

Authors:  Jason N Houle; Molly A Martin
Journal:  Res Soc Stratif Mobil       Date:  2011-06-01

2.  Race and space in the 1990s: changes in the geographic scale of racial residential segregation, 1990-2000.

Authors:  Sean F Reardon; Chad R Farrell; Stephen A Matthews; David O'Sullivan; Kendra Bischoff; Glenn Firebaugh
Journal:  Soc Sci Res       Date:  2009-03

3.  It's "the Joneses": the influence of objective and subjective socioeconomic status on subjective perceptions of aging.

Authors:  Alaina N English; Jennifer A Bellingtier; Shevaun D Neupert
Journal:  Eur J Ageing       Date:  2018-05-12

4.  Black-white differences in happiness, 1972-2014.

Authors:  John Iceland; Sarah Ludwig-Dehm
Journal:  Soc Sci Res       Date:  2018-10-06

5.  Exploring geographic variation in US mortality rates using a spatial Durbin approach.

Authors:  Tse-Chuan Yang; Aggie Noah; Carla Shoff
Journal:  Popul Space Place       Date:  2015-01

6.  Adolescents' relative position in school and educational attainment: The mediating role of educational expectations.

Authors:  Kiwoong Park
Journal:  Soc Sci Res       Date:  2020-12-24

7.  Still Large, but Narrowing: The Sizable Decline in Racial Neighborhood Inequality in Metropolitan America, 1980-2010.

Authors:  Glenn Firebaugh; Chad R Farrell
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2016-02

8.  Income Inequality, Neighbourhood Social Capital and Subjective Well-Being in China: Exploration of a Moderating Effect.

Authors:  Jiawen Huang; Yitong Fang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Area-Level Variation and Human Papillomavirus Vaccination among Adolescents and Young Adults in the United States: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Elizabeth K Do; Brianna Rossi; Carrie A Miller; Albert J Ksinan; David C Wheeler; Askar Chukmaitov; John W Cyrus; Bernard F Fuemmeler
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2020-10-02       Impact factor: 4.090

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.