Literature DB >> 20498609

Single-phase dual-energy CT allows for characterization of renal masses as benign or malignant.

Anno Graser1, Christoph R Becker, Michael Staehler, Dirk A Clevert, Michael Macari, Niko Arndt, Konstantin Nikolaou, Wieland Sommer, Christian Stief, Maximilian F Reiser, Thorsten R C Johnson.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of dual-energy CT (DECT) in renal mass characterization using a single-phase acquisition.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 202 patients (148 males, 54 females; 63 +/- 13 years) with ultrasound-based suspicion of a renal mass underwent unenhanced single energy and nephrographic phase DECT on a dual source scanner (Siemens Somatom Definition Dual Source, n = 174; Somatom Definition Flash, n = 28). Scan parameters for DECT were: tube potential, 80/100 and 100/Sn140 kVp; exposure, 404/300 and 96/232 effective mAs; collimation, 14 x 1.2/32 x 0.6 mm. Two abdominal radiologists assessed DECT and SECT image quality and noise on a 5-point visual analogue scale. Using solely the DE acquisition including virtual nonenhanced (VNE) and color coded iodine images that enable direct visualization of iodine, masses were characterized as benign or malignant. In a second reading session after 34 to 72 (average: 55) days, the same assessment was again performed using both the true nonenhanced (TNE) and nephrographic phase scans thereby simulating conventional single-energy CT. Sensitivities, specificities, diagnostic accuracies, and interpretation times and were recorded for both reading paradigms. Dose reduction of a single-phase over a dual-phase protocol was calculated. Results were tested for statistical significance using the paired Wilcoxon signed rank test and student t test. Differences in sensitivities were tested for significance using the McNemar test.
RESULTS: Of the 202 patients, 115 (56.9%) underwent surgical resection of renal masses. Histopathology showed malignancy in 99 and benign tumors in 18 patients, in 48 patients (23.7%), follow-up imaging showed size stability of lesions diagnosed as benign, and 37 patients (18.3%) had no mass. Based on DECT only, 95/99 (96.0%) patients with malignancy and 96/103 (93.2%) patients without malignancy were correctly identified, for an overall accuracy of 94.6%. The dual-phase approach identified 96/99 (97.0%) and 98/103 (95.1%), accuracy 96.0%, P > 0.05 for both. Mean interpretation time was 2.2 +/- 0.8 minutes for DECT, and 3.5 +/- 1.0 minutes for the dual-phase protocol, P < 0.001. Mean VNE/TNE image quality was 1.68 +/- 0.65/1.30 +/- 0.59, noise was 2.03 +/- 0.57/1.18 +/- 0.29, P < 0.001 for both. Omission of the true unenhanced phase lead to a 48.9 +/- 7.0% dose reduction.
CONCLUSION: DECT allows for fast and accurate characterization of renal masses in a single-phase acquisition. Interpretation of color coded images significantly reduces interpretation time. Omission of a nonenhanced acquisition can reduce radiation exposure by almost 50%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20498609     DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181e33189

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Radiol        ISSN: 0020-9996            Impact factor:   6.016


  49 in total

Review 1.  Dual-energy computed tomography applications in uroradiology.

Authors:  Jong Park; Hersh Chandarana; Michael Macari; Alec J Megibow
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Dual-energy CT with tin filter technology for the discrimination of renal lesion proxies containing blood, protein, and contrast-agent. An experimental phantom study.

Authors:  Christoph Karlo; Arno Lauber; Robert Paul Götti; Stephan Baumüller; Paul Stolzmann; Hans Scheffel; Lotus Desbiolles; Bernhard Schmidt; Borut Marincek; Hatem Alkadhi; Sebastian Leschka
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-08-15       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  [Systemic therapy of renal cell carcinoma].

Authors:  M Staehler; C Tüllmann; P Nuhn; N Haseke; C G Stief
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 0.639

4.  Predictive value of low tube voltage and dual-energy CT for successful shock wave lithotripsy: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Remo Largo; Paul Stolzmann; Christian D Fankhauser; Cédric Poyet; Pirmin Wolfsgruber; Tullio Sulser; Hatem Alkadhi; Sebastian Winklhofer
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  Diagnostic performance of dual-energy CT and subtraction CT for renal lesion detection and characterization.

Authors:  Ali Pourvaziri; Anushri Parakh; Amirkasra Mojtahed; Avinash Kambadakone; Dushyant Vasudeo Sahani
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-05-27       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 6.  Dual energy MDCT assessment of renal lesions: an overview.

Authors:  Achille Mileto; Daniele Marin; Rendon C Nelson; Giorgio Ascenti; Daniel T Boll
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Functional CT imaging techniques for the assessment of angiogenesis in lung cancer.

Authors:  Thomas Henzler; Jingyun Shi; Hashim Jafarov; Stefan O Schoenberg; Christian Manegold; Christian Fink; Gerald Schmid-Bindert
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2012-03

8.  Spectral detector CT for cardiovascular applications.

Authors:  Prabhakar Rajiah; Suhny Abbara; Sandra Simon Halliburton
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2017 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.630

9.  How accurate and precise are CT based measurements of iodine concentration? A comparison of the minimum detectable concentration difference among single source and dual source dual energy CT in a phantom study.

Authors:  André Euler; Justin Solomon; Maciej A Mazurowski; Ehsan Samei; Rendon C Nelson
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Can single-phase dual-energy CT reliably identify adrenal adenomas?

Authors:  A Helck; N Hummel; F G Meinel; T Johnson; K Nikolaou; A Graser
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.