Literature DB >> 20496589

Host associations of Dermacentor, Amblyomma, and Ixodes (Acari: Ixodidae) ticks in Tennessee.

S B Cohen1, J D Freye, B G Dunlap, J R Dunn, T F Jones, A C Moncayo.   

Abstract

From April 2007 to September 2008, 1,793 adult and nymphal ixodid ticks were collected from 49 counties in Tennessee. Six species were identified, including Dermacentor variabilis (Say), Amblyomma americanum (L.), Ixodes texanus (Banks), Ixodes cookei Packard, Ixodes scapularis (Say), and Amblyomma maculatum Koch, from 13 medium- to large-sized mammalian hosts and dragging through vegetation. Raccoons were the most common vertebrate source (198 captures), accounting for 60% of ticks collected. Dermacentor variabilis was the predominant species from raccoons with a prevalence of 92% and mean intensity of 5.3. A. americanum was predominated in white-tailed deer and drags with respective mean intensities of 3.1 and 14.1 and prevalence values of 94%. All tick species were identified between April and August, coinciding with the majority of animal captures. Only A. americanum, I. texanus, and I. cookei were identified from 22 animal captures from November to March. I. texanus and I. cookei were more common in the eastern portions of the state, but this may be a result of higher raccoon captures in those areas. Only four specimens of I. scapularis were collected in this study, which may reflect the absence of small mammal or reptile captures. Two A. maculatum were collected, and we report new distribution records in Tennessee for this species. Despite unequal sampling among ecoregions, the large numbers of D. variabilis and A. americanum from multiple host species suggest their widespread distribution throughout the state. These species of ticks can transmit multiple pathogens, including spotted fever group rickettsiae and ehrlichiae.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20496589     DOI: 10.1603/me09065

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Entomol        ISSN: 0022-2585            Impact factor:   2.278


  10 in total

1.  Absence of Rickettsia rickettsii and occurrence of other spotted fever group rickettsiae in ticks from Tennessee.

Authors:  Abelardo C Moncayo; Sara B Cohen; Charissa M Fritzen; Eileen Huang; Michael J Yabsley; James D Freye; Brett G Dunlap; Junjun Huang; Daniel G Mead; Timothy F Jones; John R Dunn
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.345

2.  A standardized method for the construction of a tick drag/flag sampling approach and evaluation of sampling efficacy.

Authors:  Brent C Newman; William B Sutton; Yong Wang; Callie J Schweitzer; Abelardo C Moncayo; Brian T Miller
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 2.132

Review 3.  Emerging Tick-Borne Diseases.

Authors:  Susan Madison-Antenucci; Laura D Kramer; Linda L Gebhardt; Elizabeth Kauffman
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2020-01-02       Impact factor: 26.132

4.  Reported County-Level Distribution of the American Dog Tick (Acari: Ixodidae) in the Contiguous United States.

Authors:  Aine Lehane; Christina Parise; Colleen Evans; Lorenza Beati; William L Nicholson; Rebecca J Eisen
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 2.278

5.  Arachnids of medical importance in Brazil: main active compounds present in scorpion and spider venoms and tick saliva.

Authors:  Francielle A Cordeiro; Fernanda G Amorim; Fernando A P Anjolette; Eliane C Arantes
Journal:  J Venom Anim Toxins Incl Trop Dis       Date:  2015-08-13

6.  Reviewing the Potential Vectors and Hosts of African Swine Fever Virus Transmission in the United States.

Authors:  Andrew J Golnar; Estelle Martin; Jillian D Wormington; Rebekah C Kading; Pete D Teel; Sarah A Hamer; Gabriel L Hamer
Journal:  Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 2.133

7.  The wild life of ticks: Using passive surveillance to determine the distribution and wildlife host range of ticks and the exotic Haemaphysalis longicornis, 2010-2021.

Authors:  Alec T Thompson; Seth A White; Emily E Doub; Prisha Sharma; Kenna Frierson; Kristen Dominguez; David Shaw; Dustin Weaver; Stacey L Vigil; Denise L Bonilla; Mark G Ruder; Michael J Yabsley
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2022-09-20       Impact factor: 4.047

8.  Social-ecological factors determine spatial variation in human incidence of tick-borne ehrlichiosis.

Authors:  B R Bayles; B F Allan
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 4.434

9.  Habitat and Vegetation Variables Are Not Enough When Predicting Tick Populations in the Southeastern United States.

Authors:  R T Trout Fryxell; J E Moore; M D Collins; Y Kwon; S R Jean-Philippe; S M Schaeffer; A Odoi; M Kennedy; A E Houston
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Passive Animal Surveillance to Identify Ticks in Wisconsin, 2011-2017.

Authors:  Xia Lee; Darby S Murphy; Diep Hoang Johnson; Susan M Paskewitz
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2019-09-08       Impact factor: 2.769

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.