Literature DB >> 20499367

Independent clinical validation of a Canadian FRAX tool: fracture prediction and model calibration.

William D Leslie1, Lisa M Lix, Helena Johansson, Anders Oden, Eugene McCloskey, John A Kanis.   

Abstract

A FRAX model for Canada was constructed for prediction of osteoporotic and hip fracture risk using national hip fracture data with and without the use of femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD). Performance of this system was assessed independently in a large clinical cohort of 36,730 women and 2873 men from the Manitoba Bone Density Program database that tracks all clinical dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) test results for the Province of Manitoba, Canada. Linkage with other provincial health databases allowed for the direct comparison of fracture risk estimates from the Canadian FRAX model with observed fracture rates to 10 years (549 individuals with incident hip fractures and 2543 with incident osteoporotic fractures). The 10-year Kaplan-Meier estimate for hip fractures in women was 2.7% [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.1-3.4%] with a predicted value of 2.8% for FRAX with BMD, and in men the observed risk was 3.5% (95% CI 0.8-6.2%) with predicted value of 2.9%. The 10-year estimate of osteoporotic fracture risk for all women was 12.0% (95% CI 10.8-13.4%) with a predicted value of 11.1% for FRAX with BMD, and in men, the observed risk was 10.7% (95% CI 6.6-14.9%) with a predicted value of 8.4%. Discrepancies were observed within some subgroups but generally were small. Fracture discrimination based on receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was comparable with published meta-analyses with area under the curve for osteoporotic fracture prediction of 0.694 (95% CI 0.684-0.705) for FRAX with BMD and for hip fractures 0.830 (95% CI 0.815-0.846), both of which were better than FRAX without BMD or BMD alone. Individual risk factors considered by FRAX made significant independent contributions to fracture prediction in one or more of the models. In conclusion, a Canadian FRAX tool calibrated on national hip fracture data generates fracture risk predictions that generally are consistent with observed fracture rates across a wide range of risk categories.
© 2010 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20499367     DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.123

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  95 in total

1.  Fracture-risk calculators: Has their time come?

Authors:  Mark J Bolland
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2010-12-20       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  2010 clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in Canada: summary.

Authors:  Alexandra Papaioannou; Suzanne Morin; Angela M Cheung; Stephanie Atkinson; Jacques P Brown; Sidney Feldman; David A Hanley; Anthony Hodsman; Sophie A Jamal; Stephanie M Kaiser; Brent Kvern; Kerry Siminoski; William D Leslie
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  New osteoporosis guidelines for Canada.

Authors:  John A Kanis
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 4.  Assessment of fracture risk.

Authors:  Sanford Baim; William D Leslie
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 5.096

5.  A comparative study of using non-hip bone density inputs with FRAX®.

Authors:  W D Leslie; L M Lix; H Johansson; A Oden; E McCloskey; J A Kanis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Comment on Kanis et al.: Pitfalls in the external validation of FRAX.

Authors:  M J Bolland; A Grey; G Gamble; I R Reid
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Is lower income associated with an increased likelihood of qualification for treatment for osteoporosis in Canadian women?

Authors:  S L Brennan; W D Leslie; L M Lix
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Does diabetes modify the effect of FRAX risk factors for predicting major osteoporotic and hip fracture?

Authors:  W D Leslie; S N Morin; L M Lix; S R Majumdar
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Risk-equivalent T-score adjustment for using lumbar spine trabecular bone score (TBS): the Manitoba BMD registry.

Authors:  W D Leslie; E Shevroja; H Johansson; E V McCloskey; N C Harvey; J A Kanis; D Hans
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Fracture prediction from self-reported falls in routine clinical practice: a registry-based cohort study.

Authors:  W D Leslie; S N Morin; L M Lix; P Martineau; M Bryanton; E V McCloskey; H Johansson; N C Harvey; J A Kanis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.