Literature DB >> 20491839

Hard tissue formation adjacent to implants of various size and configuration immediately placed into extraction sockets: an experimental study in dogs.

Marco Caneva1, Luiz Antonio Salata, Sergio Scombatti de Souza, Eriberto Bressan, Daniele Botticelli, Niklaus P Lang.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the influence of implant size and configuration on osseointegration in implants immediately placed into extraction sockets.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Implants were installed immediately into extraction sockets in the mandibles of six Labrador dogs. In the control sites, cylindrical transmucosal implants (3.3 mm diameter) were installed, while in the test sites, larger and conical (root formed, 5 mm diameter) implants were installed. After 4 months of healing, the resorptive patterns of the alveolar crest were evaluated histomorphometrically.
RESULTS: With one exception, all implants were integrated in mineralized bone, mainly composed of mature lamellar bone. The alveolar crest underwent resorption at the control as well as at the test implants. This resorption was more pronounced at the buccal aspects and significantly greater at the test (2.7+/-0.4 mm) than at the control implants (1.5+/-0.6 mm). However, the control implants were associated with residual defects that were deeper at the lingual than at the buccal aspects, while these defects were virtually absent at test implants.
CONCLUSIONS: The installment of root formed wide implants immediately into extraction sockets will not prevent the resorption of the alveolar crest. In contrast, this resorption is more marked both at the buccal and lingual aspects of root formed wide than at standard cylindrical implants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20491839     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01931.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  5 in total

Review 1.  Metallic Implants Used in Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

Authors:  Jakub Litak; Michał Szymoniuk; Wojciech Czyżewski; Zofia Hoffman; Joanna Litak; Leon Sakwa; Piotr Kamieniak
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 3.748

2.  Postextraction alveolar ridge preservation: biological basis and treatments.

Authors:  Giorgio Pagni; Gaia Pellegrini; William V Giannobile; Giulio Rasperini
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2012-06-12

3.  Immediate, early, and conventional implant placement in a patient with history of periodontitis.

Authors:  Alessandro Lanza; Fabio Scognamiglio; Felice Femiano; Michele Lanza
Journal:  Case Rep Dent       Date:  2015-04-08

4.  Effects of insertion torque values on the marginal bone loss of dental implants installed in sheep mandibles.

Authors:  Sergio Alexandre Gehrke; Jaime Aramburú Júnior; Tiago Luis Eirles Treichel; Tales Dias do Prado; Berenice Anina Dedavid; Piedad N de Aza
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 4.996

5.  Narrow- versus mini-implants at crestal and subcrestal bone levels. Experimental study in beagle dogs at three months.

Authors:  José Luis Calvo-Guirado; Carlos Pérez-Albacete; Antonio Aguilar-Salvatierra; José E de Val Maté-Sánchez; Rafael A Delgado-Ruiz; Marcus Abboud; Eugenio Velasco; Gerardo Gómez-Moreno; Georgios E Romanos
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 3.573

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.