Literature DB >> 2050070

The potential of exposure biomarkers in epidemiologic studies of reproductive health.

C J Hogue1, M A Brewster.   

Abstract

To further the development and application of exposure markers in field investigations in reproductive epidemiology, we have synthesized recent examinations of the issues surrounding exposure measurements in reproductive epidemiology. The specific goals of this paper are to define exposure biomarkers and explore their potential uses, particularly as screening tools. The tests for glucaric acid, thioethers, mutagenicity, and porphyrin patterns meet the general criteria for useful exposure screens. For certain xenobiotic agents, these tests accurately differentiate exposure levels, as demonstrated in occupational and environmental epidemiologic studies. As urinary screens, they are noninvasive and applicable on a large scale with current laboratory techniques. For short-term exposure, glucaric acid, thioethers, and mutagenicity tests are useful. Porphyrin patterns may measure cumulative effects as well as current exposure levels. The usefulness of these tests in epidemiologic studies of environmental effects on reproductive health has yet to be studied. To do so, the battery must be standardized for pregnant women, and test results must be correlated with measured adverse reproductive outcomes, such as gestational length and birthweight. This correlation is particularly important because maternal exposure rather than fetal exposure is being measured. The extent to which xenobiotic chemicals cross the placental barrier may vary greatly depending on the type of exposures, timing in pregnancy, and maternal detoxification capability. Without better exposure measures, epidemiologic studies of reproductive health probably will not successfully identify xenobiotic fetotoxic agents in the environment. However, with an adequate battery of nonspecific exposure biomarkers, prospective studies of environmental effects on pregnancy outcomes might be possible.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2050070      PMCID: PMC1519493          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.90-1519493

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  94 in total

1.  Studies of the influence of chloro-substituent sites and conformational energy in polychlorinated biphenyls on uroporphyrin formation in chick-embryo liver cell cultures.

Authors:  S Sassa; O Sugita; N Ohnuma; S Imajo; T Okumura; T Noguchi; A Kappas
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1986-04-01       Impact factor: 3.857

Review 2.  Biomarkers of xenobiotic exposures.

Authors:  M A Brewster
Journal:  Ann Clin Lab Sci       Date:  1988 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.256

3.  Increased hepatic microsomal enzyme activity from occupational exposure to certain organochlorine pesticides.

Authors:  J Hunter; J D Maxwell; D A Stewart; R Williams; J Robinson; A Richardson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1972-06-16       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Developmental effects on liver D-glucuronolactone dehydrogenase levels and on D-glucaric acid excretion in urine; hormonal effects on D-glucaric acid excretion in urine.

Authors:  A P Mowat
Journal:  J Endocrinol       Date:  1968-12       Impact factor: 4.286

5.  The influence of n-hexane treatment on the glucuronic acid pathway and activity of some drug-metabolizing enzymes in guinea-pig.

Authors:  W R Notten; P T Henderson
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  1975-01-01       Impact factor: 5.858

6.  Dose-dependent metabolism of trichloroethylene and its relevance to hepatotoxicity in rats.

Authors:  L Rouisse; S K Chakrabarti
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 6.498

7.  Biological effects in a chemical factory with mutagenic exposure. III. Urinary mutagenicity and thioether excretion.

Authors:  L Hagmar; T Bellander; L Persson; A Holmén; R Attewell; B Högstedt; S Skerfving
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.015

8.  Biological monitoring of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Metabolites in urine.

Authors:  F J Jongeneelen; R P Bos; R B Anzion; J L Theuws; P T Henderson
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 5.024

9.  Glutathione conjugation and bacterial mutagenicity of racemic and enantiomerically pure cis- and trans-methyl epoxycinnamates.

Authors:  E C Rietveld; F J van Gastel; F Seutter-Berlage; B Zwanenburg
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 5.153

10.  Using reproductive effect markers to observe subclinical events, reduce misclassification, and explore mechanism.

Authors:  M C Hatch; G Friedman-Jimenez
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Evaluation of health risks for contaminated aquifers.

Authors:  W T Piver; T L Jacobs; M A Medina
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 9.031

2.  Biomarker measurements in a coastal fish-eating population environmentally exposed to organochlorines.

Authors:  Pierre Ayotte; Eric Dewailly; George H Lambert; Sherry L Perkins; Raymond Poon; Mark Feeley; Christian Larochelle; Daria Pereg
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 3.  Application of biologic markers to studies of environmental risks in children and the developing fetus.

Authors:  R M Whyatt; F P Perera
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 9.031

4.  Biological monitoring of workers exposed to N-nitrosodiethanolamine in the metal industry.

Authors:  S Monarca; G Scassellati-Sforzolini; F Donato; G Angeli; B Spiegelhalder; C Fatigoni; R Pasquini
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 9.031

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.