Literature DB >> 20498492

Effects of varying amounts of pronation on the mediolateral ground reaction forces during barefoot versus shod running.

Joanna B Morley1, Leslie M Decker, Tracy Dierks, Daniel Blanke, Jeffrey A French, Nicholas Stergiou.   

Abstract

Despite extensive research on running mechanics, there is still a knowledge gap with respect to the degree of relationship between mediolateral ground reaction forces (ML-GRF) and foot pronation. Our goal was to investigate whether differences exist in ML-GRF among runners that exhibit different degrees of pronation. Seventeen male and 13 female recreational runners ran with and without shoes while ML-GRF and frontal kinematics were collected simultaneously. Subjects were divided into groups based upon their peak eversion (low pronation, middle pronation, high pronation). Discrete parameters from the ML-GRF were peak forces, respective times of occurrence, and impulses. No significant differences were found between groups regarding the magnitude of ML-GRF. Based upon the relative times of occurrence, the peak medial GRF occurred closer to the peak eversion than the peak lateral GRF. Findings support the idea that the ML-GRF have less to do with pronation than previous research suggested.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20498492     DOI: 10.1123/jab.26.2.205

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Biomech        ISSN: 1065-8483            Impact factor:   1.833


  7 in total

Review 1.  The biomechanical differences between barefoot and shod distance running: a systematic review and preliminary meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jonathan P L Hall; Christian Barton; Paul Remy Jones; Dylan Morrissey
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Effect of Acute Alterations in Foot Strike Patterns during Running on Sagittal Plane Lower Limb Kinematics and Kinetics.

Authors:  Kevin A Valenzuela; Scott K Lynn; Lisa R Mikelson; Guillermo J Noffal; Daniel A Judelson
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2015-03-01       Impact factor: 2.988

3.  The Association Between Rearfoot Motion While Barefoot and Shod in Different Types of Running Shoes in Recreational Runners.

Authors:  Érica Q Silva; Andreia N Miana; Jane S S P Ferreira; Henry D Kiyomoto; Mauro C M E Dinato; Isabel C N Sacco
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 2.988

4.  Sexual Dimorphism Impact on the Ground Reaction Force Acting on the Mediolateral Direction During Level Walking: Hip Abductor Muscle Biomechanics and Its Correlation to GRF Moment Arm.

Authors:  Amany E Abd-Eltawab; Mariam A Ameer; Mohamed Ahmed Eladl; Mohamed El-Sherbiny; Hasnaa Ali Ebrahim; Dalia Mahmoud Abdelmonem Elsherbini
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-04-25

5.  Dynamic navicular motion measured using a stretch sensor is different between walking and running, and between over-ground and treadmill conditions.

Authors:  Christian J Barton; Simon L Kappel; Peter Ahrendt; Ole Simonsen; Michael S Rathleff
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 2.303

6.  Sagittal plane fore hoof unevenness is associated with fore and hindlimb asymmetrical force vectors in the sagittal and frontal planes.

Authors:  Sarah Jane Hobbs; Sandra Nauwelaerts; Jonathan Sinclair; Hilary M Clayton; Willem Back
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Relationship between Lower Limb Kinematics and Upper Trunk Acceleration in Recreational Runners.

Authors:  Laura Simoni; Silvia Pancani; Federica Vannetti; Claudio Macchi; Guido Pasquini
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 2.682

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.