PURPOSE: To investigate in vivo severity and topographic distribution of brain white matter (WM) fiber bundle atrophy in patients with Friedreich ataxia, a condition characterized by an uneven involvement of brain WM, and to correlate such findings with the clinical status of the patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was conducted with institutional review board approval. Written informed consent was obtained from each participant. Sixteen patients with Friedreich ataxia and 15 healthy control subjects were studied by using a 1.5-T magnetic resonance (MR) imager and 3-mm-thick diffusion-tensor images with 15 noncollinear directions. The size of WM fiber bundles was examined at a voxel level by using a recently developed method, which relies on production of anisotropy maps and nonlinear registration. Data were analyzed by using statistical parametric mapping software and an analysis of covariance model adjusted for age and sex. RESULTS: Compared with control subjects, patients with Friedreich ataxia had WM atrophy in (a) the central portion of the medulla oblongata, (b) the dorsal upper pons, (c) the superior cerebellar peduncles, (d) the central portion of the midbrain, (e) the medial portion of the right cerebral peduncle, (f) the peridentate region, bilaterally, and (g) the optic chiasm. The severity of the neurologic deficits correlated significantly with atrophy of the peridentate WM, bilaterally, and that of the superior cerebellar peduncle decussation. CONCLUSION: Findings of this study show that it is feasible to obtain in vivo atrophy estimates of specific brain WM fiber bundles in patients with Friedreich ataxia and that such estimates correlate with patients' clinical status. This approach has the potential to provide new information that is likely to improve the understanding of the pathophysiology of inherited ataxias. Copyright RSNA, 2010
PURPOSE: To investigate in vivo severity and topographic distribution of brain white matter (WM) fiber bundle atrophy in patients with Friedreich ataxia, a condition characterized by an uneven involvement of brain WM, and to correlate such findings with the clinical status of the patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was conducted with institutional review board approval. Written informed consent was obtained from each participant. Sixteen patients with Friedreich ataxia and 15 healthy control subjects were studied by using a 1.5-T magnetic resonance (MR) imager and 3-mm-thick diffusion-tensor images with 15 noncollinear directions. The size of WM fiber bundles was examined at a voxel level by using a recently developed method, which relies on production of anisotropy maps and nonlinear registration. Data were analyzed by using statistical parametric mapping software and an analysis of covariance model adjusted for age and sex. RESULTS: Compared with control subjects, patients with Friedreich ataxia had WM atrophy in (a) the central portion of the medulla oblongata, (b) the dorsal upper pons, (c) the superior cerebellar peduncles, (d) the central portion of the midbrain, (e) the medial portion of the right cerebral peduncle, (f) the peridentate region, bilaterally, and (g) the optic chiasm. The severity of the neurologic deficits correlated significantly with atrophy of the peridentate WM, bilaterally, and that of the superior cerebellar peduncle decussation. CONCLUSION: Findings of this study show that it is feasible to obtain in vivo atrophy estimates of specific brain WM fiber bundles in patients with Friedreich ataxia and that such estimates correlate with patients' clinical status. This approach has the potential to provide new information that is likely to improve the understanding of the pathophysiology of inherited ataxias. Copyright RSNA, 2010
Authors: Karl Egger; Christian Clemm von Hohenberg; Michael F Schocke; Charles R G Guttmann; Demian Wassermann; Marlene C Wigand; Wolfgang Nachbauer; Christian Kremser; Brigitte Sturm; Barbara Scheiber-Mojdehkar; Marek Kubicki; Martha E Shenton; Sylvia Boesch Journal: J Neuroimaging Date: 2013-09-09 Impact factor: 2.486
Authors: Andrea Ginestroni; Stefano Diciotti; Paolo Cecchi; Ilaria Pesaresi; Carlo Tessa; Marco Giannelli; Riccardo Della Nave; Elena Salvatore; Fabrizio Salvi; Maria Teresa Dotti; Silvia Piacentini; Andrea Soricelli; Mirco Cosottini; Nicola De Stefano; Mario Mascalchi Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2011-06-14 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Leonardo Baldarçara; Stuart Currie; M Hadjivassiliou; Nigel Hoggard; Allison Jack; Andrea P Jackowski; Mario Mascalchi; Cecilia Parazzini; Kathrin Reetz; Andrea Righini; Jörg B Schulz; Alessandra Vella; Sara Jane Webb; Christophe Habas Journal: Cerebellum Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 3.847
Authors: Mario Mascalchi; Andrea Bianchi; Stefano Ciulli; Andrea Ginestroni; Marco Aiello; Maria Teresa Dotti; Fabrizio Salvi; Emanuele Nicolai; Andrea Soricelli; Stefano Diciotti Journal: J Neurol Date: 2017-06-15 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Riccardo Della Nave; Andrea Ginestroni; Stefano Diciotti; Elena Salvatore; Andrea Soricelli; Mario Mascalchi Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2010-12-03 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: K K Oguz; G Haliloglu; C Temucin; R Gocmen; A C Has; K Doerschner; A Dolgun; M Alikasifoglu Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2013-04-18 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: A Blaschek; D Keeser; S Müller; I K Koerte; A Sebastian Schröder; W Müller-Felber; F Heinen; B Ertl-Wagner Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2013-05-16 Impact factor: 3.825