Literature DB >> 20495528

Low-stress route learning using the Lashley III maze in mice.

Amanda Bressler1, David Blizard, Anne Andrews.   

Abstract

Many behavior tests designed to assess learning and memory in rodents, particularly mice, rely on visual cues, food and/or water deprivation, or other aversive stimuli to motivate task acquisition. As animals age, sensory modalities deteriorate. For example, many strains of mice develop hearing deficits or cataracts. Changes in the sensory systems required to guide mice during task acquisition present potential confounds in interpreting learning changes in aging animals. Moreover, the use of aversive stimuli to motivate animals to learn tasks is potentially confounding when comparing mice with differential sensitivities to stress. To minimize these types of confounding effects, we have implemented a modified version of the Lashley III maze. This maze relies on route learning, whereby mice learn to navigate a maze via repeated exposure under low stress conditions, e.g. dark phase, no food/water deprivation, until they navigate a path from the start location to a pseudo-home cage with 0 or 1 error(s) on two consecutive trials. We classify this as a low-stress behavior test because it does not rely on aversive stimuli to encourage exploration of the maze and learning of the task. The apparatus consists of a modular start box, a 4-arm maze body, and a goal box. At the end of the goal box is a pseudo-home cage that contains bedding similar to that found in the animal's home cage and is specific to each animal for the duration of maze testing. It has been demonstrated previously that this pseudo-home cage provides sufficient reward to motivate mice to learn to navigate the maze. Here, we present the visualization of the Lashley III maze procedure in the context of evaluating age-related differences in learning and memory in mice along with a comparison of learning behavior in two different background strains of mice. We hope that other investigators interested in evaluating the effects of aging or stress vulnerability in mice will consider this maze an attractive alternative to behavioral tests that involve more stressful learning tasks and/or visual cues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20495528      PMCID: PMC3284847          DOI: 10.3791/1786

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis Exp        ISSN: 1940-087X            Impact factor:   1.355


  7 in total

1.  Individual differences in the expression of a "general" learning ability in mice.

Authors:  Louis D Matzel; Yu Ray Han; Henya Grossman; Meghana S Karnik; Dave Patel; Nicholas Scott; Steven M Specht; Chetan C Gandhi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-07-23       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  The use of the Morris Water Maze in the study of memory and learning.

Authors:  R Brandeis; Y Brandys; S Yehuda
Journal:  Int J Neurosci       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 2.292

3.  'Return to home cage' as a reward for maze learning in young and old genetically heterogeneous mice.

Authors:  David A Blizard; Viola K Weinheimer; Laura Cousino Klein; Stephen A Petrill; Rachel Cohen; Gerald E McClearn
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 0.982

4.  Appetitive learning by old mice.

Authors:  J M Warren
Journal:  Exp Aging Res       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.645

5.  Memory deficits associated with senescence: a neurophysiological and behavioral study in the rat.

Authors:  C A Barnes
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1979-02

6.  Memory impairments following basal forebrain lesions.

Authors:  D J Hepler; G L Wenk; B L Cribbs; D S Olton; J T Coyle
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1985-10-28       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  A novel mouse-friendly cognitive task suitable for use in aging studies.

Authors:  David A Blizard; Laura Cousino Klein; Rachel Cohen; Gerald E McClearn
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.805

  7 in total
  6 in total

1.  Repopulated microglia induce expression of Cxcl13 with differential changes in Tau phosphorylation but do not impact amyloid pathology.

Authors:  Berke Karaahmet; Linh Le; Monique S Mendes; Ania K Majewska; M Kerry O'Banion
Journal:  J Neuroinflammation       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 9.587

2.  There's no place like home? Return to the home cage triggers dopamine release in the mouse nucleus accumbens.

Authors:  Felix P Mayer; Hideki Iwamoto; Maureen K Hahn; Gregory J Grumbar; Adele Stewart; Yulong Li; Randy D Blakely
Journal:  Neurochem Int       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 3.921

3.  Kv4.2 knockout mice display learning and memory deficits in the Lashley maze.

Authors:  Gregory D Smith; Nan Gao; Joaquin N Lugo
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2016-10-05

4.  Post-transcriptional regulation of mouse neurogenesis by Pumilio proteins.

Authors:  Meng Zhang; Dong Chen; Jing Xia; Wenqi Han; Xiekui Cui; Nils Neuenkirchen; Gretchen Hermes; Nenad Sestan; Haifan Lin
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 11.361

5.  Loss of CB1 receptors leads to differential age-related changes in reward-driven learning and memory.

Authors:  Onder Albayram; Andras Bilkei-Gorzo; Andreas Zimmer
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 5.750

6.  Role of mitochondrial uncoupling protein-2 (UCP2) in higher brain functions, neuronal plasticity and network oscillation.

Authors:  Gretchen Hermes; David Nagy; Michael Waterson; Attila Zsarnovszky; Luis Varela; Mihaly Hajos; Tamas L Horvath
Journal:  Mol Metab       Date:  2016-04-09       Impact factor: 7.422

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.