Literature DB >> 20495594

Methadone: does stigma play a role as a barrier to treatment of chronic pain?

Shalini Shah1, Sudhir Diwan.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The synthetic opioid methadone is a promising analgesic for the management of chronic neuropathic pain. Methadone therapy is increasing as its advantages are being realized over other opioids. Methadone's lack of known active metabolites, high oral bioavailability, low cost, and its additional receptor activity as an antagonist of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors make it an attractive analgesic.
METHODS: We surveyed 550 pain physicians to determine their prescribing practices of methadone. The study was approved by our Institutional Review Board. A list of 550 pain physicians, which included practitioners in private practice, university settings, and community hospitals, were obtained and surveys sent via mail. The list was obtained through the American Pain Society's membership list. Out of 550 surveys sent, 124 replies were returned.
RESULTS: The 124 surveys that were returned included pain physicians from various settings: 20 responses from physicians practicing at a university setting, 16 responses from a community setting, 54 responses from a private setting, one from university and community settings, 7 from community and private settings, 3 from university and community and private settings; 23 did not specify. Of the 124 physicians, 111 prescribe methadone in their pain practice. Of the 13 physicians who do not prescribe methadone, the main reason for not using the drug for 5 physicians was because of social stigma, 2 because of minimal experience with the drug, 2 because the drug was not effective, one because of lack of knowledge, and one because of potential adverse effects. Of the 111 physicians who use methadone, 55 stated that social stigma was the most common reason patients refuse to take methadone for the treatment of pain, 44 because of adverse effects, and 5 stated "other" as the reason patients refuse to take methadone. Of 111 physicians who prescribe methadone, 100 prescribed it for neuropathic pain, 101 for somatic pain, 80 for visceral pain, 78 for cancer pain, and 34 for sickle cell pain. Also, 21 stated that methadone was the primary opioid they prescribed. Of the 111 physicians who prescribe methadone, 86 start methadone at low dose and titrate up to minimize side effects. Fourteen clinicians load methadone and titrate down to minimize adverse effects while maintaining analgesia.
CONCLUSION: The majority of survey responders (90%) prescribed methadone in their pain practice, but on a very limited basis; 59% state <20% of their patients are on methadone. Three times a day dosing schedule was the most typical regimen (57%) while 77% prefer to titrate up on the dosage. It seems interesting that many clinicians do not prescribe methadone as a primary analgesic. One reason for this is due to the social stigma of its use in treatment of heroin addicts. Also, a lack of widely recognized treatment algorithms or guidelines to assist clinicians with opioid conversions and maintenance might be playing a role. The role of stigma as a barrier to adequate treatment of chronic pain among pain physicians prescribing practices is a fundamental, yet unexplored issue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20495594

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain Physician        ISSN: 1533-3159            Impact factor:   4.965


  12 in total

1.  Management of chronic pain in the rheumatic diseases with insights for the clinician.

Authors:  Mary-Ann Fitzcharles; Yoram Shir
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 5.346

2.  Treating Opioid Dependence with Buprenorphine in the Safety Net: Critical Learning from Clinical Data.

Authors:  Traci R Rieckmann; Nicholas Gideonse; Amanda Risser; Jennifer E DeVoe; Amanda J Abraham
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 1.505

3.  The relationship between drug user stigma and depression among inner-city drug users in Baltimore, MD.

Authors:  Carl Latkin; Melissa Davey-Rothwell; Jing-yan Yang; Natalie Crawford
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.671

Review 4.  Emerging Challenges to the Safe and Effective Use of Methadone for Cancer-Related Pain in Paediatric and Adult Patient Populations.

Authors:  Kyle P Edmonds; Ila M Saunders; Andrew Willeford; Toluwalase A Ajayi; Rabia S Atayee
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 5.  The effectiveness of interventions for reducing stigma related to substance use disorders: a systematic review.

Authors:  James D Livingston; Teresa Milne; Mei Lan Fang; Erica Amari
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 6.526

6.  The Chronic Pain Myth Scale: Development and Validation of a French-Canadian Instrument Measuring Knowledge, Beliefs, and Attitudes of People in the Community towards Chronic Pain.

Authors:  Anaïs Lacasse; Judy-Ann Connelly; Manon Choinière
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2016-09-25       Impact factor: 3.037

7.  Role of Ketamine and Methadone as Adjunctive Therapy in Complex Pain Management: A Case Report and Literature Review.

Authors:  Wasek Faisal; Judith Jacques
Journal:  Indian J Palliat Care       Date:  2017 Jan-Mar

8.  "Don't Judge a Book Its Cover": A Qualitative Study of Methadone Patients' Experiences of Stigma.

Authors:  Julia Woo; Anuja Bhalerao; Monica Bawor; Meha Bhatt; Brittany Dennis; Natalia Mouravska; Laura Zielinski; Zainab Samaan
Journal:  Subst Abuse       Date:  2017-03-23

9.  Epidemiology of chronic pain in Ukraine: Findings from the World Mental Health Survey.

Authors:  Anna Xu; Elizabeth Hilton; Riley Arkema; Nathan L Tintle; Luralyn M Helming
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Use and Perceptions of Opioids Versus Marijuana among Cancer Survivors.

Authors:  Jessica M Potts; Betelihem Getachew; Milkie Vu; Eric Nehl; Katherine A Yeager; Corinne R Leach; Carla J Berg
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2022-02       Impact factor: 2.037

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.