Literature DB >> 20493571

Within-flock variations of Campylobacter loads in caeca and on carcasses from broilers.

Ingrid Hansson1, Ninni Pudas, Boel Harbom, Eva Olsson Engvall.   

Abstract

The proportions of broiler caeca and carcass rinse samples positive for Campylobacter spp. within broiler flocks were determined. Twenty intact caeca per flock from 27 flocks were analyzed individually. Rinse samples were obtained from 5 to 25 carcasses from 27 other flocks. In total, 540 caecum samples and 445 carcass rinse samples were analyzed. The proportion of positive caeca within flocks ranged from 10 to 100%, and the proportion of positive carcasses ranged from 85 to 100%. The highest and lowest numbers of Campylobacter spp. found in positive caecum samples were 8.6 and 1.7log cfu/g caecal contents, respectively. The number of Campylobacter spp. in the caeca from individual broilers within a flock varied by up to 6.3log cfu/g caecal contents. The highest number found on one carcass was 4.2log cfu/ml carcass rinse sample, and the within-flock variation in Campylobacter spp. was up to 3.2log cfu/ml rinse sample. There was thus great variation in the load of Campylobacter spp. in individual caecum and carcass samples obtained from each positive broiler flock. This large variation in the numbers of Campylobacter spp. carried by individual birds should be considered when only one or a few samples are collected from a flock and the results are used for risk assessments. 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20493571     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.04.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol        ISSN: 0168-1605            Impact factor:   5.277


  13 in total

1.  Management Strategies for Prevention of Campylobacter Infections Through the Poultry Food Chain: A European Perspective.

Authors:  Thomas Alter; Felix Reich
Journal:  Curr Top Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 4.291

2.  Influence of process parameter on Campylobacter spp. counts on poultry meat in a slaughterhouse environment.

Authors:  Y Lehner; F Reich; G Klein
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 2.188

3.  Impact of DNA Prime/Protein Boost Vaccination against Campylobacter jejuni on Immune Responses and Gut Microbiota in Chickens.

Authors:  Noémie Gloanec; Daniel Dory; Ségolène Quesne; Véronique Béven; Typhaine Poezevara; Alassane Keita; Marianne Chemaly; Muriel Guyard-Nicodème
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-20

4.  Intestinal colonization of broiler chickens by Campylobacter spp. in an experimental infection study.

Authors:  S Bahrndorff; A B Garcia; H Vigre; M Nauta; P M H Heegaard; M Madsen; J Hoorfar; B Hald
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 4.434

Review 5.  Recent Advances in Screening of Anti-Campylobacter Activity in Probiotics for Use in Poultry.

Authors:  Manuel J Saint-Cyr; Muriel Guyard-Nicodème; Soumaya Messaoudi; Marianne Chemaly; Jean-Michel Cappelier; Xavier Dousset; Nabila Haddad
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 5.640

6.  Campylobacter growth rates in four different matrices: broiler caecal material, live birds, Bolton broth, and brain heart infusion broth.

Authors:  Tara Battersby; Desmond Walsh; Paul Whyte; Declan J Bolton
Journal:  Infect Ecol Epidemiol       Date:  2016-04-05

7.  Effect of Feed Additives on Productivity and Campylobacter spp. Loads in Broilers Reared under Free Range Conditions.

Authors:  Muriel Guyard-Nicodème; Adeline Huneau-Salaün; Fabrizio A Tatone; Fabien Skiba; Maxime Quentin; Ségolène Quesne; Typhaine Poezevara; Marianne Chemaly
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 5.640

8.  Infection Dynamics and Antimicrobial Resistance Profile of Salmonella Paratyphi B d-tartrate Positive (Java) in a Persistently Infected Broiler Barn.

Authors:  Franziska Kloska; Martin Beyerbach; Günter Klein
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-01-21       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Identification of Transmission Routes of Campylobacter and On-Farm Measures to Reduce Campylobacter in Chicken.

Authors:  Sara Frosth; Oskar Karlsson-Lindsjö; Adnan Niazi; Lise-Lotte Fernström; Ingrid Hansson
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2020-05-09

10.  Chlorine Induces Physiological and Morphological Changes on Chicken Meat Campylobacter Isolates.

Authors:  Gayani Kuriyawe Muhandiramlage; Andrea R McWhorter; Kapil K Chousalkar
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 5.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.