Literature DB >> 20495655

Escalating computed tomography angiogram (CTA) grade predicts unresectability and margin status for pancreaticobiliary neoplasms.

Tara S Kent1, Vassilios Raptopoulos, Mark P Callery, Shiva Gautam, Charles M Vollmer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The Raptopoulos computed tomography (CT) grading system of pancreaticobiliary cancers was conceived to predict resectability based on tumour involvement of critical vasculature. The aim of the present study was to investigate the relationship between CT grade, resectability, margin status and survival after pancreatic resection.
METHODS: Patients with presumed pancreaticobiliary malignancy and a pancreas protocol computed tomography angiogram (CTA) who underwent attempted curative resection from October 2001 and August 2008 were identified. The relationship between radiographical involvement of critical vasculature, according to a five-point scale, and ultimate resectability, margin status and survival was assessed.
RESULTS: Overall, 276 (70.2%) out of 393 patients were resectable. The proportion of patients who were unresectable at laparotomy increased as CT grade escalated; 41/250 (16.4%) CT Grade 0, 16/55 (29.1%) CT Grade 1, 33/55 (60%) CT Grade 2, 27/33 CT Grade 3, P < 0.001. Local invasion or vascular involvement was the reason for unresectability in 14/41, 12/16, 23/33, 16/27 patients with CT Grade 0-3, respectively. A R0 resection was achieved in 84/131 patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma and varied significantly by CT grade, P= 0.021. Significant predictors of survival were age (P < 0.0001), resectability (P < 0.0001) and diagnosis (P < 0.009).
CONCLUSIONS: Escalating Raptopoulos CT grade is correlated with increasing probability of unresectability and R1 resection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20495655      PMCID: PMC2826669          DOI: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2009.00145.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HPB (Oxford)        ISSN: 1365-182X            Impact factor:   3.647


  30 in total

1.  Pretreatment assessment of resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: expert consensus statement.

Authors:  Mark P Callery; Kenneth J Chang; Elliot K Fishman; Mark S Talamonti; L William Traverso; David C Linehan
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-04-24       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Diagnostic laparoscopy for periampullary and pancreatic cancer: what is the true benefit?

Authors:  Christopher J Barreiro; Keith D Lillemoe; Leonidas G Koniaris; Taylor A Sohn; Charles J Yeo; JoAnn Coleman; Elliot K Fishman; John L Cameron
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Pancreaticoduodenectomy with vascular resection: margin status and survival duration.

Authors:  Jennifer F Tseng; Chandrajit P Raut; Jeffrey E Lee; Peter W T Pisters; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Eddie K Abdalla; Henry F Gomez; Charlotte C Sun; Christopher H Crane; Robert A Wolff; Douglas B Evans
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  The use of helical CT and CT angiography to predict vascular involvement from pancreatic cancer: correlation with findings at surgery.

Authors:  V Raptopoulos; M L Steer; R G Sheiman; T G Vrachliotis; C A Gougoutas; J S Movson
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Is CT angiography sufficient for prediction of resectability of periampullary neoplasms?

Authors:  P F Saldinger; M Reilly; K Reynolds; V Raptopoulos; R Chuttani; M L Steer; J B Matthews
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2000 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Staging of pancreatic head adenocarcinoma with spiral CT and endoscopic ultrasonography: an indirect evaluation of the usefulness of laparoscopy.

Authors:  Frédérique Maire; Alain Sauvanet; Florence Trivin; Pascal Hammel; Dermot O'Toole; Laurent Palazzo; Valérie Vilgrain; Jacques Belghiti; Philippe Ruszniewski; Philippe Levy
Journal:  Pancreatology       Date:  2004-07-06       Impact factor: 3.996

7.  Detection of small pancreatic tumors with multiphasic helical CT.

Authors:  Yulia Lisenko Bronstein; Evelyne M Loyer; Harmeet Kaur; Haesun Choi; Cynthia David; Ronelle A DuBrow; Lyle D Broemeling; Karen R Cleary; Chusilp Charnsangavej
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  [Is pancreatectomy with resection of the retro-pancreatic vessels for cancer justified?].

Authors:  J Baulieux; M Adham; E Oussoultzoglou; E De la Roche; N Berthoux; O Bourdeix; C Ducerf
Journal:  Chirurgie       Date:  1998-11

9.  Predicting resectability of periampullary cancer with three-dimensional computed tomography.

Authors:  Michael G House; Charles J Yeo; John L Cameron; Kurt A Campbell; Richard D Schulick; Steven D Leach; Ralph H Hruban; Karen M Horton; Elliot K Fishman; Keith D Lillemoe
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey.

Authors:  Daniel Dindo; Nicolas Demartines; Pierre-Alain Clavien
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Multimodality imaging of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Shailesh V Shrikhande; Savio George Barreto; Mahesh Goel; Supreeta Arya
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 3.647

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.