Literature DB >> 2049512

Multiple comparisons for analyzing dichotomous response.

W W Piegorsch1.   

Abstract

Dichotomous response models are common in many experimental settings. Statistical parameters of interest are typically the probabilities, pi, that an experimental unit will respond at the various treatment levels. Herein, simultaneous procedures are considered for multiple comparisons among these probabilities, with attention directed at construction of simultaneous confidence intervals for various functions of the pi. The inferences are based on the asymptotic normality of the maximum likelihood estimator of pi. Specific applications include all pairwise comparisons and comparisons with a fixed (control) treatment. Monte Carlo evaluations are undertaken to examine the small-sample properties of the various procedures. It is seen that use of the usual estimates of variance consistently leads to less-than-nominal empirical coverage for most sample sizes examined. For very large samples (total size greater than about 300), nominal coverage is achieved. A reformulation of the pairwise comparisons using a construction noted by Beal (1987, Biometrics 43, 941-950) is shown to exhibit generally nominal empirical coverage characteristics, and is recommended for use with small-to-moderate sample sizes.

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2049512

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  3 in total

1.  Simultaneous confidence interval construction for many-to-one comparisons of proportion differences based on correlated paired data.

Authors:  Zhengyu Yang; Guo-Liang Tian; Xiaobin Liu; Chang-Xing Ma
Journal:  J Appl Stat       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 1.416

2.  Effectiveness of home blood pressure monitoring, Web communication, and pharmacist care on hypertension control: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Beverly B Green; Andrea J Cook; James D Ralston; Paul A Fishman; Sheryl L Catz; James Carlson; David Carrell; Lynda Tyll; Eric B Larson; Robert S Thompson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-06-25       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Multiple comparisons in long-term toxicity studies.

Authors:  L Hothorn
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 9.031

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.