Literature DB >> 20497201

Breeding periodicity for male sea turtles, operational sex ratios, and implications in the face of climate change.

Graeme C Hays1, Sabrina Fossette, Kostas A Katselidis, Gail Schofield, Mike B Gravenor.   

Abstract

Species that have temperature-dependent sex determination (TSD) often produce highly skewed offspring sex ratios contrary to long-standing theoretical predictions. This ecological enigma has provoked concern that climate change may induce the production of single-sex generations and hence lead to population extirpation. All species of sea turtles exhibit TSD, many are already endangered, and most already produce sex ratios skewed to the sex produced at warmer temperatures (females). We tracked male loggerhead turtles (Caretta caretta) from Zakynthos, Greece, throughout the entire interval between successive breeding seasons and identified individuals on their breeding grounds, using photoidentification, to determine breeding periodicity and operational sex ratios. Males returned to breed at least twice as frequently as females. We estimated that the hatchling sex ratio of 70:30 female to male for this rookery will translate into an overall operational sex ratio (OSR) (i.e., ratio of total number of males vs females breeding each year) of close to 50:50 female to male. We followed three male turtles for between 10 and 12 months during which time they all traveled back to the breeding grounds. Flipper tagging revealed the proportion of females returning to nest after intervals of 1, 2, 3, and 4 years were 0.21, 0.38, 0.29, and 0.12, respectively (mean interval 2.3 years). A further nine male turtles were tracked for short periods to determine their departure date from the breeding grounds. These departure dates were combined with a photoidentification data set of 165 individuals identified on in-water transect surveys at the start of the breeding season to develop a statistical model of the population dynamics. This model produced a maximum likelihood estimate that males visit the breeding site 2.6 times more often than females (95%CI 2.1, 3.1), which was consistent with the data from satellite tracking and flipper tagging. Increased frequency of male breeding will help ameliorate female-biased hatchling sex ratios. Combined with the ability of males to fertilize the eggs of many females and for females to store sperm to fertilize many clutches, our results imply that effects of climate change on the viability of sea turtle populations are likely to be less acute than previously suspected.
© 2010 Society for Conservation Biology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20497201     DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01531.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conserv Biol        ISSN: 0888-8892            Impact factor:   6.560


  22 in total

1.  Turtle mating patterns buffer against disruptive effects of climate change.

Authors:  Lucy I Wright; Kimberley L Stokes; Wayne J Fuller; Brendan J Godley; Andrew McGowan; Robin Snape; Tom Tregenza; Annette C Broderick
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Population viability at extreme sex-ratio skews produced by temperature-dependent sex determination.

Authors:  Graeme C Hays; Antonios D Mazaris; Gail Schofield; Jacques-Olivier Laloë
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Predicting connectivity of green turtles at Palmyra Atoll, central Pacific: a focus on mtDNA and dispersal modelling.

Authors:  Eugenia Naro-Maciel; Stephen J Gaughran; Nathan F Putman; George Amato; Felicity Arengo; Peter H Dutton; Katherine W McFadden; Erin C Vintinner; Eleanor J Sterling
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Satellite tracking reveals sex-specific migration distance in green turtles (Chelonia mydas).

Authors:  Martin Beal; Paulo Catry; Aissa Regalla; Castro Barbosa; António J Pires; Julie Mestre; Cheibani Senhoury; Ebaye Sidina; Ana Rita Patrício
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 3.812

5.  Marine turtles are only minimally sexually size dimorphic, a pattern that is distinct from most nonmarine aquatic turtles.

Authors:  Christine Figgener; Joseph Bernardo; Pamela T Plotkin
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 3.167

6.  Using satellite tracking to optimize protection of long-lived marine species: olive ridley sea turtle conservation in Central Africa.

Authors:  Sara M Maxwell; Greg A Breed; Barry A Nickel; Junior Makanga-Bahouna; Edgard Pemo-Makaya; Richard J Parnell; Angela Formia; Solange Ngouessono; Brendan J Godley; Daniel P Costa; Matthew J Witt; Michael S Coyne
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The role of geomagnetic cues in green turtle open sea navigation.

Authors:  Simon Benhamou; Joël Sudre; Jérome Bourjea; Stéphane Ciccione; Angelo De Santis; Paolo Luschi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-26       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Breeding sex ratios in adult leatherback turtles (Dermochelys coriacea) may compensate for female-biased hatchling sex ratios.

Authors:  Kelly R Stewart; Peter H Dutton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Movements and habitat-use of loggerhead sea turtles in the northern Gulf of Mexico during the reproductive period.

Authors:  Kristen M Hart; Margaret M Lamont; Autumn R Sartain; Ikuko Fujisaki; Brail S Stephens
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Conservation hotspots for the turtles on the high seas of the Atlantic Ocean.

Authors:  Hsiang-Wen Huang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.