Literature DB >> 20494019

Lymph node evaluation in video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy versus lobectomy by thoracotomy.

Chadrick E Denlinger1, Felix Fernandez, Bryan F Meyers, Wande Pratt, Jennifer Bell Zoole, G Alexander Patterson, A Sasha Krupnick, Daniel Kreisel, Traves Crabtree.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: With the emergence of video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lobectomy, concern remains regarding the adequacy of nodal assessment versus thoracotomy.
METHODS: All clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with VATS or open lobectomy were retrospectively evaluated. Total nodes, N2 nodes, and nodes at each station were evaluated for associations with surgery type and location of involved lobe.
RESULTS: There were 79 VATS and 464 open lobectomy or segmental resections for stage I tumors. Overall, fewer lymph nodes were sampled with VATS compared with thoracotomy (7.4 +/- 0.6 vs 8.9 +/- 0.2, respectively; p = 0.029), and fewer N2 nodes were sampled with VATS versus thoracotomy as well (2.5 +/- 3.0 vs 3.7 +/- 3.3, p = 0.004). There were no differences in N1 node sampling between the two groups (5.2 +/- 3.6 vs 4.9 +/- 4.2, p = 0.592). Furthermore, there were more station 7 nodes with thoracotomy versus VATS (1.2 +/- 0.1 vs 0.6 +/- 0.1, p = 0.002). Among right-sided lesions, there was no difference in 4R nodes between groups (1.4 +/- 0.4 vs 1.6 +/- 0.2, p = 0.7) although there was a trend toward more level 7 nodes with thoracotomy (1.0 +/- 0.2 vs 1.4 +/- 0.2, p < 0.08). Among left-sided resections there were more station 7 nodes with thoracotomy versus VATS (1.0 +/- 0.1 vs 0.4 +/- 0.1, p < 0.001) and more station 5/6 nodes (1.1 +/- 0.1 vs 0.5 +/- 0.1, p < 0.04). For upper lobe resections, the total nodes (8.9 +/- 0.3 vs 7.4 +/- 0.7, p = 0.05) and station 7 nodes (1.0 +/- 0.1 vs 0.6 +/- 0.1, p < 0.01) were higher with thoracotomy than VATS. There was no difference in 2-year survival between groups (81% vs 83%, p = 0.4).
CONCLUSIONS: Our early experience with VATS has been associated with fewer lymph nodes sampled compared with open lobectomy although there was no survival difference. Analysis of these differences has directed us toward a more focused lymph node sampling with VATS lobectomy. 2010 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20494019     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.02.094

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  42 in total

Review 1.  Video-assisted thoracic surgery for lung cancer.

Authors:  Sanghoon Jheon; Hee Chul Yang; Sukki Cho
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2012-03-28

2.  VATS lobectomy lymph node management.

Authors:  Gavin M Wright
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2012-05

3.  Efficacy of mediastinal lymph node dissection during thoracoscopic lobectomy.

Authors:  Hanghang Wang; Thomas A D'Amico
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2012-05

4.  VATS right upper lobectomy.

Authors:  Gan-Jun Kang; Wen-Yang Jiang; Song-Ping Xie; Jie Huang
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  Comparative study of systematic thoracoscopic lymphadenectomy and conventional thoracotomy in resectable non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Wei Wang; Weiqiang Yin; Wenlong Shao; Gening Jiang; Qun Wang; Lunxu Liu; Deruo Liu; Zheng Wang; Zhihua Zhu; Hanzhang Chen; Jianxing He
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  Surgical Outcome of Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery vs. Thoracotomy for Primary Lung Cancer >5 cm in Diameter.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Nakano; Shunsuke Endo; Tetsuya Endo; Shinichi Otani; Hiroyoshi Tsubochi; Shinichi Yamamoto; Kenji Tetsuka
Journal:  Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2015-05-25       Impact factor: 1.520

Review 7.  Minimally invasive pulmonary surgery for lung cancer, up to date.

Authors:  Hisashi Iwata
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2013-05-11

8.  Can lymph node evaluation be performed well by video-assisted thoracic surgery?

Authors:  Zhenrong Zhang; Hongxiang Feng; Xiaowei Wang; Chaoyang Liang; Deruo Liu
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-08-02       Impact factor: 4.553

9.  Nodal upstaging evaluation in NSCLC patients treated by robotic lobectomy.

Authors:  Carmelina Zirafa; Vittorio Aprile; Sara Ricciardi; Gaetano Romano; Federico Davini; Ilenia Cavaliere; Greta Alì; Gabriella Fontanini; Franca Melfi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Reasons not to perform uniportal VATS lobectomy.

Authors:  Alan D L Sihoe
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.895

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.