Literature DB >> 2049887

Initial clinical results with the Wiktor stent: a new balloon-expandable coronary stent.

A Buchwald1, C Unterberg, G Werner, E Voth, H Kreuzer, V Wiegand.   

Abstract

The Wiktor stent, a new coronary balloon-expandable tantalum stent, was implanted in 17 patients for other wise nonmanageable occlusion after balloon angioplasty (n = 11) and for recurrent restenosis (n = 6). Stents of 3.0 to 4.0 mm were implanted (right coronary artery: n = 10, left anterior descending artery: n = 4, left circumflex artery: n = 2, venous graft: n = 1). All patients were fully anticoagulated initially with heparin followed by coumadin for 3 months and were treated with acetylsalicylic acid indefinitely. Due to its good radiopacity, the device could be placed easily without complications. Early occlusion occurred in one patient after 8 h probably due to friable atheromatous material prolapsing between the meshes of the stent. Late occlusion occurred in another patient who was admitted in cardiogenic shock after pre-hospital reanimation and was stented after occlusive disection following balloon angioplasty of an occluded right coronary artery. In this patient with severe hypoxic brain damage, reocclusion and reinfarction to which the patient finally succumbed occurred following cessation of anticoagulation. Histology demonstrated occlusive thrombosis without evidence of a neointimal covering of the stent. Another thrombotic occlusion due to inadvertent omission of anticoagulation occurred in another patient two weeks after stenting. Control angiography after 6 months in 12 patients revealed restenosis in two patients (50% and 80%). The patient with 80% restenosis of the right coronary artery and pathologic results during stress testing underwent surgical revascularization. The other patient with a 50% restenosis of the right coronary artery was managed medically as he was asymptomatic and without evidence of ischemia during stress testing.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2049887     DOI: 10.1002/clc.4960140504

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cardiol        ISSN: 0160-9289            Impact factor:   2.882


  6 in total

1.  Is provisional stenting the effective option? The WIDEST study (Wiktor stent in de novo stenosis). Widest Trial Investigators' Group.

Authors:  D S Fluck; P Chenu; P Mills; A Davies; J Street; E Paul; R Balcon; C A Layton
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 2.  Revascularization therapy for coronary artery disease. Coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty.

Authors:  J M Wilson; J J Ferguson
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  1995

3.  Clinical experience with the Wiktor stent in native coronary arteries and coronary bypass grafts.

Authors:  S Vaishnav; S Aziz; C Layton
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1994-09

4.  Can early closure and restenosis after endoluminal stenting be predicted from clinical, procedural, and angiographic variables at the time of intervention?

Authors:  E Eeckhout; G van Melle; J C Stauffer; P Vogt; L Kappenberger; J J Goy
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1995-12

Review 5.  The invasive management of angina: issues for consumers and commissioners.

Authors:  D Gunnell; I Harvey; L Smith
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 3.710

6.  Initial and late results of Freedom coronary stent.

Authors:  Y K Ahn; K T Kang; M H Jeong; J C Kang; Y K Park; O K Park
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.884

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.