Literature DB >> 20494867

Multiple goal management starts with attention: goal prioritizing affects the allocation of spatial attention to goal-relevant events.

Julia Vogt1, Jan De Houwer, Geert Crombez.   

Abstract

Prior studies have shown that attention is allocated to events relevant to the current goal of a person. Until now, research has focused on the implementation of a single goal leaving open the question of how attention is allocated when multiple goals are activated. We examined whether the allocation of spatial attention is affected by the prioritizing of one goal over another. The results of two dot probe studies showed that attention is oriented to stimuli relevant to a goal with high value when simultaneously presented with stimuli relevant to a goal with low value (Experiment 1) and to stimuli relevant to a goal with high expectancy of success that were simultaneously presented with stimuli relevant to a goal with low expectancy of success (Experiment 2). These findings demonstrate that the allocation of spatial attention is dependent on the motivational strength of goal pursuit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 20494867     DOI: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000066

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Psychol        ISSN: 1618-3169


  4 in total

1.  Try to look on the bright side: Children and adults can (sometimes) override their tendency to prioritize negative faces.

Authors:  Kristin Hansen Lagattuta; Hannah J Kramer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2017-01

2.  When does hearing laughter draw attention to happy faces? Task relevance determines the influence of a crossmodal affective context on emotional attention.

Authors:  Pieter Van Dessel; Julia Vogt
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 3.  The impact of affective information on working memory: A pair of meta-analytic reviews of behavioral and neuroimaging evidence.

Authors:  Susanne Schweizer; Ajay B Satpute; Shir Atzil; Andy P Field; Caitlin Hitchcock; Melissa Black; Lisa Feldman Barrett; Tim Dalgleish
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 17.737

4.  Now you see it, now you don't: Relevance of threat enhances social anxiety-linked attentional bias to angry faces, but relevance of neutral information attenuates it.

Authors:  Julia Vogt; Helen F Dodd; Alice Parker; Francesca Duffield; Michiko Sakaki
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 3.752

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.