Literature DB >> 20500759

The future of bioethics: three dogmas and a cup of hemlock.

Angus Dawson1.   

Abstract

In this paper I argue that bioethics is in crisis and that it will not have a future unless it begins to embrace a more Socratic approach to its leading assumptions. The absence of a critical and sceptical spirit has resulted in little more than a dominant ideology. I focus on three key issues. First, that too often bioethics collapses into medical ethics. Second, that medical ethics itself is beset by a lack of self-reflection that I characterize here as a commitment to three dogmas. Third, I offer a more positive perspective by suggesting how bioethics may benefit from looking towards public health ethics as a new source of inspiration and direction.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20500759     DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2010.01814.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioethics        ISSN: 0269-9702            Impact factor:   1.898


  15 in total

1.  Addressing Deficits and Injustices: The Potential Epistemic Contributions of Patients to Research.

Authors:  Katrina Hutchison; Wendy Rogers; Vikki A Entwistle
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2017-12

2.  Information, choice and the ends of health promotion.

Authors:  Angus Dawson
Journal:  Monash Bioeth Rev       Date:  2014 Mar-Jun

3.  The political and ethical challenge of multi-drug resistant tuberculosis.

Authors:  Chris Degeling; Christopher Mayes; Wendy Lipworth; Ian Kerridge; Ross Upshur
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 1.352

4.  Bioethics and the Myth of Neutrality.

Authors:  Angus Dawson; Christopher F C Jordens; Paul Macneill; Deborah Zion
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.352

5.  The troubled identity of the bioethicist.

Authors:  Nicky Priaulx
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2013-03

6.  How do 'Public' Values Influence Individual Health Behaviour? An Empirical-Normative Analysis of Young Men's Discourse Regarding HIV Testing Practices.

Authors:  Rod Knight; Will Small; Jean Shoveller
Journal:  Public Health Ethics       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 1.940

7.  Vorsprung durch Technik: On biotechnology, bioethics, and its beneficiaries.

Authors:  Nicky Priaulx
Journal:  Camb Q Healthc Ethics       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.284

8.  Cancer clinical trial participants' assessment of risk and benefit.

Authors:  Connie M Ulrich; Sarah J Ratcliffe; Gwenyth R Wallen; Qiuping Pearl Zhou; Kathleen Knafl; Christine Grady
Journal:  AJOB Empir Bioeth       Date:  2015-05-01

Review 9.  The promise of public health ethics for precision medicine: the case of newborn preventive genomic sequencing.

Authors:  Ainsley J Newson
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2021-03-14       Impact factor: 4.132

10.  We're not in it for the money-lay people's moral intuitions on commercial use of 'their' biobank.

Authors:  Kristin Solum Steinsbekk; Lars Oystein Ursin; John-Arne Skolbekken; Berge Solberg
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2013-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.