Literature DB >> 20493530

Ultrasound biomicroscopic configurations of the anterior ocular segment in a population-based study the Kumejima Study.

Ichiko Medoruma Henzan1, Atsuo Tomidokoro, Chiharu Uejo, Hiroshi Sakai, Shoichi Sawaguchi, Aiko Iwase, Makoto Araie.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To characterize quantitatively the configuration of the anterior ocular segment with ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) in a population-based setting.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: Ten percent of 4632 residents aged > or =40 years of Kumejima, an island off southwest Japan, were randomly selected.
METHODS: We performed UBM under light and dark conditions in the 4 quadrants of the right eyes. The anatomic landmarks on the anterior ocular segment UBM images were identified by 1 examiner to quantify the peripheral anterior chamber depth (ACD), location of the ciliary body, and iris thickness. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Angle-opening distance at 250 and 500 microm from the scleral spur (AOD250, AOD500), trabecular-iris angle (TIA), trabecular-ciliary process distance (TCPD), thickness of the iris (ID), trabecular-anterior iris surface angle (TAIA), trabecular-posterior iris surface angle (TPIA), trabecular-ciliary angle (TCA), and thickness of iris measured at 1000, 2000, and 3000 microm (IT1000, IT2000 and IT3000).
RESULTS: The AOD500 averaged 0.267+/-0.138 (mean +/- standard deviation) and 0.202+/-0.116 mm under light and dark conditions, respectively; TIA 22.2+/-10.0 and 17.0+/-8.9 degrees; TCPD 0.755+/-0.165 and 0.748+/-0.152 mm; and ID 0.412+/-0.053 and 0.457+/-0.062 mm. The peripheral ACD was deepest temporally, then nasally, then inferiorly, and then superiorly (P<0.05, post hoc test). The position of the ciliary body was deepest nasally, then temporally, then inferiorly, and then superiorly (P<0.05). Iris thickness did not differ significantly among the quadrants. Older subjects had a shallower peripheral ACD, more anteriorly located ciliary body, and thinner iris (analysis of covariance, P<0.015). The peripheral ACD was deeper and the ciliary body was located more deeply in men than women (P<0.05), although no intergender differences in iris thickness were seen (P>0.1). Hyperopia, short axial length, and shallow central ACD were significantly correlated with shallower peripheral ACD, anteriorly located ciliary body, and thinner iris (P<0.05). Elevated intraocular pressure was associated with a shallow peripheral ACD (P< or =0.043).
CONCLUSIONS: There are significant associations of the peripheral ACD, location of the ciliary body, and iris thickness with age, gender, refractive error, axial length, and intraocular pressure.
Copyright © 2010 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20493530     DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.01.045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  13 in total

1.  The effect of internal fixation lamp on anterior chamber angle width measured by anterior segment optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Sakari Nakamine; Hiroshi Sakai; Yoshikuni Arakaki; Michiko Yonahara; Tadayoshi Kaiya
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 2.447

2.  Characteristics of the Ciliary Body in Healthy Chinese Subjects Evaluated by Radial and Transverse Imaging of Ultrasound Biometric Microscopy.

Authors:  Jiawei Ren; Xinbo Gao; Liming Chen; Huishan Lin; Yao Liu; Yuying Zhou; Yunru Liao; Chunzi Xie; Chengguo Zuo; Mingkai Lin
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 4.964

3.  Distribution of anterior chamber angle measurements in South African young adults: an optical coherence tomography study.

Authors:  Nishanee Rampersad; Rekha Hansraj
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 2.029

4.  Does anisometropia affect the ciliary muscle thickness? An ultrasound biomicroscopy study.

Authors:  Selim Cevher; Tayfun Şahin
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 2.031

5.  Optimal number and orientation of anterior segment OCT images to measure ocular biometric parameters in angle closure eyes: the Chinese American Eye Study.

Authors:  Jing Shan; Anmol Pardeshi; Xuejuan Jiang; Grace M Richter; Roberta McKean-Cowdin; Rohit Varma; Benjamin Y Xu
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 5.908

6.  Differences between fellow eyes of acute and chronic primary angle closure (glaucoma): An ultrasound biomicroscopy quantitative study.

Authors:  Mengwei Li; Yuhong Chen; Xiaoxiao Chen; Wenqing Zhu; Xueli Chen; Xiaolei Wang; Yuan Fang; Xiangmei Kong; Yi Dai; Junyi Chen; Xinghuai Sun
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Transscleral cyclophotocoagulation followed by cataract surgery: a novel protocol to treat refractory acute primary angle closure.

Authors:  Wei Liu; Luning Qin; Chenjia Xu; Dandan Huang; Ruru Guo; Jian Ji; Nomdo M Jansonius
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 2.209

Review 8.  Ultrasound biomicroscopy in glaucoma assessment.

Authors:  Vasile Potop; Valeria Coviltir; Speranţa Schmitzer; Christiana Diana Maria Dragosloveanu; Cătălina Ioana Ionescu; Miruna Gabriela Burcel; Maria Cristina Corbu; Dana Margareta Cornelia Dăscălescu
Journal:  Rom J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021 Apr-Jun

9.  Effect of Phacoemulsification on Anterior Chamber Angle in Eyes with Medically Uncontrolled Filtered Primary Angle-Closure Glaucoma.

Authors:  Chengguo Zuo; Bing Long; Xinxing Guo; Liming Chen; Xing Liu
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 1.909

10.  Ultrasound Biomicroscopy Measurements of the Normal Thickness for the Ciliary Body and the Iris in a Middle East Population.

Authors:  Yacoub A Yousef; Mona Mohammad; Ibrahim AlNawaiseh; Reem AlJabari; Mario Damiano Toro; Almutez Gharaibeh; Robert Rejdak; Katarzyna Nowomiejska; Sandrine Zweifel; Teresio Avitabile; Magdalena Rejdak; Rashed Nazzal
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-01-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.