Literature DB >> 20497880

Is transurethral catheterisation the ideal method of bladder drainage? A survey of patient satisfaction with indwelling transurethral urinary catheters.

Glenn Wei Leong Tan1, Siew Pang Chan, Choon Kiat Ho.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Bladder catheterisation is a routine part of major abdominal surgery. Transurethral catheterisation is the most common method of bladder drainage but is also notorious for its discomfort and increased risk of urinary tract infection. The present study aimed to establish patient satisfaction with transurethral catheterisation and to assess the incidence of clinically significant urinary tract infections after transurethral catheterisation through survey.
METHODS: All patients who underwent major open abdominal surgery between October 2006 and December 2008 and required standard transurethral bladder catheterisation, were asked to participate in the study. Fifty patients were recruited.
RESULTS: Male patients were more dissatisfied than their female counterparts with transurethral catheterisation (satisfaction score: 4.18/10 vs. 2.75/10; p = 0.05). Male patients had more than double the score for pain at the urinary meatus with the catheter in situ (p =0.012) and during urine catheter removal (p = 0.013). Half the patients in the study also had symptoms of urinary tract infection after catheter removal.
CONCLUSION: Our study emphasised the discomfort of transurethral urinary catheters, especially in male patients, and the high incidence of urinary tract infections in both sexes. Consideration should be given to the utilisation of alternative methods of bladder drainage, such as suprapubic catheterisation, which can be performed with ease during laparotomy. Copyright (c) 2010 Asian Surgical Association. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20497880     DOI: 10.1016/S1015-9584(10)60006-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Asian J Surg        ISSN: 1015-9584            Impact factor:   2.767


  6 in total

1.  Early removal of urinary drainage in patients receiving epidural analgesia after colorectal surgery within an ERAS protocol is feasible.

Authors:  André Schreiber; Emine Aydil; Uwe Walschus; Anne Glitsch; Maciej Patrzyk; Claus-Dieter Heidecke; Tobias Schulze
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2019-11-09       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  Supra-pubic versus urethral catheter after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: systematic review of current evidence.

Authors:  Riccardo Bertolo; Andrew Tracey; Prokar Dasgupta; Bernardo Rocco; Salvatore Micali; Giampaolo Bianchi; Lance Hampton; Ash K Tewari; Francesco Porpiglia; Riccardo Autorino
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Predictors of catheter-related bladder discomfort after urological surgery.

Authors:  Cong Li; Zheng Liu; Fan Yang
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2014-08-19

4.  Suprapubic versus transurethral bladder drainage following reconstructive pelvic surgery: a comparison of patient satisfaction and quality of life.

Authors:  Michelle M Takase-Sanchez; Jennifer C Thompson; Douglass S Hale; Michael H Heit
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Postoperative patient comfort in suprapubic drainage versus transurethral catheterization following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a prospective randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Nina Harke; Michael Godes; Jawid Habibzada; Katarina Urbanova; Christian Wagner; Henrik Zecha; Mustapha Addali; Jorn H Witt
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Voiding trial outcome following pelvic floor repair without incontinence procedures.

Authors:  Rui Wang; Sara Won; Miriam J Haviland; Emily Von Bargen; Michele R Hacker; Janet Li; Roger Lefevre
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 2.894

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.