Hyun Kyung Kim1, Mi Ja Kim, Chang Gi Park, Hyeon Ok Kim. 1. College of Nursing, Chonbuk Research Institute of Nursing Science, Chonbuk National University, Jeonju, South Korea. kimhk@jbnu.ac.uk
Abstract
AIM: This study aimed to examine gender differences in physical activity and its determinants among rural adults in Korea. BACKGROUND: Only limited studies exist that examined gender differences in physical activity in Korean adults. Major determinants for physical activity such as self-efficacy, benefits and barriers have been studied, but little is known about their gender differences. Nurses promoting and teaching adults to increase physical activity need data for evidence-based practice. DESIGN: A cross-sectional descriptive design was used. METHOD: Participants were 481 adults living in a rural area of Korea. The physical activity status, exercise self-efficacy, benefits, barriers and sociodemographics were compared between men and women. Descriptive statistics, t-test and binary logistic regression were used for data analysis. RESULTS: The physical activity status, perceived self-efficacy and benefits of physical activity in women were significantly lower than those of men. For men, only self-efficacy was statistically significant in explaining recommended physical activity as well as physical activity participation. However, for women, benefits and barriers as well as self-efficacy significantly explained their participation of physical activity, but not the recommended physical activity. Unlike men, women's physical activity was significantly associated with sociodemographic factors. CONCLUSION: Gender differences found in this study should be the basis for evidence-based nursing practice. Tailored nursing interventions based on gender would improve physical activity of rural adults in Korea and beyond. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Nurses providing care for rural adults should know the gender differences in the determinants of physical activity and provide gender-specific interventions to improve their physical activity.
AIM: This study aimed to examine gender differences in physical activity and its determinants among rural adults in Korea. BACKGROUND: Only limited studies exist that examined gender differences in physical activity in Korean adults. Major determinants for physical activity such as self-efficacy, benefits and barriers have been studied, but little is known about their gender differences. Nurses promoting and teaching adults to increase physical activity need data for evidence-based practice. DESIGN: A cross-sectional descriptive design was used. METHOD:Participants were 481 adults living in a rural area of Korea. The physical activity status, exercise self-efficacy, benefits, barriers and sociodemographics were compared between men and women. Descriptive statistics, t-test and binary logistic regression were used for data analysis. RESULTS: The physical activity status, perceived self-efficacy and benefits of physical activity in women were significantly lower than those of men. For men, only self-efficacy was statistically significant in explaining recommended physical activity as well as physical activity participation. However, for women, benefits and barriers as well as self-efficacy significantly explained their participation of physical activity, but not the recommended physical activity. Unlike men, women's physical activity was significantly associated with sociodemographic factors. CONCLUSION: Gender differences found in this study should be the basis for evidence-based nursing practice. Tailored nursing interventions based on gender would improve physical activity of rural adults in Korea and beyond. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Nurses providing care for rural adults should know the gender differences in the determinants of physical activity and provide gender-specific interventions to improve their physical activity.
Authors: Gustavo G Zarini; Joan A Vaccaro; Maria A Canossa Terris; Joel C Exebio; Laura Tokayer; Janet Antwi; Sahar Ajabshir; Amanpreet Cheema; Fatma G Huffman Journal: J Environ Public Health Date: 2014-10-28
Authors: Yanni Verhavert; Kristine De Martelaer; Elke Van Hoof; Eline Van Der Linden; Evert Zinzen; Tom Deliens Journal: Nutrients Date: 2020-02-02 Impact factor: 5.717