Literature DB >> 20491811

Cone beam computed tomographic measurement of maxillary central incisors to determine prevalence of facial alveolar bone width ≥2 mm.

Hessam Nowzari1, Shervin Molayem, Ching Hsiu Ketty Chiu, Sandra K Rich.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The initial thickness of maxillary bone has significant impact on the responding level of facial bone and soft tissue after extraction and immediate implant placement. A prevailing notion is that following implant placement in fresh extraction sites, at least 2 mm of facial bone is needed to prevent soft tissue recession, fenestration, and dehiscence.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to use cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) to measure horizontal width of facial alveolar bone overlying healthy maxillary central incisors and to determine prevalence of bone thickness ≥2 mm.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Tomographic data from 101 randomly selected patients were evaluated by two independent observers. Assessments were made of facial bone width at levels 1.0 to 10.0 mm apical to the bone crest.
RESULTS: Healthy maxillary central incisors (n= 202) were measured from 101 patient scans. The percent of teeth with facial bone ≥2 mm at levels 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 mm from the bone crest was 0, 1.5, 2.0, 3.0, and 2.5%, respectively. Overall mean thickness of the bone was 1.05 mm for right and left central incisors combined. The range of individual measurements for all levels was 0 to 5.1 mm. The occurrence of ≥ 2 mm thickness bone measurements increased with increasing depth. However, mean widths observed at levels 6 to 10 mm from the crest ranged only 1.0 to 1.3 mm because of apparent fenestration occurrence (0 mm bone) in approximately 12% of teeth. Overall, no significant differences in bone thickness were found between ethnic, gender, age, or scan groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Using CBCT, occurrences of ≥2 mm maxillary facial alveolar bone were found on no more than 3% of root surfaces 1.0 to 5.0 mm apical to the bone crest in this sample of maxillary central incisors. The study evidenced prevalence of a thin facial alveolar bone (<2 mm) that may contribute to risk of facial bone fenestration, dehiscence, and soft tissue recession after immediate implant therapy.
© 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20491811     DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00287.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res        ISSN: 1523-0899            Impact factor:   3.932


  28 in total

1.  Classification of periodontal biotypes with the use of CBCT. A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Maria Nikiforidou; Lazaros Tsalikis; Christos Angelopoulos; Georgios Menexes; Ioannis Vouros; Antonios Konstantinides
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  The dimensions of the facial alveolar bone at tooth sites with local pathologies: a retrospective cone-beam CT analysis.

Authors:  Ausra Ramanauskaite; K Becker; H C Kassira; J Becker; R Sader; F Schwarz
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2019-08-15       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Morphologic analysis of alveolar bone in maxillary and mandibular incisors on sagittal views.

Authors:  Li-Qi Zhang; Ya-Ning Zhao; Ya-Qiong Zhang; Yu Zhang; Deng-Gao Liu
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2021-05-22       Impact factor: 1.246

4.  Establishment of reference mandibular plane for anterior alveolar morphology evaluation using cone beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Rong-yang Wang; Min Han; Hong Liu; Chun-ling Wang; Hong-hong Xian; Lei Zhang; Shi-jie Zhang; Dong-xu Liu
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 3.066

5.  Radiological implications of crestal and subcrestal implant placement in posterior areas. A cone-beam computed tomography study.

Authors:  Hilario Pellicer-Chover; Julio Rojo-Sanchís; Miguel Peñarrocha-Diago; José Viña-Almunia; David Peñarrocha-Oltra; Maria Peñarrocha-Diago
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2020-09-01

6.  [Three-dimensional morphology analysis of the supraosseous gingival profile of periodontally healthy maxillary anterior teeth].

Authors:  G Yang; W J Hu; J Cao; D G Liu
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2021-10-18

7.  Assessment of buccal bone thickness of aesthetic maxillary region: a cone-beam computed tomography study.

Authors:  Ramón Fuentes; Tania Flores; Pablo Navarro; Carlos Salamanca; Víctor Beltrán; Eduardo Borie
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 2.614

8.  Quantitative Comparison of Cephalogram and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography in the Evaluation of Alveolar Bone Thickness of Maxillary Incisors.

Authors:  Diyang Wei; Lingyun Zhang; Weiran Li; Yilin Jia
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2020-06-01

Review 9.  Zirconium dioxide implants as an alternative to titanium: A systematic review.

Authors:  Ivana Comisso; Santiago Arias-Herrera; Saurabh Gupta
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2021-05-01

10.  Comparison of anterior maxillary and mandibular alveolar parameters in African American and Caucasian women: A retrospective pilot study.

Authors:  Lauren Renaud; Vaibhav Gandhi; Cailynn West; Sudha Gudhimella; Nandakumar Janakiraman
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2021-03-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.