BACKGROUND: A pivotal developmental question is whether tubers in tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) form by germline and somatic TSC1 or TSC2 gene mutations. Loss of TSC1 or TSC2 in vitro and in vivo leads to mTORC1 cascade activation and ribosomal protein S6 phosphorylation (P-S6). Giant cells (GCs) in tubers exhibit S6 phosphorylation, suggesting cell-specific loss of TSC gene function. METHODS: TSC1 and TSC2 gene mutations were investigated in DNA extracted from tuber sections (n = 6) and microdissected P-S6-labeled GCs by sequencing and loss of heterozygosity (LOH) analysis to define germline and somatic mutations. RESULTS: A germline TSC1 mutation was defined in 1 case and TSC2 mutations were defined in 5 cases. LOH was not detected in whole tuber sections or microdissected P-S6-labeled GCs. TSC1 and TSC2 were sequenced in microdissected P-S6-immunolabeled GCs. In 5 specimens, a somatic mutation was identified in single GCs that was not detected in whole tuber sections or leukocyte DNA. Four somatic mutations were novel variants (1 nonsense and 3 missense mutations) and 1 additional nonsense somatic mutation was previously reported as a germline mutation. In 1 case, no somatic mutation was identified. There was reduced expression of TSC1 or TSC2 transcripts in the TSC1 or TSC2 associated specimens. In the cases containing a nonsense mutation, no transcript mRNA was detected, suggesting nonsense-mediated degradation. CONCLUSIONS: We provide evidence to support the hypothesis that tubers form by biallelic TSC1 or TSC2 gene inactivation reflecting a "2-hit" mechanism of germline and somatic mutational events. AML = angiomyolipoma; DN = dysplastic neuron; FFPE = formalin fixed, paraffin embedded; GC = giant cell; H-E = hematoxylin and eosin; LOH = loss of heterozygosity; TSC = tuberous sclerosis complex.
BACKGROUND: A pivotal developmental question is whether tubers in tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) form by germline and somatic TSC1 or TSC2 gene mutations. Loss of TSC1 or TSC2 in vitro and in vivo leads to mTORC1 cascade activation and ribosomal protein S6 phosphorylation (P-S6). Giant cells (GCs) in tubers exhibit S6 phosphorylation, suggesting cell-specific loss of TSC gene function. METHODS:TSC1 and TSC2 gene mutations were investigated in DNA extracted from tuber sections (n = 6) and microdissected P-S6-labeled GCs by sequencing and loss of heterozygosity (LOH) analysis to define germline and somatic mutations. RESULTS: A germline TSC1 mutation was defined in 1 case and TSC2 mutations were defined in 5 cases. LOH was not detected in whole tuber sections or microdissected P-S6-labeled GCs. TSC1 and TSC2 were sequenced in microdissected P-S6-immunolabeled GCs. In 5 specimens, a somatic mutation was identified in single GCs that was not detected in whole tuber sections or leukocyte DNA. Four somatic mutations were novel variants (1 nonsense and 3 missense mutations) and 1 additional nonsense somatic mutation was previously reported as a germline mutation. In 1 case, no somatic mutation was identified. There was reduced expression of TSC1 or TSC2 transcripts in the TSC1 or TSC2 associated specimens. In the cases containing a nonsense mutation, no transcript mRNA was detected, suggesting nonsense-mediated degradation. CONCLUSIONS: We provide evidence to support the hypothesis that tubers form by biallelic TSC1 or TSC2 gene inactivation reflecting a "2-hit" mechanism of germline and somatic mutational events. AML = angiomyolipoma; DN = dysplastic neuron; FFPE = formalin fixed, paraffin embedded; GC = giant cell; H-E = hematoxylin and eosin; LOH = loss of heterozygosity; TSC = tuberous sclerosis complex.
Authors: Dharini Jeganathan; Margaret F Fox; Janet M Young; John R W Yates; John P Osborne; Sue Povey Journal: Hum Genet Date: 2002-09-19 Impact factor: 4.132
Authors: S L Dabora; S Jozwiak; D N Franz; P S Roberts; A Nieto; J Chung; Y S Choy; M P Reeve; E Thiele; J C Egelhoff; J Kasprzyk-Obara; D Domanska-Pakiela; D J Kwiatkowski Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2000-12-08 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Phillip Lamparello; Marianna Baybis; John Pollard; Elly M Hol; David D Eisenstat; Eleonora Aronica; Peter B Crino Journal: Brain Date: 2007-09 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Marianna Baybis; Jia Yu; Allana Lee; Jeff A Golden; Howard Weiner; Guy McKhann; Eleonora Aronica; Peter B Crino Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Andrew R Tee; Diane C Fingar; Brendan D Manning; David J Kwiatkowski; Lewis C Cantley; John Blenis Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2002-09-23 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: David M Feliciano; Jennifer L Quon; Tiffany Su; M Morgan Taylor; Angélique Bordey Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2011-11-07 Impact factor: 6.150
Authors: Sharon W Way; Natalia S Rozas; Henry C Wu; James McKenna; R Michelle Reith; S Shahrukh Hashmi; Pramod K Dash; Michael J Gambello Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2012-04-24 Impact factor: 6.150
Authors: Karin Mayer; Christa Fonatsch; Katharina Wimmer; Ans M W van den Ouweland; Anneke J A Maat-Kievit Journal: Eur J Hum Genet Date: 2013-06-12 Impact factor: 4.246
Authors: Angela Volpi; Gabriele Sala; Elena Lesma; Francesca Labriola; Marco Righetti; Rosa Maria Alfano; Mario Cozzolino Journal: J Nephrol Date: 2018-11-07 Impact factor: 3.902
Authors: Kristin M Ikeda; Andrew A House; Dervla M Connaughton; Stephen E Pautler; Victoria Mok Siu; Michelle-Lee Jones Journal: Mol Syndromol Date: 2021-03-09