Literature DB >> 20499190

Cancer risk assessment after exposure from natural radionuclides in soil using Monte Carlo techniques.

Ljubica Zupunski1, Vesna Spasić-Jokić, Mirjana Trobok, Vojin Gordanić.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this paper is to assess fatal cancer risk after external and internal (inhalation and ingestion) exposure from natural radionuclides in soil like (238)U, (232)Th, (40)K, and (226)Ra on the territory of Bela Crkva, Serbia. Although receiving doses are low from sources like natural radionuclides in soil, because of stochastic effects of ionizing radiation, risk for developing cancer exists and can be quantified.
METHODS: Concentrations of radionuclides from 80 soil samples are measured using HPGe detector. Fatal cancer risk is assessed from calculated ambient dose rate in the target organs of body due to external and internal exposure. Monte Carlo simulations are used to obtain conversion factors which are required to calculate absorbed dose rate in target organs. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Assessed cancer risk for (238)U in the case of both inhalation and ingestion exposure is from 1.11 × 10(-6) to 24 × 10(-6) for minimal and maximal activity in soil samples, from 1.02 × 10(-6) to 23.3 × 10(-6) for exposure to (226)Ra, from 1.89 × 10(-6) to 50.3 × 10(-6) for exposure to (232)Th, and from 0.265 × 10(-6) to 9.83 × 10(-6) for exposure to (40)K. Overall risk from (40)K as external and internal source is from 0.8 × 10(-6) to 31.9 × 10(-6). Calculated cancer risks from both inhalation and ingestion exposure could be related to all tissues that are on the way of distribution of particles within the body but especially to deposition sites in the body.
CONCLUSION: Assessed risks for fatal cancer development from inhaled and ingested natural radionuclides originating in soil are not increased.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20499190     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-010-0344-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  13 in total

1.  The LNT model provides the best approach for practical implementation of radiation protection.

Authors:  C J Martin
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Classification of soil samples according to their geographic origin using gamma-ray spectrometry and principal component analysis.

Authors:  Snezana Dragović; Antonije Onjia
Journal:  J Environ Radioact       Date:  2006-06-21       Impact factor: 2.674

Review 3.  New developments in exposure assessment: the impact on the practice of health risk assessment and epidemiological studies.

Authors:  Mark Nieuwenhuijsen; Dennis Paustenbach; Raquel Duarte-Davidson
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2006-07-26       Impact factor: 9.621

4.  U and Th in some brown coals of Serbia and Montenegro and their environmental impact.

Authors:  Dragana Zivotić; Ivan Grzetić; Hans Lorenz; Vladimir Simić
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Calculation of effective dose-equivalent responses for external exposure from residual photon emitters in soil.

Authors:  S Y Chen
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 1.316

6.  Dose-rate conversion factors for external exposure to photon emitters in soil.

Authors:  D C Kocher; A L Sjoreen
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 1.316

7.  Age-dependent doses to members of the public from intake of radionuclides: Part 3. Ingestion dose coefficients. A report of a Task Group of Committee 2 of the International Commission on Radiological Protection.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann ICRP       Date:  1995

8.  Estimating radiation-induced cancer risks at very low doses: rationale for using a linear no-threshold approach.

Authors:  David J Brenner; Rainer K Sachs
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2006-02-10       Impact factor: 1.925

9.  Cancer risks attributable to low doses of ionizing radiation: assessing what we really know.

Authors:  David J Brenner; Richard Doll; Dudley T Goodhead; Eric J Hall; Charles E Land; John B Little; Jay H Lubin; Dale L Preston; R Julian Preston; Jerome S Puskin; Elaine Ron; Rainer K Sachs; Jonathan M Samet; Richard B Setlow; Marco Zaider
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-11-10       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 10.  Ionizing radiation, part 2: some internally deposited radionuclides. Views and expert opinions of an IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Lyon, 14-21 June 2000.

Authors: 
Journal:  IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum       Date:  2001
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.