Literature DB >> 20494989

Comparative analysis of sequence periodicity among prokaryotic genomes points to differences in nucleoid structure and a relationship to gene expression.

Jan Mrázek1.   

Abstract

Regular spacing of short runs of A or T nucleotides in DNA sequences with a period close to the helical period of the DNA double helix has been associated with intrinsic DNA bending and nucleosome positioning in eukaryotes. Analogous periodic signals were also observed in prokaryotic genomes. While the exact role of this periodicity in prokaryotes is not known, it has been proposed to facilitate the DNA packaging in the prokaryotic nucleoid and/or to promote negative or positive supercoiling. We developed a methodology for assessments of intragenomic heterogeneity of these periodic patterns and applied it in analysis of 1,025 prokaryotic chromosomes. This technique allows more detailed analysis of sequence periodicity than previous methods where sequence periodicity was assessed in an integral form across the whole chromosome. We found that most genomes have the periodic signal confined to several chromosomal segments while most of the chromosome lacks a strong sequence periodicity. Moreover, there are significant differences among different prokaryotes in both the intensity and persistency of sequence periodicity related to DNA curvature. We proffer that the prokaryotic nucleoid consists of relatively rigid sections stabilized by short intrinsically bent DNA segments and characterized by locally strong periodic patterns alternating with regions featuring a weak periodic signal, which presumably permits higher structural flexibility. This model applies to most bacteria and archaea. In genomes with an exceptionally persistent periodic signal, highly expressed genes tend to concentrate in aperiodic sections, suggesting that structural heterogeneity of the nucleoid is related to local differences in transcriptional activity.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20494989      PMCID: PMC2897355          DOI: 10.1128/JB.00149-10

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bacteriol        ISSN: 0021-9193            Impact factor:   3.490


  39 in total

1.  Genomes OnLine Database (GOLD): a monitor of genome projects world-wide.

Authors:  A Bernal; U Ear; N Kyrpides
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2001-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Predicted highly expressed genes of diverse prokaryotic genomes.

Authors:  S Karlin; J Mrázek
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.490

3.  Ecologic genomics of DNA: upstream bending in prokaryotic promoters.

Authors:  A Bolshoy; E Nevo
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  Gene essentiality determines chromosome organisation in bacteria.

Authors:  Eduardo P C Rocha; Antoine Danchin
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-11-15       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 5.  Gene organization: selection, selfishness, and serendipity.

Authors:  Jeffrey G Lawrence
Journal:  Annu Rev Microbiol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 15.500

Review 6.  What positions nucleosomes?--A model.

Authors:  Ryoiti Kiyama; Edward N Trifonov
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2002-07-17       Impact factor: 4.124

7.  Structural analysis of DNA sequence: evidence for lateral gene transfer in Thermotoga maritima.

Authors:  P Worning; L J Jensen; K E Nelson; S Brunak; D W Ussery
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-02-01       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Predicted highly expressed and putative alien genes of Deinococcus radiodurans and implications for resistance to ionizing radiation damage.

Authors:  S Karlin; J Mrazek
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-04-10       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Partitioning the C. elegans genome by nucleosome modification, occupancy, and positioning.

Authors:  Sam Guoping Gu; Andrew Fire
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2009-08-25       Impact factor: 4.316

10.  Periodicities of 10-11bp as indicators of the supercoiled state of genomic DNA.

Authors:  Patrick Schieg; Hanspeter Herzel
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2004-10-29       Impact factor: 5.469

View more
  9 in total

1.  The structural code of cyanobacterial genomes.

Authors:  Robert Lehmann; Rainer Machné; Hanspeter Herzel
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Analysis of distribution and significance of simple sequence repeats in enteric bacteria Shigella dysenteriae SD197.

Authors:  Batwal Saurabh; Sitaraman Sneha; Ranade Suvidya; Khandekar Pramod; Bajaj Shailesh
Journal:  Bioinformation       Date:  2011-07-19

3.  Metabolic engineering of Escherichia coli into a versatile glycosylation platform: production of bio-active quercetin glycosides.

Authors:  Frederik De Bruyn; Maarten Van Brempt; Jo Maertens; Wouter Van Bellegem; Dries Duchi; Marjan De Mey
Journal:  Microb Cell Fact       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 5.328

4.  Assessing diversity of DNA structure-related sequence features in prokaryotic genomes.

Authors:  Yongjie Huang; Jan Mrázek
Journal:  DNA Res       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 4.458

5.  Genome-wide analysis of DNA uptake across the outer membrane of naturally competent Haemophilus influenzae.

Authors:  Marcelo Mora; Joshua Chang Mell; Garth D Ehrlich; Rachel L Ehrlich; Rosemary J Redfield
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2020-12-30

6.  Differences in DNA curvature-related sequence periodicity between prokaryotic chromosomes and phages, and relationship to chromosomal prophage content.

Authors:  Jacob Abel; Jan Mrázek
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 3.969

7.  PerPlot & PerScan: tools for analysis of DNA curvature-related periodicity in genomic nucleotide sequences.

Authors:  Jan Mrázek; Tejas Chaudhari; Aryabrata Basu
Journal:  Microb Inform Exp       Date:  2011-11-28

8.  Investigating the interplay between nucleoid-associated proteins, DNA curvature, and CRISPR elements using comparative genomics.

Authors:  Hao Tong; Jan Mrázek
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-03       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Selection for ancient periodic motifs that do not impart DNA bending.

Authors:  Aletheia Atzinger; Jeffrey G Lawrence
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 5.917

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.