Literature DB >> 20496130

Resection of rectal cancer: a historical review.

Yasuhiro Inoue1, Masato Kusunoki.   

Abstract

Local control of rectal cancer and patient survival have improved remarkably with advances in surgical techniques and adjuvant therapy. By applying advanced surgical principles, surgeons can now excise most rectal cancers completely, often preserving the anal sphincter and leaving the patient with relatively normal bowel and pelvic function. Historically, the earliest surgical approaches to rectal cancer were via the perineum. As surgical techniques and general anesthesia improved, other approaches such as a posterior approach were undertaken to improve access to the whole rectum. Consequently, abdominoperineal resection became the standard treatment until anterior resection was introduced for proximal rectal cancers. The most important surgical breakthrough in recent years has been the advent of total mesorectal excision (TME). The emphasis in rectal cancer surgery is on preservation of function, with dissection being done in appropriate anatomical planes. Thus, mobilization of the rectum has a long history, and is seen in modern procedures including TME and intersphincter resection. This article reviews the progression of the surgical management of rectal cancer with reference to historical perspectives. We discuss the major surgical considerations for mobilization of the rectum in several surgical procedures, from conventional operations to modern standardized TME.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20496130     DOI: 10.1007/s00595-009-4153-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Today        ISSN: 0941-1291            Impact factor:   2.549


  37 in total

1.  Iatrogenic impotence and rectal dissection.

Authors:  I Lindsey; N J McC Mortensen
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  A histological study of Denonvilliers' fascia and its relationship to the neurovascular bundle.

Authors:  J Kourambas; D G Angus; P Hosking; S T Chou
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1998-09

3.  Surgical procedures for carcinoma of the rectum. A historical review.

Authors:  R E Breen; W Garnjobst
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 4.585

4.  Colorectal surgery from antiguity to the modern era.

Authors:  M J Graney; C M Graney
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 5.  Consensus statement of definitions for anorectal physiology and rectal cancer: report of the Tripartite Consensus Conference on Definitions for Anorectal Physiology and Rectal Cancer, Washington, D.C., May 1, 1999.

Authors:  A C Lowry; C L Simmang; P Boulos; K C Farmer; P J Finan; N Hyman; M Killingback; D Z Lubowski; R Moore; C Penfold; P Savoca; R Stitz; J J Tjandra
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.585

6.  Preiminary investigation of the pharmacology of the human internal anal sphincter.

Authors:  A G Parks; D J Fishlock; J D Cameron; H May
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1969-08       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Resection of the rectum with construction of a colonic reservoir and colo-anal anastomosis for carcinoma of the rectum.

Authors:  F Lazorthes; P Fages; P Chiotasso; J Lemozy; E Bloom
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  The inferior hypogastric plexus (pelvic plexus): its importance in neural preservation techniques.

Authors:  B Mauroy; X Demondion; A Drizenko; E Goullet; J-L Bonnal; J Biserte; C Abbou
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2003-04-11       Impact factor: 1.246

9.  Rectal cancer: anterior resection with per anal colo-anal anastomosis. The results in 76 patients treated by Sir Alan Parks.

Authors:  R J Nicholls
Journal:  Bull Cancer       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 1.276

10.  The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery--the clue to pelvic recurrence?

Authors:  R J Heald; E M Husband; R D Ryall
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  10 in total

1.  Preoperative evaluation of the depth of anal canal invasion in very low rectal cancer by magnetic resonance imaging and surgical indications for intersphincteric resection.

Authors:  Yoshiko Bamba; Michio Itabashi; Shingo Kameoka
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Prognostic significance of glucose transporter-1 (GLUT1) gene expression in rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Susumu Saigusa; Yuji Toiyama; Koji Tanaka; Yoshinaga Okugawa; Hiroyuki Fujikawa; Kohei Matsushita; Keiichi Uchida; Yasuhiro Inoue; Masato Kusunoki
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) using a new disposable device: our initial experience.

Authors:  G Sevá-Pereira; V L Trombeta; L G Capochim Romagnolo
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 4.  Chemoradiotherapy followed by restorative proctocolectomy with partial intersphincteric resection for advanced rectal cancer associated with ulcerative colitis: report of a case.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Inoue; Toshimitsu Araki; Yoshinaga Okugawa; Aya Kawamoto; Junichiro Hiro; Yuji Toiyama; Koji Tanaka; Keiichi Uchida; Yasuhiko Mohri; Masato Kusunoki
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2013-03-24       Impact factor: 2.549

5.  Case of isolated lateral lymph node recurrence occurring after TME for T1 lower rectal cancer treated with lateral lymph node dissection: report of a case.

Authors:  Toshinori Sueda; Shingo Noura; Masayuki Ohue; Tatsushi Shingai; Shinya Imada; Yoshiyuki Fujiwara; Hiroaki Ohigashi; Masahiko Yano; Yasuhiko Tomita; Osamu Ishikawa
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 2.549

6.  Prognostic significance of a preoperative magnetic resonance imaging assessment of the distance of mesorectal extension in clinical T3 lower rectal cancer.

Authors:  Toshinori Sueda; Masayuki Ohue; Shingo Noura; Tatsushi Shingai; Katsuyuki Nakanishi; Masahiko Yano
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 2.549

7.  Surgical outcome after standard abdominoperineal resection: A 15-year cohort study from a single cancer centre.

Authors:  S Wilkins; R Yap; K Loon; M Staples; K Oliva; B Ruggiero; P McMurrick; P Carne
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2018-10-31

8.  Retrospective study of the functional and oncological outcomes of conformal sphincter preservation operation in the treatment of very low rectal cancer.

Authors:  G Sun; Z Lou; H Zhang; G Y Yu; K Zheng; X H Gao; R G Meng; H F Gong; E J B Furnée; C G Bai; W Zhang
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2020-05-02       Impact factor: 3.781

9.  Surgical Techniques for Abdominoperineal Resection for Rectal Cancer: One Size Does Not Fit All.

Authors:  Simon Wilkins; Raymond Yap; Shehara Mendis; Peter Carne; Paul J McMurrick
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-02-24

10.  Overall treatment outcome - analysis of long-term results of rectal cancer treatment on the basis of a new parameter.

Authors:  Michal Jankowski; Dariusz Bała; Manuela Las-Jankowska; Wojciech Maria Wysocki; Tomasz Nowikiewicz; Wojciech Zegarski
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 3.318

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.