Literature DB >> 20493632

The efficacy and safety of pregabalin in the treatment of neuropathic pain associated with chronic lumbosacral radiculopathy.

Ralf Baron1, Rainer Freynhagen, Thomas R Tölle, Christian Cloutier, Teresa Leon, T Kevin Murphy, Kem Phillips.   

Abstract

We evaluated the efficacy of pregabalin in patients with chronic lumbosacral radiculopathy. This randomized, controlled, withdrawal trial included five phases: screening (4-18 days); run-in (4-10 days) to screen out placebo responders; single-blind (28 days) to identify pregabalin responders; double-blind to randomize responders to pregabalin or placebo (35 days); and final study medication taper (7 days). The primary endpoint was time to loss of response (LOR) during the double-blind phase (1-point increase in pain, discontinuation, or rescue-medication use). In the single-blind phase, 58% of patients had 30% pain reduction. In the double-blind phase, pregabalin (n=110) and placebo (n=107) groups did not differ significantly in time to LOR. Adverse events caused the discontinuation of 9.9% and 5.6% of pregabalin-treated and placebo-treated patients, respectively. Most patients with chronic lumbosacral radiculopathy responded to pregabalin therapy; however, time to LOR did not significantly differ between pregabalin and placebo. Considering the results of all phases of the study, it is difficult to draw definitive conclusions from it, suggesting a need for further work to understand the clinical potential of pregabalin treatment for lumbosacral radiculopathy. Copyright (c) 2010 International Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20493632     DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.04.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  35 in total

1.  Failed back surgery syndrome: a suggested algorithm of care.

Authors:  Praveen Ganty; Manohar Sharma
Journal:  Br J Pain       Date:  2012-11

Review 2.  The Challenges of Treating Sciatica Pain in Older Adults.

Authors:  Manuela L Ferreira; Andrew McLachlan
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 3.  Pregabalin: latest safety evidence and clinical implications for the management of neuropathic pain.

Authors:  Cory Toth
Journal:  Ther Adv Drug Saf       Date:  2014-02

Review 4.  Conservative treatments for lumbar radicular pain.

Authors:  Gregory Fleury; Michael J Nissen; Stéphane Genevay
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2014-10

5.  Anticonvulsants in the treatment of low back pain and lumbar radicular pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Oliver Enke; Heather A New; Charles H New; Stephanie Mathieson; Andrew J McLachlan; Jane Latimer; Christopher G Maher; C-W Christine Lin
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Pain catastrophizing predicts poor response to topical analgesics in patients with neuropathic pain.

Authors:  Tsipora Mankovsky; Mary Lynch; Aj Clark; Jana Sawynok; Michael Jl Sullivan
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.037

7.  Pregabalin for Neuropathic Pain: Why Benefits Could Be Expected for Multiple Pain Conditions.

Authors:  Setsuro Ogawa; Akio Arakawa; Kazuhiro Hayakawa; Tamotsu Yoshiyama
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 2.859

8.  Adding pregabalin or gabapentin for the management of community-treated patients with painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy: a comparative cost analysis.

Authors:  Antoni Sicras; Javier Rejas; Ruth Navarro; Albert Planas
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.859

9.  Evidence for the BUAS-test ability to diagnose lumbar radicular pain.

Authors:  Boaz Gedaliahu Samolsky Dekel; Maria Cristina Sorella; Alessio Vasarri; Rita Maria Melotti
Journal:  Br J Pain       Date:  2021-04-12

10.  Axial low back pain: one painful area--many perceptions and mechanisms.

Authors:  Matti Förster; Friederike Mahn; Ulrich Gockel; Mathias Brosz; Rainer Freynhagen; Thomas R Tölle; Ralf Baron
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.