Literature DB >> 20497863

Comprehensive echocardiographic assessment of normal mitral Medtronic Hancock II, Medtronic Mosaic, and Carpentier-Edwards Perimount bioprostheses early after implantation.

Lori A Blauwet1, Joseph F Malouf, Heidi M Connolly, David O Hodge, Katie N Evans, Regina M Herges, Thoralf M Sundt, Fletcher A Miller.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Normal Doppler-derived hemodynamic data for mitral valve bioprostheses are limited.
METHODS: To establish parameters for identifying normal function for each of the 3 types of bioprostheses examined, we conducted a comprehensive, retrospective, two-dimensional, and Doppler echocardiographic assessment of 179 patients who underwent implantation of the Medtronic Hancock II or the Medtronic Mosaic (Medtronic, Inc, Minneapolis, MN) porcine mitral valve bioprosthesis or the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount (Edwards Lifesciences LLC, Irvine, CA) bovine pericardial mitral valve bioprosthesis.
RESULTS: All bioprostheses were normal by clinical examination, intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography, and postoperative transthoracic echocardiography. Regardless of valve type and body surface area, the pressure half-time was < 124 ms in all patients. Mean gradient < 9.5 mm Hg, mitral E velocity < 2.6 m/s, mitral valve prosthesis time-velocity integral < 69 cm, and ratio of the mitral valve prosthesis time-velocity integral to the left ventricular outflow tract time-velocity integral < 3.4 were recorded in nearly all patients.
CONCLUSION: These cutoff values (mean + 2 standard deviation) are specific, but not sensitive, for identifying mitral valve prosthesis dysfunction. Prostheses with hemodynamic values that are higher than these cutoff values are likely dysfunctional, but in select cases, mitral valve prosthesis dysfunction may be present even when hemodynamic values are lower than these thresholds. Copyright 2010 American Society of Echocardiography. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20497863     DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2010.03.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr        ISSN: 0894-7317            Impact factor:   5.251


  3 in total

1.  One-Year Outcomes of Mitral Valve-in-Valve Using the SAPIEN 3 Transcatheter Heart Valve.

Authors:  Brian Whisenant; Samir R Kapadia; Mackram F Eleid; Susheel K Kodali; James M McCabe; Amar Krishnaswamy; Michael Morse; Richard W Smalling; Mark Reisman; Michael Mack; William W O'Neill; Vinayak N Bapat; Martin B Leon; Charanjit S Rihal; Raj R Makkar; Mayra Guerrero
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 14.676

2.  Functional assessment of bioprosthetic mitral valves by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: An in vitro validation and comparison to Doppler echocardiography.

Authors:  Dimitrios Maragiannis; Matthew S Jackson; Kyle Autry; Jose H Flores Arredondo; Constantina Aggeli; Dimitrios Tousoulis; William A Zoghbi; Dipan J Shah; Stephen H Little
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 5.364

3.  One-year outcome with a bovine pericardial valve.

Authors:  Jinmiao Chen; Chen He; Minzhi Lv; Yingqiang Guo; Liang Tao; Tao Hong; Chunsheng Wang
Journal:  JTCVS Open       Date:  2020-04-21
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.