Literature DB >> 20492150

Comparison of 3 spectrophotometric methods for carotenoid determination in frequently consumed fruits and vegetables.

Eric Biehler1, Frédéric Mayer, Lucien Hoffmann, Elmar Krause, Torsten Bohn.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Carotenoids are C-40 tetraterpenoid compounds with potential health beneficial effects. Major dietary sources include a variety of fruits and vegetables. Rapid screening methods are therefore desired, but their accuracy varies depending on the carotenoid profile and the matrix of the plant food. In the present study, 3 different methods were compared, all based on a rapid extraction protocol and spectrophotometric measurements to determine the total amount carotenoids present in fruits and vegetables (n = 28), either with or without chlorophyll. Published methods (a) Lichtenthaler and (b) Hornero-Méndez and Mínguez-Mosquera were compared with a newly developed method (method c) based on the average molar absorption coefficient (135310 Lcm(-1)mol(-1)) and wavelength (450 nm in acetone), for the 5 predominant carotenoid species (beta-carotene, zeaxanthin, lycopene, lutein, beta-cryptoxanthin) in the investigated foods. All results were compared to HPLC (method d). To avoid overestimating carotenoid concentrations due to chlorophyll A and B presence, the effect of saponification was studied for all methods. Overall, saponification led to significant carotenoid losses (12.6 +/- 0.9%). Methods a, b, c, and d yielded 5.1 +/- 0.4 mg/100 g, 4.6 +/- 0.5 mg/100 g, 4.3 +/- 0.5 mg/100 g, and 4.2 +/- 0.5 mg/100 g total carotenoids, respectively, with method a leading to significant higher mean concentrations compared to all other methods (P < 0.001, Bonferroni) with methods b and c being not significantly different and highly correlated compared to HPLC (> r = 0.95). Similar results were found when stratifying for chlorophyll content and fruits compared with vegetables, however, accuracy varied for individual fruits, highlighting the limitation to use the same method for all plant foods. PRACTICAL APPLICATION: This study presents a comparison of various rapid spectrophotometric measurements to determine total carotenoid content in various fruits and vegetables and could aid in the selection of the appropriate method for individual plant foods with different carotenoid profile and matrices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20492150     DOI: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2009.01417.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Food Sci        ISSN: 0022-1147            Impact factor:   3.167


  19 in total

1.  Comparative analysis of carotenoid content in Momordica cochinchinensis (Cucurbitaceae) collected from Australia, Thailand and Vietnam.

Authors:  Dilani Wimalasiri; Robert Brkljača; Terrence J Piva; Sylvia Urban; Tien Huynh
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 2.701

2.  Influence of Cooking Conditions on Carotenoid Content and Stability in Porridges Prepared from High-Carotenoid Maize.

Authors:  Joana Díaz-Gómez; Antonio Javier Ramos; Changfu Zhu; Olga Martín-Belloso; Robert Soliva-Fortuny
Journal:  Plant Foods Hum Nutr       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.921

3.  Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Induce Tolerance to Salinity Stress in Taro Plantlets (Colocasia esculenta L. Schott) during Acclimatization.

Authors:  Obdulia Baltazar-Bernal; José Luis Spinoso-Castillo; Eucario Mancilla-Álvarez; Jericó Jabín Bello-Bello
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-05

4.  Medium development and production of carotenoids and exopolysaccharides by the extremophile Rhodothermus marinus DSM16675 in glucose-based defined media.

Authors:  Israt Jahan Mukti; Roya R R Sardari; Thordis Kristjansdottir; Gudmundur O Hreggvidsson; Eva Nordberg Karlsson
Journal:  Microb Cell Fact       Date:  2022-10-23       Impact factor: 6.352

5.  Bioactive compounds and antioxidant activity of wolfberry infusion.

Authors:  Yujing Sun; Japaer Rukeya; Wenyang Tao; Peilong Sun; Xingqian Ye
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Determination of Mineral Constituents, Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Qualities of Cleome gynandra, Compared to Brassica oleracea and Beta vulgaris.

Authors:  Mack Moyo; Stephen O Amoo; Adeyemi O Aremu; Jiri Gruz; Michaela Šubrtová; Monika Jarošová; Petr Tarkowski; Karel Doležal
Journal:  Front Chem       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 5.221

7.  Nutritional, Biophysical and Physiological Characteristics of Wild Rocket Genotypes As Affected by Soilless Cultivation System, Salinity Level of Nutrient Solution and Growing Period.

Authors:  Anna Bonasia; Corrado Lazzizera; Antonio Elia; Giulia Conversa
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 5.753

8.  In Vitro Antioxidative Evaluation of α- and β-Carotene, Isolated from Crude Palm Oil.

Authors:  Surashree Sen Gupta; Mahua Ghosh
Journal:  J Anal Methods Chem       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 2.193

9.  Tomato Fruits Show Wide Phenomic Diversity but Fruit Developmental Genes Show Low Genomic Diversity.

Authors:  Vijee Mohan; Soni Gupta; Sherinmol Thomas; Hanjabam Mickey; Chaitanya Charakana; Vineeta Singh Chauhan; Kapil Sharma; Rakesh Kumar; Kamal Tyagi; Supriya Sarma; Suresh Kumar Gupta; Himabindu Vasuki Kilambi; Sapana Nongmaithem; Alka Kumari; Prateek Gupta; Yellamaraju Sreelakshmi; Rameshwar Sharma
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Isolation and characterization of a novel Sphingobium yanoikuyae strain variant that uses biohazardous saturated hydrocarbons and aromatic compounds as sole carbon sources.

Authors:  Mautusi Mitra; Kevin Manoap-Anh-Khoa Nguyen; Taylor Wayland Box; Jesse Scott Gilpin; Seth Ryan Hamby; Taylor Lynne Berry; Erin Harper Duckett
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2020-07-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.