Literature DB >> 20497216

Impact of bacterial mutation rate on coevolutionary dynamics between bacteria and phages.

Andrew D Morgan1, Michael B Bonsall, Angus Buckling.   

Abstract

Mutator bacteria are frequently found in natural populations of bacteria and although coevolution with parasitic viruses (phages) is thought to be one reason for their persistence, it remains unclear how the presence of mutators affects coevolutionary dynamics. We hypothesized that phages must themselves adapt more rapidly or go extinct, in the face of rapidly evolving mutator bacteria. We compared the coevolutionary dynamics of wild-type Pseudomonas fluorescens SBW25 with a lytic phage to the dynamics of an isogenic mutator of P. fluorescens SBW25 together with the same phage. At the beginning of the experiment both wild-type bacteria and mutator bacteria coevolved with phages. However, mutators rapidly evolved higher levels of sympatric resistance to phages. The phages were unable to "keep-up" with the mutator bacteria, and these rates of coevolution declined to less than the rates of coevolution between the phages and wild-type bacteria. By the end of the experiment, the sympatric resistance of the mutator bacteria was not significantly different to the sympatric resistance of the wild-type bacteria. This suggests that the importance of mutators in the coevolutionary interactions with a particular phage population is likely to be short-lived. More generally, the results demonstrate that coevolving enemies may escape from Red-Queen dynamics.
© 2010 The Author(s). Journal compilation © 2010 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20497216     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01037.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  13 in total

1.  Effects of sequential and simultaneous applications of bacteriophages on populations of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in vitro and in wax moth larvae.

Authors:  Alex R Hall; Daniel De Vos; Ville-Petri Friman; Jean-Paul Pirnay; Angus Buckling
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 2.  Mechanisms and consequences of diversity-generating immune strategies.

Authors:  Edze R Westra; David Sünderhauf; Mariann Landsberger; Angus Buckling
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 53.106

Review 3.  Coevolution of bacteria and their viruses.

Authors:  František Golais; Jaroslav Hollý; Jana Vítkovská
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 2.099

4.  Co-evolutionary dynamics of the bacteria Vibrio sp. CV1 and phages V1G, V1P1, and V1P2: implications for phage therapy.

Authors:  Camilo Barbosa; Patrick Venail; Angela V Holguin; Martha J Vives
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2013-09-08       Impact factor: 4.552

Review 5.  Movers and shakers: influence of bacteriophages in shaping the mammalian gut microbiota.

Authors:  Susan Mills; Fergus Shanahan; Catherine Stanton; Colin Hill; Aidan Coffey; R Paul Ross
Journal:  Gut Microbes       Date:  2012-09-28

6.  The evolution of bacterial mutation rates under simultaneous selection by interspecific and social parasitism.

Authors:  Siobhán O'Brien; Antonio M M Rodrigues; Angus Buckling
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  What Can Phages Tell Us about Host-Pathogen Coevolution?

Authors:  John J Dennehy
Journal:  Int J Evol Biol       Date:  2012-11-18

8.  Adaptation to Parasites and Costs of Parasite Resistance in Mutator and Nonmutator Bacteria.

Authors:  Sébastien Wielgoss; Tobias Bergmiller; Anna M Bischofberger; Alex R Hall
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 16.240

Review 9.  Bacteriophage Usage for Bacterial Disease Management and Diagnosis in Plants.

Authors:  Nguyen Trung Vu; Chang-Sik Oh
Journal:  Plant Pathol J       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 1.795

10.  Plasmid carriage can limit bacteria-phage coevolution.

Authors:  Ellie Harrison; Julie Truman; Rosanna Wright; Andrew J Spiers; Steve Paterson; Michael A Brockhurst
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.703

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.