BACKGROUND: Both greater body size and higher mammographic density seem to be associated with a risk of breast cancer. To understand a mechanism through which body size confers a higher risk of breast cancer, associations between mammographic measures and various measures of body size were examined. METHOD: Study subjects were 730 Korean women selected from the Healthy Twin study. Body size measurements were completed according to standard protocol. Mammographic density was measured from digital mammograms using a computer-assisted method from which the total area and the dense area of the breast were calculated, and nondense area and percent of dense area were straightforwardly derived. Linear mixed models considering familial correlations were used for analyses. RESULTS: Total and nondense areas were positively associated with current body mass index (BMI), BMI at 35 years, total fat percent, waist circumference, and waist-hip ratio, whereas percent dense area was inversely associated with these characteristics in both premenopausal and postmenopausal women. Height was not associated with any mammographic measure. Total and nondense areas had strong positive genetic correlations with current BMI, total fat percent, waist circumference, and waist-hip ratio, whereas percent dense area had strong inverse genetic correlations with these body size measurements. CONCLUSION: Mammographic density and obesity are inversely associated with each other possibly from common genetic influences that have opposite effects on mammographic density and obesity in Korean women. IMPACT: The association between obesity and breast cancer does not seem to be mediated through mammographic density. Copyright 2010 AACR.
BACKGROUND: Both greater body size and higher mammographic density seem to be associated with a risk of breast cancer. To understand a mechanism through which body size confers a higher risk of breast cancer, associations between mammographic measures and various measures of body size were examined. METHOD: Study subjects were 730 Korean women selected from the Healthy Twin study. Body size measurements were completed according to standard protocol. Mammographic density was measured from digital mammograms using a computer-assisted method from which the total area and the dense area of the breast were calculated, and nondense area and percent of dense area were straightforwardly derived. Linear mixed models considering familial correlations were used for analyses. RESULTS: Total and nondense areas were positively associated with current body mass index (BMI), BMI at 35 years, total fat percent, waist circumference, and waist-hip ratio, whereas percent dense area was inversely associated with these characteristics in both premenopausal and postmenopausal women. Height was not associated with any mammographic measure. Total and nondense areas had strong positive genetic correlations with current BMI, total fat percent, waist circumference, and waist-hip ratio, whereas percent dense area had strong inverse genetic correlations with these body size measurements. CONCLUSION: Mammographic density and obesity are inversely associated with each other possibly from common genetic influences that have opposite effects on mammographic density and obesity in Korean women. IMPACT: The association between obesity and breast cancer does not seem to be mediated through mammographic density. Copyright 2010 AACR.
Authors: Hilda Razzaghi; Melissa A Troester; Gretchen L Gierach; Andrew F Olshan; Bonnie C Yankaskas; Robert C Millikan Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2012-08-03 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Joanne F Dorgan; Catherine Klifa; John A Shepherd; Brian L Egleston; Peter O Kwiterovich; John H Himes; Kelley Gabriel; Linda Horn; Linda G Snetselaar; Victor J Stevens; Bruce A Barton; Alan M Robson; Norman L Lasser; Snehal Deshmukh; Nola M Hylton Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2012-07-13 Impact factor: 6.466
Authors: Marina Pollán; Virginia Lope; Josefa Miranda-García; Milagros García; Francisco Casanova; Carmen Sánchez-Contador; Carmen Santamariña; Pilar Moreo; Carmen Vidal; Mercé Peris; María Pilar Moreno; José Antonio Vázquez-Carrete; Francisca Collado; Carmen Pedraz-Pingarrón; Nieves Ascunce; Dolores Salas-Trejo; Nuria Aragonés; Beatriz Pérez-Gómez; Francisco Ruiz-Perales Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2012-06-12 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Johanna Olga Pauline Wanders; Marije Fokje Bakker; Wouter Bernard Veldhuis; Petra Huberdina Maria Peeters; Carla Henrica van Gils Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2015-05-30 Impact factor: 6.466
Authors: Hyuna Sung; Jiansong Ren; Jing Li; Min Dai; Xiaohong R Yang; Jie He; Ruth M Pfeiffer; Yong Wang; Jennifer L Guida; Yi Fang; Jufang Shi; Kai Zhang; Ni Li; Shen Wang; Luopei Wei; Nan Hu; Gretchen L Gierach Journal: NPJ Breast Cancer Date: 2018-02-06
Authors: Minouk J Schoemaker; Michael E Jones; Steven Allen; Jean Hoare; Alan Ashworth; Mitch Dowsett; Anthony J Swerdlow Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2017-02-07 Impact factor: 6.466
Authors: Megan S Rice; Kimberly A Bertrand; Martin Lajous; Rulla M Tamimi; Gabriela Torres-Mejía; Carine Biessy; Ruy López-Ridaura; Isabelle Romieu Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2013-03-05 Impact factor: 4.624
Authors: Andrea Markkula; Maria Simonsson; Ann H Rosendahl; Alexander Gaber; Christian Ingvar; Carsten Rose; Helena Jernström Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2014-03-20 Impact factor: 7.396