| Literature DB >> 20495792 |
Gunhild Melhus1, S H Brorson, E S Baekkevold, G Andersson, R Jemtland, O K Olstad, F P Reinholt.
Abstract
An experimental rat model was used to test the hypothesis that in osteoporosis (OP) the molecular composition of the extracellular matrix in the fracture callus is disturbed. OP was induced at 10 weeks of age by ovariectomy and a vitamin D(3)-deficient diet, and sham-operated animals fed normal diet served as controls. Three months later a closed tibial fracture was made and stabilized with an intramedullary nail. After 3 and 6 weeks of healing, the animals were killed and the fracture calluses examined with global gene expression, in situ mRNA expression, and ultrastructural protein distribution of four bone turnover markers: osteopontin, bone sialoprotein, tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase, and cathepsin K. Global gene expression showed a relatively small number of differently regulated genes, mostly upregulated and at 3 weeks. The four chosen markers were not differently regulated, and only minor differences in the in situ mRNA expression and ultrastructural protein distribution were detected. Gene expression and composition of fracture calluses are not generally disturbed in experimental OP.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20495792 PMCID: PMC2887935 DOI: 10.1007/s00223-010-9371-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Calcif Tissue Int ISSN: 0171-967X Impact factor: 4.333
Primer sequences for DIG-labeled cRNA probes
| Sequence name | Sequence forward | Sequence reverse |
|---|---|---|
| CTK | 5′-agacgcttacccgtatgtgg-3′ | 5′-tggagagaagggaagcagag-3′ |
| BSP | 5′-atggagatggcgatagttcg-3′ | 5′-tgaaacccgttcagaaggac-3′ |
| OPN | 5′-ctctgatcaggacagcaacg-3′ | 5′-tcagggcccaaaacactatc-3′ |
Fig. 1DXA measurements of BMD in femoral neck (upper panel) and lumbar vertebrae (lower panel) (a) and fracture area (b) [9]. BMD in the femoral neck was significantly lower in OVX-D animals compared to sham at all measured time points (*P < 0.01). There were no significant differences between the right and left femoral neck. BMD in the fractured area did not differ significantly at any time points
Fig. 2Light micrographs of the fracture/callus area in the OVX-D and sham groups at 3 and 6 weeks of healing. After 3 weeks OVX-D (a) and sham (b) appeared with bridging of callus gap and periosteal callus. After 6 weeks OVX-D (c) and sham (d) presented a more remodeled callus, although heterogeneity still was present. Paraffin-embedded section, H&E staining, ×4 magnification
Callus histomorphometry: callus composition
| Week | Group |
| Woven bone | Cartilage | Fibrous connective tissue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | OVX-D* | 6 | 0.40 ± 0.13 | 0.34 ± 0.054 | 0.26 ± 0.14 |
| Sham | 7 | 0.37 ± 0.21 | 0.29 ± 0.12 | 0.35 ± 0.28 | |
| 6 | OVX-D | 5 | 0.56 ± 0.052 | 0.24 ± 0.089 | 0.19 ± 0.10 |
| Sham | 3 | 0.37 ± 0.18 | 0.34 ± 0.16 | 0.29 ± 0.32 |
Values are mean (%) ± SD. * Significantly different in overall composition compared to sham (P = 0.02)
Callus histomorphometry: cell types covering callus surfaces
| Week | Group |
| Ob.S | Oc.S | Other cells/eroded surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | OVX-D | 6 | 0.78 ± 0.029 | 0.064 ± 0.029 | 0.16 ± 0.044 |
| Sham | 7 | 0.72 ± 0.060 | 0.10 ± 0.055 | 0.18 ± 0.08 | |
| 6 | OVX-D | 5 | 0.72 ± 0.080 | 0.040 ± 0.037 | 0.24 ± 0.071 |
| Sham | 3 | 0.53 ± 0.17 | 0.13 ± 0.084 | 0.34 ± 0.11 |
Values are mean (%) ± SD. Ob.S, osteoblast surface; Oc.S, osteoclast surface
Fig. 3Differentially expressed genes in the OVX-D group. DNA microarray analysis showed a larger number of annotated genes differently regulated in the OVX-D group compared to sham, the majority in an increased fashion and mostly after 3 weeks of healing. No genes encoding collagens or known matrix proteins were differentially regulated. Fold change ≥2, P ≤ 0.05
Gene profiling of TRAP, OPN, BSP, and CTK
| Gene ID | Gene name | Gene symbol | FC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 weeks | 6 weeks | |||
| 1367942_at | Tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5 (TRAP) |
| 1.26 | 1.22 |
| 1367581_a_at | Secreted phosphoprotein 1 (OPN) |
| 1.74 | 0.83 |
| 1368416_at | Integrin binding sialoprotein (BSP) |
| 0.91 | 1.00 |
| 1369947_at | Cathepsin K (CTK) |
| 1.74 | 0.91 |
DNA microarray showed no differences between the OVX-D and sham groups in gene expression for the four bone remodeling markers TRAP, OPN, BSP, and CTK. FC (fold change) ≥2
Fig. 4OPN, BSP, TRAP, and CTK mRNA-positive cells in fracture callus at 3 weeks visualized by ISH. OPN mRNA (a) and BSP mRNA (c) positive osteoblasts, TRAP mRNA (b) and CTK mRNA (d) positive osteoclasts (arrows). WB, woven bone. CB, cortical bone. Paraffin-embedded sections, ×20 magnification
Semiquantitative ISH for TRAP, CTK, OPN, and BSP
| mRNA | Group |
| 3 weeks | 6 weeks |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRAP | OVX-D | 6/5 | 0.20 ± 0.14 | 0.068 ± 0.053 |
| Sham | 7/4 | 0.11 ± 0.052 | 0.18 ± 0.14 | |
| CTK | OVX-D | 7/5 | 0.17 ± 0.095** | 0.059 ± 0.032 |
| Sham | 7/4 | 0.18 ± 0.094 | 0.14 ± 0.14 | |
| OPN | OVX-D | 7/5 | 0.33 ± 0.15*,** | 0.12 ± 0.047 |
| Sham | 7/4 | 0.19 ± 0.059 | 0.12 ± 0.085 | |
| BSP | OVX-D | 7/5 | 0.21 ± 0.14** | 0.022 ± 0.034 |
| Sham | 7/4 | 0.32 ± 0.19 | 0.18 ± 0.089* |
Results are mean ± SD. n, number of animals in the OVX-D and sham groups, respectively
* Significant difference between the groups (P ≤ 0.05); ** Significant difference between 3 and 6 weeks in the group (P ≤ 0.05)
Fig. 5Characteristic ultrastructural protein distribution of OPN and BSP. Micrographs of low-temperature embedded callus tissue after 3 weeks of healing incubated with gold-conjugated rabbit anti-rat antibodies against OPN and BSP. Immunogold signaling for OPN (a) with distinct accumulation along a cement line (arrows) as previous described [52]. Intense BSP signaling (b) at early focus of mineralization, i.e., “mineralization noduli” (arrows). OC, osteocyte canaliculi. Lowicryl HM23-embedded, ×43,000 magnification
Fig. 6Characteristic ultrastructural protein distribution of CTK and TRAP. Micrographs of low-temperature embedded callus tissue after 3 weeks of healing showing an active resorbing osteoclast attached to a bone surface (a) (×1,900). Micrographs sampled at the ruffled border of the osteoclast in (a) at higher magnification (×43,000), incubated with gold-conjugated rabbit anti-rat antibodies against CTK (b) and TRAP (c). Immunogold signaling for both CTK and TRAP showed accumulation in the osteoclast cytoplasm and in the ECM facing the ruffled border. Lowicryl HM23-embedded
Protein distribution of OPN and BSP in the fracture callus at 3 and 6 weeks
| Cell type | ROI | 3 weeks | 6 weeks | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OPN | BSP | OPN | BSP | ||||||
| Ovx-D ( | Sham ( | Ovx-D ( | Sham ( | Ovx-D ( | Sham ( | Ovx-D ( | Sham ( | ||
| OB | Nuc. | 2.38 ± 3.07 | 2.30 ± 1.00 | 4.06 ± 3.56 | 2.98 ± 1.67 | 1.32 ± 0.92 | 1.25 ± 0.87 | 1.70 ± 0.57 | 1.69 ± 0.70 |
| Cyt. | 2.84 ± 3.42 | 2.66 ± 1.18 | 3.66 ± 2.32 | 3.69 ± 1.50 | 1.04 ± 0.41 | 0.99 ± 0.21 | 1.41 ± 0.47 | 2.06 ± 1.37 | |
| O | 1.83 ± 1.04 | 1.94 ± 1.40 | 6.63 ± 6.83 | 2.52 ± 0.56 | 1.89 ± 0.30 | 1.65 ± 0.87 | 1.62 ± 0.27 | 1.83 ± 0.24 | |
| MF | 57.58 ± 28.38 | 38.11 ± 12.11 | 421.22 ± 343.93 | 311.52 ± 30.65 | 42.43 ± 5.16 | 51.18 ± 18.89 | 176.40 ± 27.92 | 308.72 ± 58.98 | |
| WB | 3.66 ± 0.52 | 3.56 ± 2.98 | 116.87 ± 102.09 | 75.66 ± 29.31 | 1.75 ± 0.66 | 3.03 ± 2.37 | 32.50 ± 8.94 | 81.51 ± 39.75 | |
| BG | 0.14 ± 0.09 | 1.26 ± 0.96 | 1.95 ± 1.47 | 1.16 ± 0.60 | 0.19 ± 0.04 | 0.39 ± 0.18 | 17.79 ± 17.79 | 0.40 ± 0.13 | |
| ( | ( | ( | ( | ( | ( | ( | ( | ||
Sections were incubated with polyclonal rabbit antibodies against rat proteins, and bound antibodies were visualized by 10-nm colloidal gold particles coated with protein A. By the use of TEM and random sampling of cells in the tissue, micrographs were analyzed with respect to immunolabeling in predetermined compartments (i.e., in the cell nucleus and cytoplasm, in the unmineralized osteoid, at osteoid-bone interface and in mineralized woven bone (osteoblasts), and in matrix outside and inside the ruffled border and the clear zone (osteoclasts), and finally in the capillary lumen as a measure of background). Values are mean gold particles per μm2 ± SD. ROI, region of interest/compartment; OB, osteoblast; OC, osteoclast; Nuc, nucleus; Cyt, cell cytoplasm, O, osteoid; MF, mineralization front; WB, woven bone; RBc, cell cytoplasm facing the ruffled border; RBm, extracellular matrix facing the ruffled border; CZc, cell cytoplasm facing the clear zone; CZm, extracellular matrix facing the clear zone; BG, background, i.e. capillary lumen. When overall protein distribution was compared between the groups, no significant differences were detected
aReduced number of observations; i.e., the cell domain was not found in all animals
Protein distribution of TRAP and CTK in the fracture callus at 3 and 6 weeks of healing
| Cell type | ROI | 3 weeks | 6 weeks | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRAP | CTK* | TRAP | CTK | ||||||
| Ovx-D ( | Sham ( | Ovx-D ( | Sham ( | Ovx-D ( | Sham ( | Ovx-D ( | Sham** ( | ||
| OC | Nuc | 1.04 ± 0.44 | 0.77 ± 0.37 | 1.22 ± 0.40 | 0.74 ± 0.17 | 1.37 ± 1.10 | 0.60 ± 0.32 | 0.94 ± 0.05 | 1.10 ± 0.46 |
| Cyt | 6.60 ± 1.66 | 6.33 ± 2.70 | 6.00 ± 1.92 | 3.67 ± 0.25 | 4.98 ± 1.33 | 2.93 ± 0.40 | 5.56 ± 3.77 | 4.12 ± 1.04 | |
| RBc | 2.72 ± 1.28 | 2.64 ± 1.83 | 1.77 ± 1.04 | 1.58 ± 0.34 | 0.78 ± 0.49 | 0.57 ± 0.16 | 1.48 ± 1.28 | 1.73 ± 0.68 | |
| RBm | 12.76 ± 6.86 | 13.76 ± 9.74 | 4.13 ± 2.43 | 3.60 ± 0.73 | 2.46 ± 0.85 | 2.93 ± 2.00 | 5.85 ± 4.23 | 3.07 ± 1.82 | |
| CZc | 1.54 ± 0.32 | 1.33 ± 0.70 | 1.70 ± 0.41 | 1.98 ± 0.55 | 1.43 ± 1.12 | 0.92 ± 0.43 | 2.07 ± 1.22 | 3.80 ± 1.84 | |
| CZm | 5.95 ± 3.34 | 12.65 ± 9.07 | 2.82 ± 1.31 | 2.40 ± 0.27 | 2.07 ± 0.48 | 2.78 ± 2.40 | 5.82 (−) | 2.50 ± 1.36 | |
| BG | 1.03 ± 0.53 | 0.65 ± 0.34 | 0.68 ± 0.39 | 0.76 ± 0.24 | 1.10 ± 0.82 | 0.62 ± 0.21 | 0.82 ± 0.16 | 0.88 ± 0.46 | |
Sections were incubated with polyclonal rabbit antibodies against rat proteins, and bound antibodies were visualized by 10-nm colloidal gold particles coated with protein A. By the use of TEM and random sampling of cells in the tissue, micrographs were analyzed with respect to immunolabeling in predetermined compartments (i.e., in the matrix outside and inside the ruffled border and the clear zone of osteoclasts, and finally in the capillary lumen as a measure of background). Values are mean gold particles per um2 ± SD. ROI, region of interest/compartment; OC, osteoclast; nuc, nucleus; cyt, cell cytoplasm; RBc, cell cytoplasm facing the ruffled border; RBm, extracellular matrix facing the ruffled border; CZc, cell cytoplasm facing the clear zone; CZm, extracellular matrix facing the clear zone; BG, background, i.e. capillary lumen
*p = 0.05 compared to sham in overall protein distribution, **p = 0.01 compared to the overall distribution in the sham group at 3 weeks