Literature DB >> 2050049

Critical effective methods to detect genotoxic carcinogens and neoplasm-promoting agents.

J H Weisburger1, G M Williams.   

Abstract

Neoplasia in fish can result from contamination of waters with carcinogens and promoters. Cancer in fish, therefore, is a possible indicator of cancer risk to man and serves as a guide to the need for preventive approaches involving improved means of waste disposal and environmental hygiene. Moreover, cancer in fish indicates that this important food source may be contaminated. Detection of genotoxic carcinogens to which fish are exposed can be achieved quickly and efficiently by carefully selected batteries of complementary in vitro and in vivo bioassays. One such battery consists of the Ames test, a reverse mutation assay in prokaryotic Salmonella typhimurium, and the Williams test, involving DNA repair in freshly explanted metabolically highly competent liver cells from diverse species, including humans. Determination of DNA-carcinogen adducts by varied techniques, including 32P-postlabeling, as well as DNA breakage, mammalian cell mutagenicity, chromosome aberrations, sister chromatid exchange, or cell transformation represent additional approaches, each with its own advantages and disadvantages. More research is needed on systems to apprehend neoplasm promoters, but tests to determine interruption of intercellular communications through gap junctions appear promising. Other approaches rely on measurement of enzymes such as ornithine decarboxylase and protein kinase C. Approaches to the definition of risk to fish or humans require characterization of the genotoxic or nongenotoxic properties of a chemical, relative potency data obtained in select, limited rodent bioassays, and knowledge of prevailing environmental concentrations of specific carcinogens.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2050049      PMCID: PMC1519472          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.90-1519472

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  34 in total

Review 1.  Phylogeny and oncogeny.

Authors:  C J Dawe
Journal:  Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  1969-07

Review 2.  Mutagenic effects of organic compounds in drinking water.

Authors:  J C Loper
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 2.433

3.  Reliability of the hepatocyte primary culture/DNA repair test in testing of coded carcinogens and noncarcinogens.

Authors:  G M Williams; M F Laspia; V C Dunkel
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 2.433

4.  Drinking water and cancer: review of recent epidemiological findings and assessment of risks.

Authors:  K S Crump; H A Guess
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 21.981

5.  Polybrominated biphenyl (PBB) contamination of the Pine River, Gratiot, and Midland Counties, Michigan.

Authors:  J L Hesse; R A Powers
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1978-04       Impact factor: 9.031

6.  Field concentrations and persistence of polybrominated biphenyls in soils and solubility of PBB in natural waters.

Authors:  L W Jacobs; S F Chou; J M Tiedje
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1978-04       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 7.  The causes of cancer: quantitative estimates of avoidable risks of cancer in the United States today.

Authors:  R Doll; R Peto
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Mutagenicity of municipal water obtained from an agricultural area.

Authors:  M W Heartlein; D M DeMarini; A J Katz; J C Means; M J Plewa; H E Brockman
Journal:  Environ Mutagen       Date:  1981

Review 9.  Carcinogenesis studies in rodents for evaluating risks associated with chemical carcinogens in aquatic food animals.

Authors:  J Huff; J Bucher; R Yang
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Mutagenic activity associated with by-products of drinking water disinfection by chlorine, chlorine dioxide, ozone and UV-irradiation.

Authors:  B C Zoeteman; J Hrubec; E de Greef; H J Kool
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.