Literature DB >> 2050065

Statistical issues in carcinogenic risk assessment.

H E Rockette1.   

Abstract

Considerable progress has been made on the development of a variety of analytical methods to aid in the carcinogenic risk associated with exposure to both occupational and environmental agents. Although the development of these methods has been accompanied by consideration of many statistical issues, there are many areas where additional effort could be directed if these analytical methods are to provide the most appropriate interpretation of risk. These issues include methods of combining multiple studies to obtain an overall risk estimate, the robustness of the statistical model, methods of selection among competing models, an assessment of the effect of different measures of exposure on the estimated dose-response relationship, and development of surveillance methodology. These issues are discussed, and productive areas of future research are indicated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2050065      PMCID: PMC1519477          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.90-1519477

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  29 in total

Review 1.  Does aluminum smelting cause lung disease?

Authors:  M J Abramson; J H Wlodarczyk; N A Saunders; M J Hensley
Journal:  Am Rev Respir Dis       Date:  1989-04

Review 2.  Meta-analysis in medicine. Where we are and where we want to go.

Authors:  M Jenicek
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 3.  Quantitative theories of oncogenesis.

Authors:  A S Whittemore
Journal:  Adv Cancer Res       Date:  1978       Impact factor: 6.242

4.  Adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. A pooled estimate based on published randomized control trials.

Authors:  H N Himel; A Liberati; R D Gelber; T C Chalmers
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1986-09-05       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 5.  Power considerations in epidemiologic studies of vinyl chloride workers.

Authors:  J J Beaumont; N E Breslow
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1981-11       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Two-stage model for carcinogenesis: Epidemiology of breast cancer in females.

Authors:  S H Moolgavkar; N E Day; R G Stevens
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  A method of analysis of a certain class of experiments in carcinogenesis.

Authors:  M C Pike
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1966-03       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Mortality studies of aluminum reduction plant workers: potroom and carbon department.

Authors:  H E Rockette; V C Arena
Journal:  J Occup Med       Date:  1983-07

9.  Multistage models and primary prevention of cancer.

Authors:  N E Day; C C Brown
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1980-04       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 10.  Multistage models of carcinogenesis.

Authors:  P Armitage
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  1 in total

1.  Trends in quantitative cancer risk assessment.

Authors:  S C Morris
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 9.031

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.