Literature DB >> 20499135

Dynamic clustering threshold reduces conformer ensemble size while maintaining a biologically relevant ensemble.

Austin B Yongye1, Andreas Bender, Karina Martínez-Mayorga.   

Abstract

Representing the 3D structures of ligands in virtual screenings via multi-conformer ensembles can be computationally intensive, especially for compounds with a large number of rotatable bonds. Thus, reducing the size of multi-conformer databases and the number of query conformers, while simultaneously reproducing the bioactive conformer with good accuracy, is of crucial interest. While clustering and RMSD filtering methods are employed in existing conformer generators, the novelty of this work is the inclusion of a clustering scheme (NMRCLUST) that does not require a user-defined cut-off value. This algorithm simultaneously optimizes the number and the average spread of the clusters. Here we describe and test four inter-dependent approaches for selecting computer-generated conformers, namely: OMEGA, NMRCLUST, RMS filtering and averaged-RMS filtering. The bioactive conformations of 65 selected ligands were extracted from the corresponding protein:ligand complexes from the Protein Data Bank, including eight ligands that adopted dissimilar bound conformations within different receptors. We show that NMRCLUST can be employed to further filter OMEGA-generated conformers while maintaining biological relevance of the ensemble. It was observed that NMRCLUST (containing on average 10 times fewer conformers per compound) performed nearly as well as OMEGA, and both outperformed RMS filtering and averaged-RMS filtering in terms of identifying the bioactive conformations with excellent and good matches (0.5 < RMSD < 1.0 A). Furthermore, we propose thresholds for OMEGA root-mean square filtering depending on the number of rotors in a compound: 0.8, 1.0 and 1.4 for structures with low (1-4), medium (5-9) and high (10-15) numbers of rotatable bonds, respectively. The protocol employed is general and can be applied to reduce the number of conformers in multi-conformer compound collections and alleviate the complexity of downstream data processing in virtual screening experiments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20499135      PMCID: PMC2901495          DOI: 10.1007/s10822-010-9365-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des        ISSN: 0920-654X            Impact factor:   3.686


  32 in total

Review 1.  Structure-activity relationship approaches and applications.

Authors:  Weida Tong; William J Welsh; Leming Shi; Hong Fang; Roger Perkins
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.742

2.  Molecular surface point environments for virtual screening and the elucidation of binding patterns (MOLPRINT 3D).

Authors:  Andreas Bender; Hamse Y Mussa; Gurprem S Gill; Robert C Glen
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2004-12-16       Impact factor: 7.446

3.  Comparative performance assessment of the conformational model generators omega and catalyst: a large-scale survey on the retrieval of protein-bound ligand conformations.

Authors:  Johannes Kirchmair; Gerhard Wolber; Christian Laggner; Thierry Langer
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.956

4.  PHASE: a new engine for pharmacophore perception, 3D QSAR model development, and 3D database screening: 1. Methodology and preliminary results.

Authors:  Steven L Dixon; Alexander M Smondyrev; Eric H Knoll; Shashidhar N Rao; David E Shaw; Richard A Friesner
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2006-11-24       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  Comparison of shape-matching and docking as virtual screening tools.

Authors:  Paul C D Hawkins; A Geoffrey Skillman; Anthony Nicholls
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2007-01-11       Impact factor: 7.446

6.  Contribution of conformer focusing to the uncertainty in predicting free energies for protein-ligand binding.

Authors:  Julian Tirado-Rives; William L Jorgensen
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2006-10-05       Impact factor: 7.446

7.  A distance geometry heuristic for expanding the range of geometries sampled during conformational search.

Authors:  Sergei Izrailev; Fangqiang Zhu; Dimitris K Agrafiotis
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.376

8.  How to optimize shape-based virtual screening: choosing the right query and including chemical information.

Authors:  Johannes Kirchmair; Simona Distinto; Patrick Markt; Daniela Schuster; Gudrun M Spitzer; Klaus R Liedl; Gerhard Wolber
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 4.956

9.  Conformational sampling of druglike molecules with MOE and catalyst: implications for pharmacophore modeling and virtual screening.

Authors:  I-Jen Chen; Nicolas Foloppe
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2008-09-03       Impact factor: 4.956

10.  Conformational energy penalties of protein-bound ligands.

Authors:  J Boström; P O Norrby; T Liljefors
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 3.686

View more
  4 in total

1.  bcl::Cluster : A method for clustering biological molecules coupled with visualization in the Pymol Molecular Graphics System.

Authors:  Nathan Alexander; Nils Woetzel; Jens Meiler
Journal:  IEEE Int Conf Comput Adv Bio Med Sci       Date:  2011-03-14

2.  Allosteric modulation model of the mu opioid receptor by herkinorin, a potent not alkaloidal agonist.

Authors:  A F Marmolejo-Valencia; K Martínez-Mayorga
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Ligand/kappa-opioid receptor interactions: insights from the X-ray crystal structure.

Authors:  Karina Martinez-Mayorga; Kendall G Byler; Austin B Yongye; Marc A Giulianotti; Colette T Dooley; Richard A Houghten
Journal:  Eur J Med Chem       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 6.514

4.  Structure and dynamics of the first archaeal parvulin reveal a new functionally important loop in parvulin-type prolyl isomerases.

Authors:  Łukasz Jaremko; Mariusz Jaremko; Imadeldin Elfaki; Jonathan W Mueller; Andrzej Ejchart; Peter Bayer; Igor Zhukov
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 5.157

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.