P Demakakos1, M Hamer, E Stamatakis, A Steptoe. 1. Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK. p.demakakos@ucl.ac.uk
Abstract
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: We examined whether small amounts of low-intensity physical activity were associated with reduced risk of developing type 2 diabetes in a national sample of people aged 50 years and over. METHODS: The sample comprised 7,466 individuals (55.9% women) free from self-reported doctor-diagnosed diabetes and was prospectively followed for a mean of 45.3 months. Baseline self-reported physical activity was categorised as physical inactivity, low- and vigorous/moderate-intensity physical activity at least once a week. Cox proportional hazard regression was used to model the association between baseline physical activity and incident type 2 diabetes. RESULTS: Vigorous/moderate-intensity physical activity at least once a week was associated with reduced risk of type 2 diabetes (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.43-0.95, p = 0.026) but low-intensity physical activity at least once a week was not (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.58-1.30, p = 0.497) after adjustment for all covariates. However, age-stratified analysis showed that low-intensity physical activity at least once a week was associated with reduced risk of type 2 diabetes for those aged 70 years and over (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.28-1.02, p = 0.059), but not for those aged 50 to 59 years (HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.52-2.29, p = 0.828) or those aged 60 to 69 years (HR 1.15, 95% CI 0.55-2.41, p = 0.715) after adjustment for all covariates. CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: Compared with physical inactivity, any type of physical activity was associated with reduced risk of type 2 diabetes in adults aged 70 years and over, while in adults aged 50 to 69 years, physical activity needed to be vigorous/moderate in intensity to be associated with reduced risk of type 2 diabetes.
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: We examined whether small amounts of low-intensity physical activity were associated with reduced risk of developing type 2 diabetes in a national sample of people aged 50 years and over. METHODS: The sample comprised 7,466 individuals (55.9% women) free from self-reported doctor-diagnosed diabetes and was prospectively followed for a mean of 45.3 months. Baseline self-reported physical activity was categorised as physical inactivity, low- and vigorous/moderate-intensity physical activity at least once a week. Cox proportional hazard regression was used to model the association between baseline physical activity and incident type 2 diabetes. RESULTS: Vigorous/moderate-intensity physical activity at least once a week was associated with reduced risk of type 2 diabetes (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.43-0.95, p = 0.026) but low-intensity physical activity at least once a week was not (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.58-1.30, p = 0.497) after adjustment for all covariates. However, age-stratified analysis showed that low-intensity physical activity at least once a week was associated with reduced risk of type 2 diabetes for those aged 70 years and over (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.28-1.02, p = 0.059), but not for those aged 50 to 59 years (HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.52-2.29, p = 0.828) or those aged 60 to 69 years (HR 1.15, 95% CI 0.55-2.41, p = 0.715) after adjustment for all covariates. CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: Compared with physical inactivity, any type of physical activity was associated with reduced risk of type 2 diabetes in adults aged 70 years and over, while in adults aged 50 to 69 years, physical activity needed to be vigorous/moderate in intensity to be associated with reduced risk of type 2 diabetes.
Authors: G Hu; Q Qiao; K Silventoinen; J G Eriksson; P Jousilahti; J Lindström; T T Valle; A Nissinen; J Tuomilehto Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2003-02-06 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Jaana Lindström; Markku Peltonen; Johan G Eriksson; Sirkka Aunola; Helena Hämäläinen; Pirjo Ilanne-Parikka; Sirkka Keinänen-Kiukaanniemi; Matti Uusitupa; Jaakko Tuomilehto Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2008-02-05 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Vijay R Varma; Erwin J Tan; Tao Wang; Qian-Li Xue; Linda P Fried; Christopher L Seplaki; Abby C King; Teresa E Seeman; George W Rebok; Michelle C Carlson Journal: J Appl Gerontol Date: 2013-12-11