Literature DB >> 20501718

Diagnostic performance of 64-channel multidetector CT in the evaluation of gastric cancer: differentiation of mucosal cancer (T1a) from submucosal involvement (T1b and T2).

In Joon Lee1, Jeong Min Lee, Seung Ho Kim, Cheong-Ii Shin, Jae Young Lee, Se Hyung Kim, Joon Koo Han, Byung Ihn Choi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To identify the computed tomographic (CT) findings in T1a and T1b cancers and to evaluate the diagnostic performance of multidetector CT with two-dimensional multiplanar reconstruction and three-dimensional CT gastrography for evaluating the preoperative staging of gastric cancer, with special emphasis on the differentiation between T1a and T1b cancers.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The institutional review board approved this retrospective study. A total of 148 patients with gastric cancer (64 T1a, 36 T1b, and 48 T2) were included. To identify CT findings in T1a and T1b cancers, two radiologists in consensus interpreted the preoperative CT images of the 100 T1 cancers to determine the morphologic characteristics to be used as staging criteria on CT images. By using univariate and multiple logistic regression analyses, the diagnostic criteria to identify T1a and T1b cancers were developed. To evaluate the diagnostic performance of multidetector CT by using the criteria, two other blinded reviewers independently analyzed the CT images of all 148 patients to assess the T (classifying the depth of invasion as T1a, T1b, or T2) and N (classifying nodal involvement as absent or present) stage. CT staging was correlated with histopathologic results. Interobserver agreement was assessed by using weighted kappa statistics.
RESULTS: The detectability of T1b cancer was significantly higher than that of T1a cancer (P = .003). T1b cancer showed well-enhancing mucosal thickening more frequently than did T1a cancer (P = .002). By using the modified CT criteria, the overall accuracy values of T staging and N staging were 64.9% (96/148) and 79.1% (117/148) for reviewer 1 and 63.5% (94/148) and 83.8% (124/148) for reviewer 2, respectively. Weighted kappa values of T and N staging were 0.795 and 0.641, respectively.
CONCLUSION: On multidetector CT images, T1a cancer shows different imaging features than does T1b cancer regarding enhancing characteristics and detectability. Multidetector CT provides relatively valuable results of T and N staging, including differentiation between T1a, T1b, and T2 gastric cancers. Copyright RSNA, 2010

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20501718     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.10091313

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  24 in total

1.  Pre-operative lymph node status of gastric cancer evaluated by multidetector computed tomography.

Authors:  Min Wang; Yanwei Ye; Qing Yang; Jingjing Li; Chao Han; Wei Wang; Chunlin Zhao; Jianguo Wen
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-10-15

2.  The classification of anatomic variations in the perigastric vessels by dual-phase CT to reduce intraoperative bleeding during laparoscopic gastrectomy.

Authors:  Toshiyuki Natsume; Kiyohiko Shuto; Noriyuki Yanagawa; Takashi Akai; Hiroshi Kawahira; Hideki Hayashi; Hisahiro Matsubara
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Diagnostic performance of 64-section CT using CT gastrography in preoperative T staging of gastric cancer according to 7th edition of AJCC cancer staging manual.

Authors:  Jin Woong Kim; Sang Soo Shin; Suk Hee Heo; Yoo Duk Choi; Hyo Soon Lim; Young Kyu Park; Chang Hwan Park; Yong Yeon Jeong; Heoung Keun Kang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  State-of-the-art preoperative staging of gastric cancer by MDCT and magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Joon-Il Choi; Ijin Joo; Jeong Min Lee
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  The role of three-dimensional multidetector CT gastrography in the preoperative imaging of stomach cancer: emphasis on detection and localization of the tumor.

Authors:  Jin Woong Kim; Sang Soo Shin; Suk Hee Heo; Hyo Soon Lim; Nam Yeol Lim; Young Kyu Park; Yong Yeon Jeong; Heoung Keun Kang
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 3.500

6.  MDCT features in the differentiation of T4a gastric cancer from less-advanced gastric cancer: significance of the hyperattenuating serosa sign.

Authors:  T U Kim; S Kim; J W Lee; N K Lee; T Y Jeon; D Y Park
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Consensus statement of the Hellenic and Cypriot Gastric Cancer Study Group on the diagnosis, staging and management of gastric cancer.

Authors:  Gerasimos N Douridas; Andreas Fountoulakis; John Souglakos; Sofia Gourtsoyianni; Louiza Vini; Georgia Levidou; Theodoros Liakakos; Christos Agalianos; Christos Dervenis; Maria Angeliki Kalogeridi; Ioannis Karavokyros; Anna Koumarianou; Panteleimon Kountourakis; Georgios Oikonomopoulos; Panagiota Economopoulou; Joseph Sgouros; Spiros N Sgouros; Konstantinos Stamou; Charikleia Triantopoulou; Dimitrios Zacharoulis; Nikolaos Gouvas; Evangelos Xynos
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2020-02-28

8.  MDCT in the preoperative staging of gastric adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Daniella Braz Parente
Journal:  Radiol Bras       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr

9.  Current status and future perspectives on neoadjuvant therapy in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Sheng Ao; Yuchen Wang; Qingzhi Song; Yingjiang Ye; Guoqing Lyu
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 5.087

Review 10.  The current and possible future role of 3D modelling within oesophagogastric surgery: a scoping review.

Authors:  Henry Robb; Gemma Scrimgeour; Piers Boshier; Anna Przedlacka; Svetlana Balyasnikova; Gina Brown; Fernando Bello; Christos Kontovounisios
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 3.453

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.